Literature DB >> 2054716

Long-term precision of bone loss rate measurements among postmenopausal women.

J W Davis1, P D Ross, R D Wasnich, C J MacLean, J M Vogel.   

Abstract

Repeated measurements of bone mineral content can indicate the rate of bone loss among postmenopausal women. The clinical utility of such loss rate measurements will depend upon the long-term precision of the measurements. We have analyzed the precision of appendicular bone measurements among 495 Japanese-Americans followed for an average of 5.3 years and of both appendicular and axial measurements among 70 clinical trial participants followed for 2 years. Tables were derived from these analyses to quantitate the precision of individual loss rates under varying measurement conditions that might be encountered in clinical practice. The results demonstrate that only unusually rapid loss rates could be identified with confidence within short intervals, such as 1 year or 2. Extending the length of follow-up, however, appreciably improved the measured loss rate precision. In comparisons between bone sites, appendicular sites were determined to achieve a specified precision within the shortest intervals, followed by spine dual photon absorptiometry measurements. Spine quantitative computerized tomography measurements and measurements of hip sites required considerably longer follow-up intervals to achieve comparable precision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2054716     DOI: 10.1007/bf02556150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  8 in total

1.  The measurement of rates of mineral loss with aging.

Authors:  D M Smith; J A Norton; R Khairi; C C Johnston
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  1976-05

2.  Precision error in dual-photon absorptiometry related to source age.

Authors:  P D Ross; R D Wasnich; J M Vogel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Should perimenopausal women be screened for osteoporosis?

Authors:  S R Cummings; D Black
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  En recherche de la différence (P less than 0.05).

Authors:  R P Heaney
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1986-04

5.  Planning a longitudinal study. II. Frequency of measurement and study duration.

Authors:  J J Schlesselman
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1973-09

6.  A model for estimating the potential costs and savings of osteoporosis prevention strategies.

Authors:  P D Ross; R D Wasnich; C J Maclean; R Hagino; J M Vogel
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Bone mineral measurements among middle-aged and elderly Japanese residents in Hawaii.

Authors:  K Yano; R D Wasnich; J M Vogel; L K Heilbrun
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Measurement of spinal or peripheral bone mass to estimate early postmenopausal bone loss?

Authors:  B J Riis; C Christiansen
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.965

  8 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  Population screening for osteoporosis to prevent fractures.

Authors:  T A Sheldon; N Freemantle; S Ibbotson; C Pollock; J Mason; A F Long
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-03

2.  On genetic studies of bone loss.

Authors:  Fang Yang; Hui Shen; Hui Jiang; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Comparison of whole genome linkage scans in premenopausal and postmenopausal women: no bone-loss-specific QTLs were implicated.

Authors:  H Yan; Y-J Liu; Q Zhou; P Xiao; R R Recker; H-W Deng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Densitometric analysis of the human calcaneus.

Authors:  F J Fernandez Camacho; P Morante Martinez; R Rodríguez Torres; A Cortes García; L Gomez Pellico
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques.

Authors:  C C Glüer; G Blake; Y Lu; B A Blunt; M Jergas; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Different rates of forearm bone loss in healthy women with early or late menopause.

Authors:  G Luisetto; M Zangari; F Bottega; F Peccolo; P Galuppo; A Nardi; D Ziliotto
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Long-term unilateral loading and bone mineral density and content in female squash players.

Authors:  H Haapasalo; P Kannus; H Sievänen; A Heinonen; P Oja; I Vuori
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  When should bone density measurements be repeated?

Authors:  Y F He; P D Ross; J W Davis; R S Epstein; J M Vogel; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Bone mineral density in midlife long-term users of hormonal contraception in South Africa: relationship with obesity and menopausal status.

Authors:  Mags E Beksinska; Immo Kleinschmidt; Jenni A Smit
Journal:  Womens Midlife Health       Date:  2018-04-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.