Literature DB >> 21723488

Frequent body CT scanning of young adults: indications, outcomes, and risk for radiation-induced cancer.

Robert L Zondervan1, Peter F Hahn, Cheryl A Sadow, Bob Liu, Susanna I Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to define the magnitude of frequent body CT scanning of young adults and to determine associated patient diagnoses, examination indications, short-term outcomes, and estimated radiation-induced cancer risk.
METHODS: Patients aged 18 to 35 years who underwent chest or abdominopelvic CT between 2003 and 2007 at any of 3 hospitals were identified and categorized by total number of scans per body part as rarely (<5), intermediately (>5 and <15), or frequently (>15) scanned. Medical records of the frequently scanned were reviewed. Cumulative radiation exposure, calculated from typical effective doses, was used to estimate cancer risk. Cancer incidence and mortality were estimated using the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation method.
RESULTS: A total of 25,104 patients underwent 45,632 scans, of whom 23,851 (95%) and 70 (0.3%) were rarely and frequently scanned, respectively. Among frequently scanned patients, the most common diagnoses were cancer (19 of 36 [52.8%]) and cystic fibrosis with lung transplantation (11 of 36 [30.5%]) for chest CT and cancer (25 of 34 [73.5%]) for abdominopelvic CT. During the mean 5.4 years (range, 0.9-7.6 years) of follow-up, 46% of frequently scanned patients (32 of 70) died. Of the 47 cancers predicted in the entire cohort, 36 (77%) and 2 (3%) were expected in the rarely and frequently scanned.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of CT-induced cancers are predicted to result from sporadic rather than frequent scanning. Frequent scanning confers a significant cancer risk but occurs in severely ill patients, a large proportion of who die before any radiation-induced cancer would be a factor in their health.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21723488     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.12.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  10 in total

1.  Prioritizing examination-centered over patient-centered dose reduction: a hazard of institutional "benchmarking".

Authors:  Jonathan D Eisenberg; Michael E Gilmore; Mannudeep K Kalra; Chung Yin Kong; Pari V Pandharipande
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Radiation risks associated with serial imaging in colorectal cancer patients: should we worry?

Authors:  Jeong Suk Oh; Jonathan B Koea
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  An institutional review of hospital resource utilization and patient radiation exposure in shunted idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Tyler Cho; Daniel Kreatsoulas; Joel Fritz; John M McGregor; Douglas A Hardesty
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  The communication of the radiation risk from CT in relation to its clinical benefit in the era of personalized medicine: part 2: benefits versus risk of CT.

Authors:  Sjirk J Westra
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-10-11

Review 5.  From 'Image Gently' to image intelligently: a personalized perspective on diagnostic radiation risk.

Authors:  R Paul Guillerman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-10-11

6.  Simulated Radiation Dose Reduction in Whole-Body CT on a 3rd Generation Dual-Source Scanner: An Intraindividual Comparison.

Authors:  Andreas S Brendlin; Moritz T Winkelmann; Phuong Linh Do; Vincent Schwarze; Felix Peisen; Haidara Almansour; Malte N Bongers; Christoph P Artzner; Jakob Weiss; Jong Hyo Kim; Ahmed E Othman; Saif Afat
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-13

7.  AI Denoising Improves Image Quality and Radiological Workflows in Pediatric Ultra-Low-Dose Thorax Computed Tomography Scans.

Authors:  Andreas S Brendlin; Ulrich Schmid; David Plajer; Maryanna Chaika; Markus Mader; Robin Wrazidlo; Simon Männlin; Jakob Spogis; Arne Estler; Michael Esser; Jürgen Schäfer; Saif Afat; Ilias Tsiflikas
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-06-24

Review 8.  Are Risks From Medical Imaging Still too Small to Be Observed or Nonexistent?

Authors:  Brant A Ulsh
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  Ambient Pressure Tympanometry Wave Patterns in Patients With Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence.

Authors:  Anthony Thai; Zahra N Sayyid; Davood K Hosseini; Austin Swanson; Yifei Ma; Ksenia A Aaron; Yona Vaisbuch
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  AI Denoising Significantly Improves Image Quality in Whole-Body Low-Dose Computed Tomography Staging.

Authors:  Andreas S Brendlin; David Plajer; Maryanna Chaika; Robin Wrazidlo; Arne Estler; Ilias Tsiflikas; Christoph P Artzner; Saif Afat; Malte N Bongers
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.