BACKGROUND: The use of computed tomographic (CT) scans in the United States (US) has increased more than 3-fold since 1993 to approximately 70 million scans annually. Despite the great medical benefits, there is concern about the potential radiation-related cancer risk. We conducted detailed estimates of the future cancer risks from current CT scan use in the US according to age, sex, and scan type. METHODS: Risk models based on the National Research Council's "Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation" report and organ-specific radiation doses derived from a national survey were used to estimate age-specific cancer risks for each scan type. These models were combined with age- and sex-specific scan frequencies for the US in 2007 obtained from survey and insurance claims data. We estimated the mean number of radiation-related incident cancers with 95% uncertainty limits (UL) using Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS: Overall, we estimated that approximately 29 000 (95% UL, 15 000-45 000) future cancers could be related to CT scans performed in the US in 2007. The largest contributions were from scans of the abdomen and pelvis (n = 14 000) (95% UL, 6900-25 000), chest (n = 4100) (95% UL, 1900-8100), and head (n = 4000) (95% UL, 1100-8700), as well as from chest CT angiography (n = 2700) (95% UL, 1300-5000). One-third of the projected cancers were due to scans performed at the ages of 35 to 54 years compared with 15% due to scans performed at ages younger than 18 years, and 66% were in females. CONCLUSIONS: These detailed estimates highlight several areas of CT scan use that make large contributions to the total cancer risk, including several scan types and age groups with a high frequency of use or scans involving relatively high doses, in which risk-reduction efforts may be warranted.
BACKGROUND: The use of computed tomographic (CT) scans in the United States (US) has increased more than 3-fold since 1993 to approximately 70 million scans annually. Despite the great medical benefits, there is concern about the potential radiation-related cancer risk. We conducted detailed estimates of the future cancer risks from current CT scan use in the US according to age, sex, and scan type. METHODS: Risk models based on the National Research Council's "Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation" report and organ-specific radiation doses derived from a national survey were used to estimate age-specific cancer risks for each scan type. These models were combined with age- and sex-specific scan frequencies for the US in 2007 obtained from survey and insurance claims data. We estimated the mean number of radiation-related incident cancers with 95% uncertainty limits (UL) using Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS: Overall, we estimated that approximately 29 000 (95% UL, 15 000-45 000) future cancers could be related to CT scans performed in the US in 2007. The largest contributions were from scans of the abdomen and pelvis (n = 14 000) (95% UL, 6900-25 000), chest (n = 4100) (95% UL, 1900-8100), and head (n = 4000) (95% UL, 1100-8700), as well as from chest CT angiography (n = 2700) (95% UL, 1300-5000). One-third of the projected cancers were due to scans performed at the ages of 35 to 54 years compared with 15% due to scans performed at ages younger than 18 years, and 66% were in females. CONCLUSIONS: These detailed estimates highlight several areas of CT scan use that make large contributions to the total cancer risk, including several scan types and age groups with a high frequency of use or scans involving relatively high doses, in which risk-reduction efforts may be warranted.
Authors: Aaron Sodickson; Pieter F Baeyens; Katherine P Andriole; Luciano M Prevedello; Richard D Nawfel; Richard Hanson; Ramin Khorasani Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Mario Castro; Sean B Fain; Eric A Hoffman; David S Gierada; Serpil C Erzurum; Sally Wenzel Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2011-06-02 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Linda Papa; Lawrence M Lewis; Jay L Falk; Zhiqun Zhang; Salvatore Silvestri; Philip Giordano; Gretchen M Brophy; Jason A Demery; Neha K Dixit; Ian Ferguson; Ming Cheng Liu; Jixiang Mo; Linnet Akinyi; Kara Schmid; Stefania Mondello; Claudia S Robertson; Frank C Tortella; Ronald L Hayes; Kevin K W Wang Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2011-11-08 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Brunhild M Halm; Jennifer F Lai; Cynthia M Morrison; Ian Pagano; Laurie J Custer; Robert V Cooney; Adrian A Franke Journal: Arch Biochem Biophys Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 4.013
Authors: Anne Marie Lennon; Lindsey L Manos; Ralph H Hruban; Syed Z Ali; Elliot K Fishman; Ihab R Kamel; Siva P Raman; Atif Zaheer; Susan Hutfless; Ashley Salamone; Vandhana Kiswani; Nita Ahuja; Martin A Makary; Matthew J Weiss; Kenzo Hirose; Michael Goggins; Christopher L Wolfgang Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2014-05-08 Impact factor: 5.344