Parker J B Jenkins1, Taly Gilat Schmidt1. 1. Marquette University and Medical College of Wisconsin, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Milwaukee, United States.
Abstract
Purpose: We investigated the performance of a neural network (NN) material decomposition method under varying pileup conditions. Approach: Experiments were performed at tube current settings that provided count rates incident on the detector through air equal to 9%, 14%, 27%, 40%, and 54% of the maximum detector count rate. An NN was trained for each count-rate level using transmission measurements through known thicknesses of basis materials (PMMA and aluminum). The NN trained for each count-rate level was applied to x-ray transmission measurements through test materials and to CT data of a rod phantom. Material decomposition error was evaluated as the distance in basis material space between the estimated thicknesses and ground truth. Results: There was no clear trend between count-rate level and material decomposition error for all test materials except neoprene. As an example result, Teflon error was 0.33 cm at the 9% count-rate level and 0.12 cm at the 54% count-rate level for the x-ray transmission experiments. Decomposition error increased with count-rate level for the neoprene test case, with 0.65-cm error at 9% count-rate level and 1.14-cm error at the 54% count-rate level. In the CT study, material decomposition error decreased with increasing incident count rate. For example, the material decomposition error for Teflon was 0.089, 0.066, 0.054 at count-rate levels of 14%, 27%, and 40%, respectively. Conclusions: Results demonstrate over a range of incident count-rate levels that an NN trained at a specific count-rate level can learn the relationship between photon-counting spectral measurements and basis material thicknesses.
Purpose: We investigated the performance of a neural network (NN) material decomposition method under varying pileup conditions. Approach: Experiments were performed at tube current settings that provided count rates incident on the detector through air equal to 9%, 14%, 27%, 40%, and 54% of the maximum detector count rate. An NN was trained for each count-rate level using transmission measurements through known thicknesses of basis materials (PMMA and aluminum). The NN trained for each count-rate level was applied to x-ray transmission measurements through test materials and to CT data of a rod phantom. Material decomposition error was evaluated as the distance in basis material space between the estimated thicknesses and ground truth. Results: There was no clear trend between count-rate level and material decomposition error for all test materials except neoprene. As an example result, Teflon error was 0.33 cm at the 9% count-rate level and 0.12 cm at the 54% count-rate level for the x-ray transmission experiments. Decomposition error increased with count-rate level for the neoprene test case, with 0.65-cm error at 9% count-rate level and 1.14-cm error at the 54% count-rate level. In the CT study, material decomposition error decreased with increasing incident count rate. For example, the material decomposition error for Teflon was 0.089, 0.066, 0.054 at count-rate levels of 14%, 27%, and 40%, respectively. Conclusions: Results demonstrate over a range of incident count-rate levels that an NN trained at a specific count-rate level can learn the relationship between photon-counting spectral measurements and basis material thicknesses.
Authors: Jochen Cammin; Jennifer Xu; William C Barber; Jan S Iwanczyk; Neal E Hartsough; Katsuyuki Taguchi Journal: Med Phys Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Rolf Symons; Amir Pourmorteza; Veit Sandfort; Mark A Ahlman; Tracy Cropper; Marissa Mallek; Steffen Kappler; Stefan Ulzheimer; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Elizabeth C Jones; Ashkan A Malayeri; Les R Folio; David A Bluemke Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-07-28 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: David P Cormode; Salim Si-Mohamed; Daniel Bar-Ness; Monica Sigovan; Pratap C Naha; Joelle Balegamire; Franck Lavenne; Philippe Coulon; Ewald Roessl; Matthias Bartels; Michal Rokni; Ira Blevis; Loic Boussel; Philippe Douek Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-07-06 Impact factor: 4.379