Literature DB >> 8461589

Bone densitometry: current assessment.

H K Genant1, K G Faulkner, C C Glüer, K Engelke.   

Abstract

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Musculoskeletal; NASA Discipline Number 26-10; NASA Program Space Physiology and Countermeasures; Non-NASA Center

Mesh：

Year:  1993        PMID： 8461589     DOI： 10.1007/bf01621875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN： 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


× No keyword cloud information.
  35 in total

1.  The predictive value of quantitative computed tomography for vertebral body compressive strength and ash density.

Authors:  L Mosekilde; S M Bentzen; G Ortoft; J Jørgensen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Noninvasive axial and peripheral assessment of bone mineral content: a comparison between osteoporotic women and normal subjects.

Authors:  F N Van Berkum; J C Birkenhäger; L C Van Veen; J Zeelenberg; D H Birkenhäger-Frenkel; W T Trouerbach; T Stijnen; H A Pols
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Comparative assessment of dual-photon absorptiometry and dual-energy radiography.

Authors:  C C Glüer; P Steiger; R Selvidge; K Elliesen-Kliefoth; C Hayashi; H K Genant
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The relationship of peripheral to axial bone density.

Authors:  P Schneider; W Börner; R B Mazess; H Barden
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1988-07

5.  Comparison of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and dual photon absorptiometry for bone mineral measurements of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  H W Wahner; W L Dunn; M L Brown; R L Morin; B L Riggs
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Comparison of single- and dual-photon absorptiometry in postmenopausal bone mineral loss.

Authors:  L Nilas; J Borg; A Gotfredsen; C Christiansen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Mild versus definite osteoporosis: comparison of bone densitometry techniques using different statistical models.

Authors:  A F Heuck; J Block; C C Glueer; P Steiger; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Dual-photon absorptiometry: comparison of bone mineral and soft tissue mass measurements in vivo with established methods.

Authors:  S B Heymsfield; J Wang; S Heshka; J J Kehayias; R N Pierson
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Detection of prefracture spinal osteoporosis using bone mineral absorptiometry.

Authors:  P D Ross; R D Wasnich; J M Vogel
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Dual energy radiography versus quantitative computer tomography for the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  R Pacifici; R Rupich; M Griffin; A Chines; N Susman; L V Avioli
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.958
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Current methods and advances in bone densitometry.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; C C Gluer; S Majumdar; B A Blunt; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Phantomless calibration of CT scans for measurement of BMD and bone strength-Inter-operator reanalysis precision.

Authors:  David C Lee; Paul F Hoffmann; David L Kopperdahl; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  The impact of clothing style on bone mineral density among women in Turkey.

Authors:  D Alper Hayirlioglu; Husnu Gokaslan; Canan Cimsit; N Ozden Serin
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 2.631

4.  Beam hardening artifacts in micro-computed tomography scanning can be reduced by X-ray beam filtration and the resulting images can be used to accurately measure BMD.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Meganck; Kenneth M Kozloff; Michael M Thornton; Stephen M Broski; Steven A Goldstein
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  The importance of severity of arthrosis for the reliability of bone mineral density measurement in women.

Authors:  Alper Hayirlioglu; Husnu Gokaslan; Canan Cimsit; Begumhan Baysal
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 2.631

6.  Comparison of logistic and Bayesian classifiers for evaluating the risk of femoral neck fracture in osteoporotic patients.

Authors:  D Testi; A Cappello; L Chiari; M Viceconti; S Gnudi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.079
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.