Literature DB >> 36229622

An overview of the SAMPL8 host-guest binding challenge.

Martin Amezcua1, Jeffry Setiadi2, Yunhui Ge1, David L Mobley3,4.   

Abstract

The SAMPL series of challenges aim to focus the community on specific modeling challenges, while testing and hopefully driving progress of computational methods to help guide pharmaceutical drug discovery. In this study, we report on the results of the SAMPL8 host-guest blind challenge for predicting absolute binding affinities. SAMPL8 focused on two host-guest datasets, one involving the cucurbituril CB8 (with a series of common drugs of abuse) and another involving two different Gibb deep-cavity cavitands. The latter dataset involved a previously featured deep cavity cavitand (TEMOA) as well as a new variant (TEETOA), both binding to a series of relatively rigid fragment-like guests. Challenge participants employed a reasonably wide variety of methods, though many of these were based on molecular simulations, and predictive accuracy was mixed. As in some previous SAMPL iterations (SAMPL6 and SAMPL7), we found that one approach to achieve greater accuracy was to apply empirical corrections to the binding free energy predictions, taking advantage of prior data on binding to these hosts. Another approach which performed well was a hybrid MD-based approach with reweighting to a force matched QM potential. In the cavitand challenge, an alchemical method using the AMOEBA-polarizable force field achieved the best success with RMSE less than 1 kcal/mol, while another alchemical approach (ATM/GAFF2-AM1BCC/TIP3P/HREM) had RMSE less than 1.75 kcal/mol. The work discussed here also highlights several important lessons; for example, retrospective studies of reference calculations demonstrate the sensitivity of predicted binding free energies to ethyl group sampling and/or guest starting pose, providing guidance to help improve future studies on these systems.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binding affinity; Blind challenge; Cucurbituril; Free energy; Host–guest binding; Octaacid; SAMPL

Year:  2022        PMID: 36229622     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-022-00462-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   4.179


  85 in total

1.  Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory.

Authors:  Stefan Grimme; Stephan Ehrlich; Lars Goerigk
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 2.  Accelerating drug discovery through tight integration of expert molecular design and predictive scoring.

Authors:  Robert Abel; Sayan Mondal; Craig Masse; Jeremy Greenwood; Geraldine Harriman; Mark A Ashwell; Sathesh Bhat; Ronald Wester; Leah Frye; Rosana Kapeller; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  Separated topologies--a method for relative binding free energy calculations using orientational restraints.

Authors:  Gabriel J Rocklin; David L Mobley; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Advancing Drug Discovery through Enhanced Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Robert Abel; Lingle Wang; Edward D Harder; B J Berne; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 22.384

5.  Overview of the SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinity prediction challenge.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Steven Murkli; John N McNeill; Wei Yao; Matthew Sullivan; Michael K Gilson; Michael W Chiu; Lyle Isaacs; Bruce C Gibb; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Assessment of Binding Affinity via Alchemical Free-Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Maximilian Kuhn; Stuart Firth-Clark; Paolo Tosco; Antonia S J S Mey; Mark Mackey; Julien Michel
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Current status of the AMOEBA polarizable force field.

Authors:  Jay W Ponder; Chuanjie Wu; Pengyu Ren; Vijay S Pande; John D Chodera; Michael J Schnieders; Imran Haque; David L Mobley; Daniel S Lambrecht; Robert A DiStasio; Martin Head-Gordon; Gary N I Clark; Margaret E Johnson; Teresa Head-Gordon
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Double-Hybrid Density Functionals Provide a Balanced Description of Excited (1)La and (1)Lb States in Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons.

Authors:  Lars Goerigk; Stefan Grimme
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Prospective Evaluation of Free Energy Calculations for the Prioritization of Cathepsin L Inhibitors.

Authors:  Bernd Kuhn; Michal Tichý; Lingle Wang; Shaughnessy Robinson; Rainer E Martin; Andreas Kuglstatter; Jörg Benz; Maude Giroud; Tanja Schirmeister; Robert Abel; François Diederich; Jérôme Hert
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  SAMPL7 Host-Guest Challenge Overview: assessing the reliability of polarizable and non-polarizable methods for binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Martin Amezcua; Léa El Khoury; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.