Literature DB >> 12665992

The effect of temporal structure on rustling-sound detection in the gleaning bat, Megaderma lyra.

M Hübner1, L Wiegrebe.   

Abstract

For a gleaning bat hunting prey from the ground, rustling sounds generated by prey movements are essential to invoke a hunting behaviour. The detection of prey-generated rustling sounds may depend heavily on the time structure of the prey-generated and the masking sounds due to their spectral similarity. Here, we systematically investigate the effect of the temporal structure on psychophysical rustling-sound detection in the gleaning bat, Megaderma lyra. A recorded rustling sound serves as the signal; the maskers are either Gaussian noise or broadband noise with various degrees of envelope fluctuations. Exploratory experiments indicate that the selective manipulation of the temporal structure of the rustling sound does not influence its detection in a Gaussian-noise masker. The results of the main experiment show, however, that the temporal structure of the masker has a strong and systematic effect on rustling-sound detection: When the width of irregularly spaced gaps in the masker exceeded about 0.3 ms, rustling-sound detection improved monotonically with increasing gap duration. Computer simulations of this experiment reveal that a combined detection strategy of spectral and temporal analysis underlies rustling-sound detection with fluctuating masking sounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12665992     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-003-0407-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  23 in total

1.  Within-channel cues in comodulation masking release (CMR): experiments and model predictions using a modulation-filterbank model.

Authors:  J L Verhey; T Dau; B Kollmeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Co-modulation masking release: spectro-temporal pattern analysis in hearing.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1990-04

3.  The sampling distribution of d'.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-01

4.  Simulation of mechanical to neural transduction in the auditory receptor.

Authors:  R Meddis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Release from masking caused by envelope fluctuations.

Authors:  S Buus
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Temporal integration in the echolocating bat, Megaderma lyra.

Authors:  L Wiegrebe; S Schmidt
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-12-01       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Acoustical and neural aspects of hearing in the Australian gleaning bats, Macroderma gigas and Nyctophilus gouldi.

Authors:  A Guppy; R B Coles
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Level dependence of cochlear nucleus onset unit responses and facilitation by second tones or broadband noise.

Authors:  I M Winter; A R Palmer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Passive sound localization of prey by the pallid bat (Antrozous p. pallidus).

Authors:  Z M Fuzessery; P Buttenhoff; B Andrews; J M Kennedy
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  What ears do for bats: a comparative study of pinna sound pressure transformation in chiroptera.

Authors:  M K Obrist; M B Fenton; J L Eger; P A Schlegel
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  5 in total

1.  Perceptual sensitivity to high-frequency interaural time differences created by rustling sounds.

Authors:  Stephan D Ewert; Katharina Kaiser; Lavinia Kernschmidt; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-11-29

2.  Classification of natural textures in echolocation.

Authors:  Jan-Eric Grunwald; Sven Schörnich; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Hunting at the highway: traffic noise reduces foraging efficiency in acoustic predators.

Authors:  Björn M Siemers; Andrea Schaub
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Individual differences show that only some bats can cope with noise-induced masking and distraction.

Authors:  Dylan G E Gomes; Holger R Goerlitz
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Noise distracts foraging bats.

Authors:  Louise C Allen; Nickolay I Hristov; Juliette J Rubin; Joseph T Lightsey; Jesse R Barber
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 5.349

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.