Literature DB >> 33382453

Technical Note: A fast and monolithic prototype clinical proton radiography system optimized for pencil beam scanning.

Ethan A DeJongh1, Don F DeJongh1, Igor Polnyi1, Victor Rykalin1, Christina Sarosiek2, George Coutrakon2, Kirk L Duffin3, Nicholas T Karonis3,4, Caesar E Ordoñez3, Mark Pankuch5, John R Winans3, James S Welsh6,7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To demonstrate a proton-imaging system based on well-established fast scintillator technology to achieve high performance with low cost and complexity, with the potential of a straightforward translation into clinical use.
METHODS: The system tracks individual protons through one (X, Y) scintillating fiber tracker plane upstream and downstream of the object and into a 13-cm -thick scintillating block residual energy detector. The fibers in the tracker planes are multiplexed into silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) to reduce the number of electronics channels. The light signal from the residual energy detector is collected by 16 photomultiplier tubes (PMTs). Only four signals from the PMTs are output from each event, which allows for fast signal readout. A robust calibration method of the PMT signal to residual energy has been developed to obtain accurate proton images. The development of patient-specific scan patterns using multiple input energies allows for an image to be produced with minimal excess dose delivered to the patient.
RESULTS: The calibration of signals in the energy detector produces accurate residual range measurements limited by intrinsic range straggling. We measured the water-equivalent thickness (WET) of a block of solid water (physical thickness of 6.10 mm) with a proton radiograph. The mean WET from all pixels in the block was 6.13 cm (SD 0.02 cm). The use of patient-specific scan patterns using multiple input energies enables imaging with a compact range detector.
CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a prototype clinical proton radiography system for pretreatment imaging in proton radiation therapy. We have optimized the system for use with pencil beam scanning systems and have achieved a reduction of size and complexity compared to previous designs.
© 2020 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  calibration; proton imaging; proton radiography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33382453      PMCID: PMC7965348          DOI: 10.1002/mp.14700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  8 in total

1.  Patient-specific stopping power calibration for proton therapy planning based on single-detector proton radiography.

Authors:  P J Doolan; M Testa; G Sharp; E H Bentefour; G Royle; H-M Lu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Proton radiography.

Authors:  A M Koehler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-04-19       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Regularised patient-specific stopping power calibration for proton therapy planning based on proton radiographic images.

Authors:  N Krah; V Patera; S Rit; A Schiavi; I Rinaldi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  TOPAS: an innovative proton Monte Carlo platform for research and clinical applications.

Authors:  J Perl; J Shin; J Schumann; B Faddegon; H Paganetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Design and characterisation of a real time proton and carbon ion radiography system based on scintillating optical fibres.

Authors:  D Lo Presti; D L Bonanno; F Longhitano; D G Bongiovanni; G V Russo; E Leonora; N Randazzo; S Reito; V Sipala; G Gallo
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 2.685

6.  Proton radiography as a tool for quality control in proton therapy.

Authors:  U Schneider; E Pedroni
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Fast In Situ Image Reconstruction for Proton Radiography.

Authors:  Caesar E Ordoñez; Nicholas T Karonis; Kirk L Duffin; John R Winans; Ethan A DeJongh; Don F DeJongh; George Coutrakon; Nicole F Myers; Mark Pankuch; James S Welsh
Journal:  J Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-05-25

8.  Development of a Head Scanner for Proton CT.

Authors:  H F-W Sadrozinski; R P Johnson; S Macafee; A Plumb; D Steinberg; A Zatserklyaniy; V Bashkirov F Hurley; R Schulte
Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 1.455

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  A comparison of proton stopping power measured with proton CT and x-ray CT in fresh postmortem porcine structures.

Authors:  Don F DeJongh; Ethan A DeJongh; Victor Rykalin; Greg DeFillippo; Mark Pankuch; Andrew W Best; George Coutrakon; Kirk L Duffin; Nicholas T Karonis; Caesar E Ordoñez; Christina Sarosiek; Reinhard W Schulte; John R Winans; Alec M Block; Courtney L Hentz; James S Welsh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  An Iterative Least Squares Method for Proton CT Image Reconstruction.

Authors:  Don F DeJongh; Ethan A DeJongh
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2021-05-11

3.  Analysis of characteristics of images acquired with a prototype clinical proton radiography system.

Authors:  Christina Sarosiek; Ethan A DeJongh; George Coutrakon; Don F DeJongh; Kirk L Duffin; Nicholas T Karonis; Caesar E Ordoñez; Mark Pankuch; Victor Rykalin; John R Winans; James S Welsh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Management of Motion and Anatomical Variations in Charged Particle Therapy: Past, Present, and Into the Future.

Authors:  Julia M Pakela; Antje Knopf; Lei Dong; Antoni Rucinski; Wei Zou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 6.244

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.