Literature DB >> 28406049

Evaluation of reduced-dose CT for acute non-traumatic abdominal pain: evaluation of diagnostic accuracy in comparison to standard-dose CT.

Ahmed E Othman1, Malte Niklas Bongers1, Dominik Zinsser1, Christoph Schabel1, Julian L Wichmann2, Rami Arshid3, Mike Notohamiprodjo1, Konstantin Nikolaou1, Fabian Bamberg1.   

Abstract

Background Patients with acute non-traumatic abdominal pain often undergo abdominal computed tomography (CT). However, abdominal CT is associated with high radiation exposure. Purpose To evaluate diagnostic performance of a reduced-dose 100 kVp CT protocol with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction as compared to a linearly blended 120 kVp protocol for assessment of acute, non-traumatic abdominal pain. Material and Methods Two radiologists assessed 100 kVp and linearly blended 120 kVp series of 112 consecutive patients with acute non-traumatic pain (onset < 48 h) regarding image quality, noise, and artifacts on a five-point Likert scale. Both radiologists assessed both series for abdominal pathologies and for diagnostic confidence. Both 100 kVp and linearly blended 120 kVp series were quantitatively evaluated regarding radiation dose and image noise. Comparative statistics and diagnostic accuracy was calculated using receiver operating curve (ROC) statistics, with final clinical diagnosis/clinical follow-up as reference standard. Results Image quality was high for both series without detectable significant differences ( P = 0.157). Image noise and artifacts were rated low for both series but significantly higher for 100 kVp ( P ≤ 0.021). Diagnostic accuracy was high for both series (120 kVp: area under the curve [AUC] = 0.950, sensitivity = 0.958, specificity = 0.941; 100 kVp: AUC ≥ 0.910, sensitivity ≥ 0.937, specificity = 0.882; P ≥ 0.516) with almost perfect inter-rater agreement (Kappa = 0.939). Diagnostic confidence was high for both dose levels without significant differences (100 kVp 5, range 4-5; 120 kVp 5, range 3-5; P = 0.134). The 100 kVp series yielded 26.1% lower radiation dose compared with the 120 kVp series (5.72 ± 2.23 mSv versus 7.75 ± 3.02 mSv, P < 0.001). Image noise was significantly higher in reduced-dose CT (13.3 ± 2.4 HU versus 10.6 ± 2.1 HU; P < 0.001). Conclusion Reduced-dose abdominal CT using 100 kVp yields excellent image quality and high diagnostic accuracy for the assessment of acute non-traumatic abdominal pain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low-dose CT; acute abdominal pain; computed tomography (CT); diagnostic accuracy; radiation dose

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28406049     DOI: 10.1177/0284185117703152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  7 in total

Review 1.  Advanced imaging techniques for chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Anushri Parakh; Temel Tirkes
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-05

2.  Low-dose CT imaging of the acute abdomen using model-based iterative reconstruction: a prospective study.

Authors:  Fiachra Moloney; Karl James; Maria Twomey; David Ryan; Tyler M Grey; Amber Downes; Richard G Kavanagh; Niamh Moore; Mary Jane Murphy; Jackie Bye; Brian W Carey; Sean E McSweeney; Conor Deasy; Emmett Andrews; Fergus Shanahan; Michael M Maher; Owen J O'Connor
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2018-11-17

Review 3.  Noncontrast MRI of acute abdominal pain caused by gastrointestinal lesions: indications, protocol, and image interpretation.

Authors:  Akitoshi Inoue; Akira Furukawa; Kai Takaki; Yugo Imai; Shinichi Ota; Norihisa Nitta; Yoshiyuki Watanabe
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Reduced scan range abdominopelvic CT in patients with suspected acute appendicitis - impact on diagnostic accuracy and effective radiation dose.

Authors:  Dominik Zinsser; Michael Maurer; Phuong-Linh Do; Jakob Weiß; Mike Notohamiprodjo; Fabian Bamberg; Ahmed E Othman
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 1.930

5.  Simulated Radiation Dose Reduction in Whole-Body CT on a 3rd Generation Dual-Source Scanner: An Intraindividual Comparison.

Authors:  Andreas S Brendlin; Moritz T Winkelmann; Phuong Linh Do; Vincent Schwarze; Felix Peisen; Haidara Almansour; Malte N Bongers; Christoph P Artzner; Jakob Weiss; Jong Hyo Kim; Ahmed E Othman; Saif Afat
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-13

6.  Low-dose CT for diagnosing intestinal obstruction and pneumoperitoneum; need for retakes and diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Nis E Larsen; Eva Mikkelsen; Anders R Knudsen; Lars P Larsen
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2021-03-11

Review 7.  Caecal diverticulitis can be misdiagnosed as acute appendicitis: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Isabelle Uhe; Jeremy Meyer; Manuela Viviano; Surrennaidoo Naiken; Christian Toso; Frédéric Ris; Nicolas C Buchs
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 3.917

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.