Literature DB >> 33450942

Simulated Radiation Dose Reduction in Whole-Body CT on a 3rd Generation Dual-Source Scanner: An Intraindividual Comparison.

Andreas S Brendlin1, Moritz T Winkelmann1, Phuong Linh Do2, Vincent Schwarze3, Felix Peisen1, Haidara Almansour1, Malte N Bongers1, Christoph P Artzner1, Jakob Weiss4, Jong Hyo Kim5,6, Ahmed E Othman1, Saif Afat1.   

Abstract

To evaluate the effect of radiation dose reduction on image quality and diagnostic confidence in contrast-enhanced whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) staging. We randomly selected March 2016 for retrospective inclusion of 18 consecutive patients (14 female, 60 ± 15 years) with clinically indicated WBCT staging on the same 3rd generation dual-source CT. Using low-dose simulations, we created data sets with 100, 80, 60, 40, and 20% of the original radiation dose. Each set was reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP) and Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction (ADMIRE®, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) strength 1-5, resulting in 540 datasets total. ADMIRE 2 was the reference standard for intraindividual comparison. The effective radiation dose was calculated using commercially available software. For comparison of objective image quality, noise assessments of subcutaneous adipose tissue regions were performed automatically using the software. Three radiologists blinded to the study evaluated image quality and diagnostic confidence independently on an equidistant 5-point Likert scale (1 = poor to 5 = excellent). At 100%, the effective radiation dose in our population was 13.3 ± 9.1 mSv. At 20% radiation dose, it was possible to obtain comparably low noise levels when using ADMIRE 5 (p = 1.000, r = 0.29). We identified ADMIRE 3 at 40% radiation dose (5.3 ± 3.6 mSv) as the lowest achievable radiation dose with image quality and diagnostic confidence equal to our reference standard (p = 1.000, r > 0.4). The inter-rater agreement for this result was almost perfect (ICC ≥ 0.958, 95% CI 0.909-0.983). On a 3rd generation scanner, it is feasible to maintain good subjective image quality, diagnostic confidence, and image noise in single-energy WBCT staging at dose levels as low as 40% of the original dose (5.3 ± 3.6 mSv), when using ADMIRE 3.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3rd generation dual-source scanner; Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction (ADMIRE); CT; Filtered Back Projection (FBP); image reconstruction; iterative reconstruction (IR); radiation dose; whole-body staging

Year:  2021        PMID: 33450942      PMCID: PMC7828410          DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11010118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)        ISSN: 2075-4418


  29 in total

1.  Automated tube voltage selection for radiation dose and contrast medium reduction at coronary CT angiography using 3(rd) generation dual-source CT.

Authors:  Stefanie Mangold; Julian L Wichmann; U Joseph Schoepf; Zachary B Poole; Christian Canstein; Akos Varga-Szemes; Damiano Caruso; Fabian Bamberg; Konstantin Nikolaou; Carlo N De Cecco
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Evaluation of reduced-dose CT for acute non-traumatic abdominal pain: evaluation of diagnostic accuracy in comparison to standard-dose CT.

Authors:  Ahmed E Othman; Malte Niklas Bongers; Dominik Zinsser; Christoph Schabel; Julian L Wichmann; Rami Arshid; Mike Notohamiprodjo; Konstantin Nikolaou; Fabian Bamberg
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 1.990

3.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

4.  Diagnostic Performance of an Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm for Low-Contrast Detectability with a Third-Generation Dual-Source Multidetector CT Scanner: Potential for Radiation Dose Reduction in a Multireader Study.

Authors:  Justin Solomon; Achille Mileto; Juan Carlos Ramirez-Giraldo; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Frequent body CT scanning of young adults: indications, outcomes, and risk for radiation-induced cancer.

Authors:  Robert L Zondervan; Peter F Hahn; Cheryl A Sadow; Bob Liu; Susanna I Lee
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Advanced modelled iterative reconstruction for abdominal CT: qualitative and quantitative evaluation.

Authors:  S Gordic; L Desbiolles; P Stolzmann; L Gantner; S Leschka; D B Husarik; H Alkadhi
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 2.350

7.  Effect of automated tube voltage selection, integrated circuit detector and advanced iterative reconstruction on radiation dose and image quality of 3rd generation dual-source aortic CT angiography: An intra-individual comparison.

Authors:  Stefanie Mangold; Carlo N De Cecco; Julian L Wichmann; Christian Canstein; Akos Varga-Szemes; Damiano Caruso; Stephen R Fuller; Fabian Bamberg; Konstantin Nikolaou; U Joseph Schoepf
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de González; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Kwang-Pyo Kim; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Rebecca Lewis; Fred Mettler; Charles Land
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-14

Review 9.  Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization.

Authors:  Mannudeep K Kalra; Michael M Maher; Thomas L Toth; Leena M Hamberg; Michael A Blake; Jo-Anne Shepard; Sanjay Saini
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Diagnostic Performance of Different Simulated Low-Dose Levels in Patients with Suspected Cervical Abscess Using a Third-Generation Dual-Source CT Scanner.

Authors:  Moritz T Winkelmann; Saif Afat; Sven S Walter; Eva Stock; Vincent Schwarze; Andreas Brendlin; Manuel Kolb; Christoph P Artzner; Ahmed E Othman
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  AI Denoising Significantly Improves Image Quality in Whole-Body Low-Dose Computed Tomography Staging.

Authors:  Andreas S Brendlin; David Plajer; Maryanna Chaika; Robin Wrazidlo; Arne Estler; Ilias Tsiflikas; Christoph P Artzner; Saif Afat; Malte N Bongers
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.