Literature DB >> 22366955

Blind prediction of host-guest binding affinities: a new SAMPL3 challenge.

Hari S Muddana1, C Daniel Varnado, Christopher W Bielawski, Adam R Urbach, Lyle Isaacs, Matthew T Geballe, Michael K Gilson.   

Abstract

The computational prediction of protein-ligand binding affinities is of central interest in early-stage drug-discovery, and there is a widely recognized need for improved methods. Low molecular weight receptors and their ligands--i.e., host-guest systems--represent valuable test-beds for such affinity prediction methods, because their small size makes for fast calculations and relatively facile numerical convergence. The SAMPL3 community exercise included the first ever blind prediction challenge for host-guest binding affinities, through the incorporation of 11 new host-guest complexes. Ten participating research groups addressed this challenge with a variety of approaches. Statistical assessment indicates that, although most methods performed well at predicting some general trends in binding affinity, overall accuracy was not high, as all the methods suffered from either poor correlation or high RMS errors or both. There was no clear advantage in using explicit versus implicit solvent models, any particular force field, or any particular approach to conformational sampling. In a few cases, predictions using very similar energy models but different sampling and/or free-energy methods resulted in significantly different results. The protonation states of one host and some guest molecules emerged as key uncertainties beyond the choice of computational approach. The present results have implications for methods development and future blind prediction exercises.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22366955      PMCID: PMC3383923          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-012-9554-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  55 in total

1.  Analysis of catalytic residues in enzyme active sites.

Authors:  Gail J Bartlett; Craig T Porter; Neera Borkakoti; Janet M Thornton
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.

Authors:  Araz Jakalian; David B Jack; Christopher I Bayly
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Yong Duan; Chun Wu; Shibasish Chowdhury; Mathew C Lee; Guoming Xiong; Wei Zhang; Rong Yang; Piotr Cieplak; Ray Luo; Taisung Lee; James Caldwell; Junmei Wang; Peter Kollman
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 4.  Macroscopic electrostatic models for protonation states in proteins.

Authors:  Donald Bashford
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2004-05-01

5.  Free energy, entropy, and induced fit in host-guest recognition: calculations with the second-generation mining minima algorithm.

Authors:  Chia-En Chang; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  The SAMPL2 blind prediction challenge: introduction and overview.

Authors:  Matthew T Geballe; A Geoffrey Skillman; Anthony Nicholls; J Peter Guthrie; Peter J Taylor
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Efficient and Accurate Double-Hybrid-Meta-GGA Density Functionals-Evaluation with the Extended GMTKN30 Database for General Main Group Thermochemistry, Kinetics, and Noncovalent Interactions.

Authors:  Lars Goerigk; Stefan Grimme
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Random walk in orthogonal space to achieve efficient free-energy simulation of complex systems.

Authors:  Lianqing Zheng; Mengen Chen; Wei Yang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Hydrogen bonding and pi-stacking: how reliable are force fields? A critical evaluation of force field descriptions of nonbonded interactions.

Authors:  Robert S Paton; Jonathan M Goodman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  CSAR benchmark exercise of 2010: combined evaluation across all submitted scoring functions.

Authors:  Richard D Smith; James B Dunbar; Peter Man-Un Ung; Emilio X Esposito; Chao-Yie Yang; Shaomeng Wang; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 4.956

View more
  74 in total

1.  SAMPL3: blinded prediction of host-guest binding affinities, hydration free energies, and trypsin inhibitors.

Authors:  A Geoffrey Skillman
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  BEDAM binding free energy predictions for the SAMPL4 octa-acid host challenge.

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio; Haoyuan Chen; He Chen; Michael Fitzgerald; Yang Gao; Peng He; Malathi Kalyanikar; Chuan Kao; Beidi Lu; Yijie Niu; Manasi Pethe; Jie Zhu; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  The SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: computing binding free energies and enthalpies from explicit solvent simulations by the attach-pull-release (APR) method.

Authors:  Jian Yin; Niel M Henriksen; David R Slochower; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  pKa measurements for the SAMPL6 prediction challenge for a set of kinase inhibitor-like fragments.

Authors:  Mehtap Işık; Dorothy Levorse; Ariën S Rustenburg; Ikenna E Ndukwe; Heather Wang; Xiao Wang; Mikhail Reibarkh; Gary E Martin; Alexey A Makarov; David L Mobley; Timothy Rhodes; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Predicting ligand binding affinity using on- and off-rates for the SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge.

Authors:  Tom Dixon; Samuel D Lotz; Alex Dickson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Absolute binding free energies for octa-acids and guests in SAMPL5 : Evaluating binding free energies for octa-acid and guest complexes in the SAMPL5 blind challenge.

Authors:  Florentina Tofoleanu; Juyong Lee; Frank C Pickard Iv; Gerhard König; Jing Huang; Minkyung Baek; Chaok Seok; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  An efficient protocol for obtaining accurate hydration free energies using quantum chemistry and reweighting from molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Frank C Pickard; Gerhard König; Andrew C Simmonett; Yihan Shao; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Escaping Atom Types in Force Fields Using Direct Chemical Perception.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Caitlin C Bannan; Andrea Rizzi; Christopher I Bayly; John D Chodera; Victoria T Lim; Nathan M Lim; Kyle A Beauchamp; David R Slochower; Michael R Shirts; Michael K Gilson; Peter K Eastman
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Detailed potential of mean force studies on host-guest systems from the SAMPL6 challenge.

Authors:  Lin Frank Song; Nupur Bansal; Zheng Zheng; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Binding enthalpy calculations for a neutral host-guest pair yield widely divergent salt effects across water models.

Authors:  Kaifu Gao; Jian Yin; Niel M Henriksen; Andrew T Fenley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.