Literature DB >> 33392951

SAMPL7 Host-Guest Challenge Overview: assessing the reliability of polarizable and non-polarizable methods for binding free energy calculations.

Martin Amezcua1, Léa El Khoury1, David L Mobley2,3.   

Abstract

The SAMPL challenges focus on testing and driving progress of computational methods to help guide pharmaceutical drug discovery. However, assessment of methods for predicting binding affinities is often hampered by computational challenges such as conformational sampling, protonation state uncertainties, variation in test sets selected, and even lack of high quality experimental data. SAMPL blind challenges have thus frequently included a component focusing on host-guest binding, which removes some of these challenges while still focusing on molecular recognition. Here, we report on the results of the SAMPL7 blind prediction challenge for host-guest affinity prediction. In this study, we focused on three different host-guest categories-a familiar deep cavity cavitand series which has been featured in several prior challenges (where we examine binding of a series of guests to two hosts), a new series of cyclodextrin derivatives which are monofunctionalized around the rim to add amino acid-like functionality (where we examine binding of two guests to a series of hosts), and binding of a series of guests to a new acyclic TrimerTrip host which is related to previous cucurbituril hosts. Many predictions used methods based on molecular simulations, and overall success was mixed, though several methods stood out. As in SAMPL6, we find that one strategy for achieving reasonable accuracy here was to make empirical corrections to binding predictions based on previous data for host categories which have been studied well before, though this can be of limited value when new systems are included. Additionally, we found that alchemical free energy methods using the AMOEBA polarizable force field had considerable success for the two host categories in which they participated. The new TrimerTrip system was also found to introduce some sampling problems, because multiple conformations may be relevant to binding and interconvert only slowly. Overall, results in this challenge tentatively suggest that further investigation of polarizable force fields for these challenges may be warranted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binding affinity; Blind challenge; Cucurbituril; Cyclodextrin; Free energy; Host–guest binding; OctaAcid; SAMPL

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33392951      PMCID: PMC8121194          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-020-00363-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  81 in total

1.  Ion solvation thermodynamics from simulation with a polarizable force field.

Authors:  Alan Grossfield; Pengyu Ren; Jay W Ponder
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Development and testing of a general amber force field.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Romain M Wolf; James W Caldwell; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Well-defined, organic nanoenvironments in water: the hydrophobic effect drives a capsular assembly.

Authors:  Corinne L D Gibb; Bruce C Gibb
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Collaborating to improve the use of free-energy and other quantitative methods in drug discovery.

Authors:  Bradley Sherborne; Veerabahu Shanmugasundaram; Alan C Cheng; Clara D Christ; Renee L DesJarlais; Jose S Duca; Richard A Lewis; Deborah A Loughney; Eric S Manas; Georgia B McGaughey; Catherine E Peishoff; Herman van Vlijmen
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Assessing the accuracy of octanol-water partition coefficient predictions in the SAMPL6 Part II log P Challenge.

Authors:  Mehtap Işık; Teresa Danielle Bergazin; Thomas Fox; Andrea Rizzi; John D Chodera; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Automation of the CHARMM General Force Field (CGenFF) II: assignment of bonded parameters and partial atomic charges.

Authors:  K Vanommeslaeghe; E Prabhu Raman; A D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Anion binding to hydrophobic concavity is central to the salting-in effects of Hofmeister chaotropes.

Authors:  Corinne L D Gibb; Bruce C Gibb
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Identifying ligand binding sites and poses using GPU-accelerated Hamiltonian replica exchange molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Kai Wang; John D Chodera; Yanzhi Yang; Michael R Shirts
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Polarizable Multipole-Based Force Field for Dimethyl and Trimethyl Phosphate.

Authors:  Changsheng Zhang; Chao Lu; Qiantao Wang; Jay W Ponder; Pengyu Ren
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Proximal charge effects on guest binding to a non-polar pocket.

Authors:  Paolo Suating; Thong T Nguyen; Nicholas E Ernst; Yang Wang; Jacobs H Jordan; Corinne L D Gibb; Henry S Ashbaugh; Bruce C Gibb
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 9.825

View more
  11 in total

1.  An overview of the SAMPL8 host-guest binding challenge.

Authors:  Martin Amezcua; Jeffry Setiadi; Yunhui Ge; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 4.179

Review 2.  Computational Modeling of Supramolecular Metallo-organic Cages-Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Tomasz K Piskorz; Vicente Martí-Centelles; Tom A Young; Paul J Lusby; Fernanda Duarte
Journal:  ACS Catal       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 13.700

3.  Biomolecular Modeling and Simulation: A Prospering Multidisciplinary Field.

Authors:  Tamar Schlick; Stephanie Portillo-Ledesma; Christopher G Myers; Lauren Beljak; Justin Chen; Sami Dakhel; Daniel Darling; Sayak Ghosh; Joseph Hall; Mikaeel Jan; Emily Liang; Sera Saju; Mackenzie Vohr; Chris Wu; Yifan Xu; Eva Xue
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 12.981

4.  Application of the alchemical transfer and potential of mean force methods to the SAMPL8 host-guest blinded challenge.

Authors:  Solmaz Azimi; Joe Z Wu; Sheenam Khuttan; Tom Kurtzman; Nanjie Deng; Emilio Gallicchio
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Cavitand Complexes in Aqueous Solution: Collaborative Experimental and Computational Studies of the Wetting, Assembly, and Function of Nanoscopic Bowls in Water.

Authors:  Henry S Ashbaugh; Bruce C Gibb; Paolo Suating
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 6.  Unlocking the computational design of metal-organic cages.

Authors:  Andrew Tarzia; Kim E Jelfs
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 6.222

7.  SAMPL7 protein-ligand challenge: A community-wide evaluation of computational methods against fragment screening and pose-prediction.

Authors:  Harold Grosjean; Mehtap Işık; Anthony Aimon; David Mobley; John Chodera; Frank von Delft; Philip C Biggin
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.179

8.  Relative Binding Free Energy between Chemically Distant Compounds Using a Bidirectional Nonequilibrium Approach.

Authors:  Piero Procacci
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 6.578

9.  Computation of host-guest binding free energies with a new quantum mechanics based mining minima algorithm.

Authors:  Peng Xu; Tosaporn Sattasathuchana; Emilie Guidez; Simon P Webb; Kilinoelani Montgomery; Hussna Yasini; Iara F M Pedreira; Mark S Gordon
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2021-03-14       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Evaluation of log P, pKa, and log D predictions from the SAMPL7 blind challenge.

Authors:  Teresa Danielle Bergazin; Nicolas Tielker; Yingying Zhang; Junjun Mao; M R Gunner; Karol Francisco; Carlo Ballatore; Stefan M Kast; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.