Literature DB >> 8441123

Passive sound localization of prey by the pallid bat (Antrozous p. pallidus).

Z M Fuzessery1, P Buttenhoff, B Andrews, J M Kennedy.   

Abstract

The pallid bat (Antrozous p. pallidus) uses passive sound localization to capture terrestrial prey. This study of captive pallid bats examined the roles of echolocation and passive sound localization in prey capture, and focused on their spectral requirements for accurate passive sound localization. Crickets were used as prey throughout these studies. All tests were conducted in dim, red light in an effort to preclude the use of vision. Hunting performance did not differ significantly in red light and total darkness, nor did it differ when visual contrast between the terrestrial prey and the substrate was varied, demonstrating that the bats did not use vision to locate prey. Our bats apparently used echolocation for general orientation, but not to locate prey. They did not increase their pulse emission rate prior to prey capture, suggesting that they were not actively scanning prey. Instead, they required prey-generated sounds for localization. The bats attended to the sound of walking crickets for localization, and also attacked small, inanimate objects dragged across the floor. Stationary and/or anesthetized crickets were ignored, as were crickets walking on substrates that greatly attenuated walking sounds. Cricket communication sounds were not used in prey localization; the bats never captured stationary, calling crickets. The accuracy of their passive sound localization was tested with an open-loop passive sound localization task that required them to land upon an anesthetized cricket tossed on the floor. The impact of a cricket produced a single 10-20 ms duration sound, yet with this information, the bats were able to land within 7.6 cm of the cricket from a maximum distance of 4.9 m. This performance suggests a sound localization accuracy of approximately +/- 1 degree in the horizontal and vertical dimensions of auditory space. The lower frequency limit for accurate sound localization was between 3-8 kHz. A physiological survey of frequency representation in the pallid bat inferior colliculus suggests that this lower frequency limit is around 5 kHz.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8441123     DOI: 10.1007/bf00213073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  5 in total

1.  Bat predation and the evolution of frog vocalizations in the neotropics.

Authors:  M D Tuttle; M J Ryan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-11-06       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Bat predation and its influence on calling behavior in neotropical katydids.

Authors:  J J Belwood; G K Morris
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-10-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Adaptation for sound localization in the ear and brainstem of mammals.

Authors:  R B Masterton
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1974-08

4.  Phenology of sound-producing arctiid moths and the activity of insectivorous bats.

Authors:  J H Fullard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1977-05-05       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Acoustical and neural aspects of hearing in the Australian gleaning bats, Macroderma gigas and Nyctophilus gouldi.

Authors:  A Guppy; R B Coles
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.836

  5 in total
  33 in total

1.  The effect of temporal structure on rustling-sound detection in the gleaning bat, Megaderma lyra.

Authors:  M Hübner; L Wiegrebe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 2.  Experience-dependent development of vocalization selectivity in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Khaleel A Razak; Zoltan M Fuzessery
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  GABA shapes a systematic map of binaural sensitivity in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Khaleel A Razak; Zoltan M Fuzessery
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Neural coding of echo-envelope disparities in echolocating bats.

Authors:  Frank Borina; Uwe Firzlaff; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 5.  Duration tuning in the auditory midbrain of echolocating and non-echolocating vertebrates.

Authors:  Riziq Sayegh; Brandon Aubie; Paul A Faure
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 6.  Multiple mechanisms shape selectivity for FM sweep rate and direction in the pallid bat inferior colliculus and auditory cortex.

Authors:  Zoltan M Fuzessery; Khaleel A Razak; Anthony J Williams
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Development of echolocation calls and neural selectivity for echolocation calls in the pallid bat.

Authors:  Khaleel A Razak; Zoltan M Fuzessery
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.964

8.  Parvalbumin and calbindin expression in parallel thalamocortical pathways in a gleaning bat, Antrozous pallidus.

Authors:  Heather Martin del Campo; Kevin Measor; Khaleel A Razak
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Development of parallel auditory thalamocortical pathways for two different behaviors.

Authors:  Khaleel A Razak; Zoltan M Fuzessery
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 3.856

10.  Can two streams of auditory information be processed simultaneously? Evidence from the gleaning bat Antrozous pallidus.

Authors:  J R Barber; K A Razak; Z M Fuzessery
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.