Literature DB >> 25668437

Patient-specific stopping power calibration for proton therapy planning based on single-detector proton radiography.

P J Doolan1, M Testa, G Sharp, E H Bentefour, G Royle, H-M Lu.   

Abstract

A simple robust optimizer has been developed that can produce patient-specific calibration curves to convert x-ray computed tomography (CT) numbers to relative stopping powers (HU-RSPs) for proton therapy treatment planning. The difference between a digitally reconstructed radiograph water-equivalent path length (DRRWEPL) map through the x-ray CT dataset and a proton radiograph (set as the ground truth) is minimized by optimizing the HU-RSP calibration curve. The function of the optimizer is validated with synthetic datasets that contain no noise and its robustness is shown against CT noise. Application of the procedure is then demonstrated on a plastic and a real tissue phantom, with proton radiographs produced using a single detector. The mean errors using generic/optimized calibration curves between the DRRWEPL map and the proton radiograph were 1.8/0.4% for a plastic phantom and -2.1/ - 0.2% for a real tissue phantom. It was then demonstrated that these optimized calibration curves offer a better prediction of the water equivalent path length at a therapeutic depth. We believe that these promising results are suggestive that a single proton radiograph could be used to generate a patient-specific calibration curve as part of the current proton treatment planning workflow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25668437     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/5/1901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

Review 1.  In vivo range verification in particle therapy.

Authors:  Katia Parodi; Jerimy C Polf
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Status and innovations in pre-treatment CT imaging for proton therapy.

Authors:  Patrick Wohlfahrt; Christian Richter
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  A comparison of proton stopping power measured with proton CT and x-ray CT in fresh postmortem porcine structures.

Authors:  Don F DeJongh; Ethan A DeJongh; Victor Rykalin; Greg DeFillippo; Mark Pankuch; Andrew W Best; George Coutrakon; Kirk L Duffin; Nicholas T Karonis; Caesar E Ordoñez; Christina Sarosiek; Reinhard W Schulte; John R Winans; Alec M Block; Courtney L Hentz; James S Welsh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A proton imaging system using a volumetric liquid scintillator: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Chinmay D Darne; Fahed Alsanea; Daniel G Robertson; Fada Guan; Tinsu Pan; David Grosshans; Sam Beddar
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2019-07-12

Review 5.  Latest developments in in-vivo imaging for proton therapy.

Authors:  Katia Parodi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Proton beam therapy for cancer in the era of precision medicine.

Authors:  Man Hu; Liyang Jiang; Xiangli Cui; Jianguang Zhang; Jinming Yu
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 17.388

7.  Technical Note: A fast and monolithic prototype clinical proton radiography system optimized for pencil beam scanning.

Authors:  Ethan A DeJongh; Don F DeJongh; Igor Polnyi; Victor Rykalin; Christina Sarosiek; George Coutrakon; Kirk L Duffin; Nicholas T Karonis; Caesar E Ordoñez; Mark Pankuch; John R Winans; James S Welsh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Helium ion beam imaging for image guided ion radiotherapy.

Authors:  M Martišíková; T Gehrke; S Berke; G Aricò; O Jäkel
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.481

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.