Literature DB >> 1536984

Effective dose values in bone mineral measurements by photon absorptiometry and computed tomography.

W A Kalender1.   

Abstract

A high degree of uncertainty and irritation predominates in the assessment and comparison of radiation dose values resulting from measurements of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine by photon absorptiometry and X-ray computed tomography. The skin dose values which are usually given in the literature are of limited relevance because the size of the irradiated volumes, the relative sensitivity of the affected organs and the radiation energies are not taken into account. The concept of effective dose, sometimes called whole-body equivalent dose, has to be applied. A detailed analysis results in an effective dose value of about 1 microSv for absorptiometry and about 30 microSv for computed tomography when low kV and mAs values are used. Lateral localizer radiographs, which are necessary for slice selection in CT, mean an additional dose of 30 microSv. Lateral X-ray films of the spine which are frequently taken in combination with absorptiometry result in a dose of 700 microSv or more. The concept of effective dose, the basic data and assumptions used in its assessment and a comparison with other dose burdens (for example the natural background radiation, of typically 2400 microSv per year) are discussed in detail.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1536984     DOI: 10.1007/bf01623841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  17 in total

1.  Uneven distribution of bone minerals and covering effect of non-mineralized tissue as reasons for impaired detectability of bone density from roentgenograms.

Authors:  P VIRTAMA
Journal:  Ann Med Intern Fenn       Date:  1960

2.  [The effective dose equivalent: clarification and comments on the new dosage concept].

Authors:  H Traut
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1989-10

3.  Precision error in dual-photon absorptiometry related to source age.

Authors:  P D Ross; R D Wasnich; J M Vogel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Validity of dual-photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  C C Glüer; P Steiger; H K Genant
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Effect dose equivalent in dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  D W Pye; W J Hannan; R Hesp
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Vertebral bone mineral analysis: an integrated approach with CT.

Authors:  W A Kalender; E Klotz; C Suess
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Average radiation doses in a standard head examination for 250 CT systems.

Authors:  J L McCrohan; J F Patterson; R M Gagne; H A Goldstein
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission x-ray computed tomography.

Authors:  T B Shope; R M Gagne; G C Johnson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Low-dose CT scanning for quantitative spinal mineral analysis.

Authors:  C E Cann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  [CT examinations using a reduced radiation dosage].

Authors:  D Felsenberg; W A Kalender; W Trinkwalter; K J Wolf
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1990-11
View more
  34 in total

1.  High heritability of bone size at the hip and spine in Chinese.

Authors:  Wei-Xia Jian; Ji-Rong Long; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 3.172

2.  Effect of gender on intra-abdominal fat in teenagers and young adults.

Authors:  Sandra A Chung; Frederick Dorey; Steven Mittelman; Vicente Gilsanz
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-10-31

3.  Osteoporosis case finding in the general practice: phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry with and without risk factors for osteoporosis to select postmenopausal women eligible for lumbar spine and hip densitometry.

Authors:  Katharina M Gasser; Christian Mueller; Marcel Zwahlen; Manfred Kaufmann; Gaby Fuchs; Romain Perrelet; Gilbert Abetel; Ulrich Bürgi; Kurt Lippuner
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-02-12       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Assessing bone mass in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Tishya A L Wren; Vicente Gilsanz
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Retroacetabular stress-shielding in THA.

Authors:  Rocco P Pitto; Akanksha Bhargava; Salil Pandit; Jacob T Munro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Reciprocal relations of subcutaneous and visceral fat to bone structure and strength.

Authors:  Vicente Gilsanz; James Chalfant; Ashley O Mo; David C Lee; Frederick J Dorey; Steven D Mittelman
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 7.  Measurement of bone mineral density.

Authors:  C Hassager; C Christiansen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 8.  Quantitative imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis and sarcopenia.

Authors:  Sara Guerri; Daniele Mercatelli; Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez; Alessandro Napoli; Giuseppe Battista; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Alberto Bazzocchi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

9.  Osteoporosis in a female population from Bratislava--age-related BMD changes.

Authors:  Jaroslava Wendlová; Viera Pacáková
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2007

10.  Vitamin D status and its relationship to body fat, final height, and peak bone mass in young women.

Authors:  Richard Kremer; Patricia P Campbell; Timothy Reinhardt; Vicente Gilsanz
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 5.958

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.