Literature DB >> 33689099

Multi-parametric approach to predict prosthetic valve size using CMR and clinical data: insights from SAVR.

Federico E Mordini1,2, Conor F Hynes3,4,5, Richard L Amdur4, Jeffrey Panting3,4, Dominic A Emerson3,4,5, Jason Morrissette6, Erin Goheen-Thomas6, Michael D Greenberg6, Gregory D Trachiotis3,4.   

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to characterize the CMR and clinical parameters that correlate to prosthetic valve size (PVS) determined at SAVR and develop a multi-parametric model to predict PVS. Sixty-two subjects were included. Linear/area measurements of the aortic annulus were performed on cine CMR images in systole/diastole on long/short axis (SAX) views. Clinical parameters (age, habitus, valve lesion, valve morphology) were recorded. PVS determined intraoperatively was the reference value. Data were analyzed using Spearman correlation. A prediction model combining imaging and clinical parameters was generated. Imaging parameters had moderate to moderately strong correlation to PVS with the highest correlations from systolic SAX mean diameter (r = 0.73, p < 0.0001) and diastolic SAX area (r = 0.73, p < 0.0001). Age was negatively correlated to PVS (r = - 0.47, p = 0.0001). Weight was weakly correlated to PVS (r = 0.27, p = 0.032). AI and bicuspid valve were not predictors of PVS. A model combining clinical and imaging parameters had high accuracy in predicting PVS (R2 = 0.61). Model predicted mean PVS was 23.3 mm (SD 1.1); actual mean PVS was 23.3 mm (SD 1.3). The Spearman r of the model (0.80, 95% CI 0.683-0.874) was significantly higher than systolic SAX area (0.68, 95% CI 0.516-0.795). Clinical parameters like age and habitus impact PVS; valve lesion/morphology do not. A multi-parametric model demonstrated high accuracy in predicting PVS and was superior to a single imaging parameter. A multi-parametric approach to device sizing may have future application in TAVR.
© 2021. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic annulus; Aortic insufficiency; Aortic stenosis; Aortic valve replacement; Experimental model; Magnetic resonance imaging

Year:  2021        PMID: 33689099     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-021-02203-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  19 in total

1.  Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and post-procedural aortic regurgitation: comparison among cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and echocardiography.

Authors:  Andrew Jabbour; Tevfik F Ismail; Neil Moat; Ankur Gulati; Isabelle Roussin; Francisco Alpendurada; Bradley Park; Francois Okoroafor; Anita Asgar; Sarah Barker; Simon Davies; Sanjay K Prasad; Michael Rubens; Raad H Mohiaddin
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Accuracy of aortic annular measurements obtained from three-dimensional echocardiography, CT and MRI: human in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  Wendy Tsang; Michael G Bateman; Lynn Weinert; Gian Pellegrini; Victor Mor-Avi; Lissa Sugeng; Hubert Yeung; Amit R Patel; Alexander J Hill; Paul A Iaizzo; Roberto M Lang
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography is equal to contrast-enhanced multislice computed tomography for correct aortic sizing before transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Peter Bernhardt; Christoph Rodewald; Julia Seeger; Birgid Gonska; Dominik Buckert; Michael Radermacher; Vinzenz Hombach; Wolfgang Rottbauer; Jochen Wöhrle
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Preoperative assessment of aortic annulus dimensions: comparison of noninvasive and intraoperative measurement.

Authors:  Alexey Dashkevich; Philipp Blanke; Matthias Siepe; Gregor Pache; Mathias Langer; Christian Schlensak; Friedhelm Beyersdorf
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Evaluation of aortic root for definition of prosthesis size by magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac computed tomography: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Ralf Koos; Ertunc Altiok; Andreas Horst Mahnken; Mirja Neizel; Guido Dohmen; Nikolaus Marx; Harald Kühl; Rainer Hoffmann
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  Noncontrast 3D CMR imaging for aortic valve annulus sizing in TAVR.

Authors:  Ambarish Gopal; Paul A Grayburn; Molly Mack; Isabel Chacon; Rebeca Kim; Debbie Montenegro; Teresa Phan; Jill Rudolph; Giovanni Filardo; Michael J Mack; Deepika Gopalakrishnan
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-03

7.  Technical Feasibility of a Combined Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Protocol for Preoperative Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Evaluation.

Authors:  Paola M Cannaò; Giuseppe Muscogiuri; U Joseph Schoepf; Carlo N De Cecco; Pal Suranyi; Virginia W Lesslie; Davide Piccini; Shivraman Giri; Akos Varga-Szemes
Journal:  J Thorac Imaging       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.000

8.  Is MRI equivalent to CT in the guidance of TAVR? A pilot study.

Authors:  Agnes Mayr; Gert Klug; Sebastian J Reinstadler; Hans-Josef Feistritzer; Martin Reindl; Christian Kremser; Christof Kranewitter; Nikolaos Bonaros; Guy Friedrich; Gudrun Feuchtner; Bernhard Metzler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging of aortic valve stenosis and aortic root to multimodality imaging for selection of transcatheter aortic valve implantation candidates.

Authors:  Bernard P Paelinck; Paul L Van Herck; Inez Rodrigus; Marc J Claeys; Jean-Claude Laborde; Paul M Parizel; Christiaan J Vrints; Johan M Bosmans
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Comparison of accuracy of aortic root annulus assessment with cardiac magnetic resonance versus echocardiography and multidetector computed tomography in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Gianluca Pontone; Daniele Andreini; Antonio L Bartorelli; Erika Bertella; Saima Mushtaq; Paola Gripari; Monica Loguercio; Sarah Cortinovis; Andrea Baggiano; Edoardo Conte; Virginia Beltrama; Andrea Annoni; Alberto Formenti; Gloria Tamborini; Manuela Muratori; Andrea Guaricci; Francesco Alamanni; Giovanni Ballerini; Mauro Pepi
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 2.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.