Literature DB >> 33154789

Fast In Situ Image Reconstruction for Proton Radiography.

Caesar E Ordoñez1, Nicholas T Karonis2,3, Kirk L Duffin2, John R Winans1, Ethan A DeJongh4, Don F DeJongh4, George Coutrakon5, Nicole F Myers2, Mark Pankuch6, James S Welsh7,8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Proton beam therapy is an emerging modality for cancer treatment that, compared to X-ray radiation therapy, promises to provide better dose delivery to clinical targets with lower doses to normal tissues. Crucial to accurate treatment planning and dose delivery is knowledge of the water equivalent path length (WEPL) of each ray, or pencil beam, from the skin to every point in the target. For protons, this length is estimated from relative stopping power based on X-ray Hounsfield units. Unfortunately, such estimates lead to 3 to 4% uncertainties in the proton range prediction. Therefore, protons in the Bragg peak may overshoot (or undershoot) the desired stopping depth in the target causing tissue damage beyond the target volume. Recent studies indicate that tomographic imaging using protons has the potential to provide directly more accurate measurement of RSPs with significantly lower radiation dose than X-rays. We are currently working on a proton radiography system that promises to provide accurate two-dimensional (2D) images of WEPL values for protons that pass through the body. These will be suitable for positioning and range verification in daily treatments. In this study, we demonstrate that this system is capable of rapidly achieving such accurate images in clinically meaningful times.
METHODS: We have developed a software platform to characterize the potential performance of the prototype proton radiography system. We use Geant4 to simulate raw data detected by the device. An especially-written software - pRad - was written to process these data as they are received and uses iterative methods to generate radiographs. The software has been designed to generate a radiograph from a few million protons in under a minute after receiving the first proton from the device. We used a head phantom with known chemical compositions that could be modelled quite accurately in Geant4 simulations of proton radiographs. The radiographs are displayed as pixelated WEPL values displayed on a 2D gray scale image of WEPL values.
RESULTS: Rapid radiograph reconstruction of 3D phantoms using simulated proton pencil beams have been achieved with our software platform. On a modest desktop computer with a single central processing unit (CPU) and a single graphics processing unit (GPU), it takes about 11 seconds to reconstruct images using iterative linear algorithms to reconstruct a radiograph from 7.6 million protons. For the radiographic reconstructions of the head phantom described here, the mean WEPL errors, in the proton radiograph using a large majority of the pixels in the complete image were less than 1 mm when compared to images obtained without proton scattering and without detector resolution included.
CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated, through computer simulations of proton irradiation of a pediatric head phantom using the newly built pRad detector and image reconstruction software, that high quality proton radiographs can be generated for patient alignment and verification of water equivalent thickness of the patient before each treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient Alignment; Proton Computed Tomography; Proton Radiography; Range Verification; Relative Stopping Power; Treatment Planning

Year:  2019        PMID: 33154789      PMCID: PMC7641509          DOI: 10.1007/s13566-019-00387-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1948-7908


  13 in total

1.  The most likely path of an energetic charged particle through a uniform medium.

Authors:  D C Williams
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Imaging in particle therapy: State of the art and future perspective.

Authors:  Joao Seco; Maria Francesca Spadea
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.089

3.  Density resolution of proton computed tomography.

Authors:  Reinhard W Schulte; Vladimir Bashkirov; Márgio C Loss Klock; Tianfang Li; Andrew J Wroe; Ivan Evseev; David C Williams; Todd Satogata
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A maximum likelihood proton path formalism for application in proton computed tomography.

Authors:  R W Schulte; S N Penfold; J T Tafas; K E Schubert
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  In vivo proton range verification: a review.

Authors:  Antje-Christin Knopf; Antony Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Submillimeter ionoacoustic range determination for protons in water at a clinical synchrocyclotron.

Authors:  Sebastian Lehrack; Walter Assmann; Damien Bertrand; Sebastien Henrotin; Joel Herault; Vincent Heymans; Francois Vander Stappen; Peter G Thirolf; Marie Vidal; Jarno Van de Walle; Katia Parodi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  The potential of dual-energy CT to reduce proton beam range uncertainties.

Authors:  Esther Bär; Arthur Lalonde; Gary Royle; Hsiao-Ming Lu; Hugo Bouchard
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  A maximum likelihood method for high resolution proton radiography/proton CT.

Authors:  Charles-Antoine Collins-Fekete; Sébastien Brousmiche; Stephen K N Portillo; Luc Beaulieu; Joao Seco
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Algebraic reconstruction techniques (ART) for three-dimensional electron microscopy and x-ray photography.

Authors:  R Gordon; R Bender; G T Herman
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 2.691

10.  Software platform for simulation of a prototype proton CT scanner.

Authors:  Valentina Giacometti; Vladimir A Bashkirov; Pierluigi Piersimoni; Susanna Guatelli; Tia E Plautz; Hartmut F-W Sadrozinski; Robert P Johnson; Andriy Zatserklyaniy; Thomas Tessonnier; Katia Parodi; Anatoly B Rosenfeld; Reinhard W Schulte
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.506

View more
  4 in total

1.  A comparison of proton stopping power measured with proton CT and x-ray CT in fresh postmortem porcine structures.

Authors:  Don F DeJongh; Ethan A DeJongh; Victor Rykalin; Greg DeFillippo; Mark Pankuch; Andrew W Best; George Coutrakon; Kirk L Duffin; Nicholas T Karonis; Caesar E Ordoñez; Christina Sarosiek; Reinhard W Schulte; John R Winans; Alec M Block; Courtney L Hentz; James S Welsh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  An Iterative Least Squares Method for Proton CT Image Reconstruction.

Authors:  Don F DeJongh; Ethan A DeJongh
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2021-05-11

3.  Analysis of characteristics of images acquired with a prototype clinical proton radiography system.

Authors:  Christina Sarosiek; Ethan A DeJongh; George Coutrakon; Don F DeJongh; Kirk L Duffin; Nicholas T Karonis; Caesar E Ordoñez; Mark Pankuch; Victor Rykalin; John R Winans; James S Welsh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Technical Note: A fast and monolithic prototype clinical proton radiography system optimized for pencil beam scanning.

Authors:  Ethan A DeJongh; Don F DeJongh; Igor Polnyi; Victor Rykalin; Christina Sarosiek; George Coutrakon; Kirk L Duffin; Nicholas T Karonis; Caesar E Ordoñez; Mark Pankuch; John R Winans; James S Welsh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.071

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.