Literature DB >> 33150463

SAMPL7: Host-guest binding prediction by molecular dynamics and quantum mechanics.

Yiğitcan Eken1, Nuno M S Almeida1, Cong Wang1, Angela K Wilson2,3.   

Abstract

Statistical Assessment of Modeling of Proteins and Ligands (SAMPL) challenges provide routes to compare chemical quantities determined using computational chemistry approaches to experimental measurements that are shared after the competition. For this effort, several computational methods have been used to calculate the binding energies of Octa Acid (OA) and exo-Octa Acid (exoOA) host-guest systems for SAMPL7. The initial poses for molecular dynamics (MD) were generated by molecular docking. Binding free energy calculations were performed using molecular mechanics combined with Poisson-Boltzmann or generalized Born surface area solvation (MMPBSA/MMGBSA) approaches. The factors that affect the utility of the MMPBSA/MMGBSA approaches including solvation, partial charge, and solute entropy models were also analyzed. In addition to MD calculations, quantum mechanics (QM) calculations were performed using several different density functional theory (DFT) approaches. From SAMPL6 results, B3PW91-D3 was found to overestimate binding energies though it was effective for geometry optimizations, so it was considered for the DFT geometry optimizations in the current study, with single-point energy calculations carried out with B2PLYP-D3 with double-, triple-, and quadruple-ζ level basis sets. Accounting for dispersion effects, and solvation models was deemed essential for the predictions. MMGBSA and MMPBSA correlated better to experiment when used in conjunction with an empirical/linear correction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binding free energy calculations; Computational drug design; Density functional theory; MMPBSA/MMGBSA; Molecular dynamics; Quantum mechanics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33150463     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-020-00357-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  59 in total

1.  The SAMPL2 blind prediction challenge: introduction and overview.

Authors:  Matthew T Geballe; A Geoffrey Skillman; Anthony Nicholls; J Peter Guthrie; Peter J Taylor
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 2.  Combining docking and molecular dynamic simulations in drug design.

Authors:  Hernán Alonso; Andrey A Bliznyuk; Jill E Gready
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 12.944

3.  The SAMP1 solvation challenge: further lessons regarding the pitfalls of parametrization.

Authors:  Anthony Nicholls; Stanislaw Wlodek; J Andrew Grant
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  pKa measurements for the SAMPL6 prediction challenge for a set of kinase inhibitor-like fragments.

Authors:  Mehtap Işık; Dorothy Levorse; Ariën S Rustenburg; Ikenna E Ndukwe; Heather Wang; Xiao Wang; Mikhail Reibarkh; Gary E Martin; Alexey A Makarov; David L Mobley; Timothy Rhodes; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  The evolution of drug design at Merck Research Laboratories.

Authors:  Frank K Brown; Edward C Sherer; Scott A Johnson; M Katharine Holloway; Bradley S Sherborne
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Blind prediction of host-guest binding affinities: a new SAMPL3 challenge.

Authors:  Hari S Muddana; C Daniel Varnado; Christopher W Bielawski; Adam R Urbach; Lyle Isaacs; Matthew T Geballe; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  A novel series of cysteine-dependent, allosteric inverse agonists of the nuclear receptor RORγt.

Authors:  Xin Jiang; Irina Dulubova; Scott A Reisman; Martha Hotema; Chun-Yue I Lee; Liping Liu; Lyndsey McCauley; Isaac Trevino; Deborah A Ferguson; Yigitcan Eken; Angela K Wilson; W Christian Wigley; Melean Visnick
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  A small-molecule inhibitor of BCL6 kills DLBCL cells in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Leandro C Cerchietti; Alexandru F Ghetu; Xiao Zhu; Gustavo F Da Silva; Shijun Zhong; Marilyn Matthews; Karen L Bunting; Jose M Polo; Christophe Farès; Cheryl H Arrowsmith; Shao Ning Yang; Monica Garcia; Andrew Coop; Alexander D Mackerell; Gilbert G Privé; Ari Melnick
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 9.  Overview of the SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: Are we doing better?

Authors:  Jian Yin; Niel M Henriksen; David R Slochower; Michael R Shirts; Michael W Chiu; David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 10.  The SAMPL4 host-guest blind prediction challenge: an overview.

Authors:  Hari S Muddana; Andrew T Fenley; David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.686

View more
  3 in total

1.  An overview of the SAMPL8 host-guest binding challenge.

Authors:  Martin Amezcua; Jeffry Setiadi; Yunhui Ge; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 4.179

2.  Heteroatoms (Si, B, N, and P) doped 2D monolayer MoS2 for NH3 gas detection.

Authors:  Terkumbur E Gber; Hitler Louis; Aniekan E Owen; Benjamin E Etinwa; Innocent Benjamin; Fredrick C Asogwa; Muyiwa M Orosun; Ededet A Eno
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 4.036

3.  SAMPL7 Host-Guest Challenge Overview: assessing the reliability of polarizable and non-polarizable methods for binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Martin Amezcua; Léa El Khoury; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.686

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.