Literature DB >> 16758486

Combining docking and molecular dynamic simulations in drug design.

Hernán Alonso1, Andrey A Bliznyuk, Jill E Gready.   

Abstract

A rational approach is needed to maximize the chances of finding new drugs, and to exploit the opportunities of potential new drug targets emerging from genomic and proteomic initiatives, and from the large libraries of small compounds now readily available through combinatorial chemistry. Despite a shaky early history, computer-aided drug design techniques can now be effective in reducing costs and speeding up drug discovery. This happy outcome results from development of more accurate and reliable algorithms, use of more thoughtfully planned strategies to apply them, and greatly increased computer power to allow studies with the necessary reliability to be performed. Our review focuses on applications and protocols, with the main emphasis on critical analysis of recent studies where docking calculations and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were combined to dock small molecules into protein receptors. We highlight successes to demonstrate what is possible now, but also point out drawbacks and future directions. The review is structured to lead the reader from the simpler to more compute-intensive methods. Thus, while inexpensive and fast docking algorithms can be used to scan large compound libraries and reduce their size, more accurate but expensive MD simulations can be applied when a few selected ligand candidates remain. MD simulations can be used: during the preparation of the protein receptor before docking, to optimize its structure and account for protein flexibility; for the refinement of docked complexes, to include solvent effects and account for induced fit; to calculate binding free energies, to provide an accurate ranking of the potential ligands; and in the latest developments, during the docking process itself to find the binding site and correctly dock the ligand a priori. (c) 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16758486     DOI: 10.1002/med.20067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Res Rev        ISSN: 0198-6325            Impact factor:   12.944


  120 in total

1.  Molecular simulation methods in drug discovery: a prospective outlook.

Authors:  Xavier Barril; F Javier Luque
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Correlation between biological activity and binding energy in systems of integrin with cyclic RGD-containing binders: a QM/MM molecular dynamics study.

Authors:  Mingli Xiang; Yuchun Lin; Gu He; Lijuan Chen; Mingli Yang; Shengyong Yang; Yirong Mo
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  Towards predictive docking at aminergic G-protein coupled receptors.

Authors:  Jan Jakubík; Esam E El-Fakahany; Vladimír Doležal
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 1.810

4.  Determination of minimal sequence for zearalenone aptamer by computational docking and application on an indirect competitive electrochemical aptasensor.

Authors:  Farah Asilah Azri; Jinap Selamat; Rashidah Sukor; Nor Azah Yusof; Nurul Hanun Ahmad Raston; Shimaa Eissa; Mohammed Zourob; Raja Chinnappan
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 4.142

5.  Ligand binding to the voltage-gated Kv1.5 potassium channel in the open state--docking and computer simulations of a homology model.

Authors:  Martin Andér; Victor B Luzhkov; Johan Aqvist
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-09-28       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Multiple-step virtual screening using VSM-G: overview and validation of fast geometrical matching enrichment.

Authors:  Alexandre Beautrait; Vincent Leroux; Matthieu Chavent; Léo Ghemtio; Marie-Dominique Devignes; Malika Smaïl-Tabbone; Wensheng Cai; Xuegang Shao; Gilles Moreau; Peter Bladon; Jianhua Yao; Bernard Maigret
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  Molecular dynamics and docking simulations as a proof of high flexibility in E. coli FabH and its relevance for accurate inhibitor modeling.

Authors:  Yunierkis Pérez-Castillo; Matheus Froeyen; Miguel Angel Cabrera-Pérez; Ann Nowé
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Molecular motions in drug design: the coming age of the metadynamics method.

Authors:  Xevi Biarnés; Salvatore Bongarzone; Attilio Vittorio Vargiu; Paolo Carloni; Paolo Ruggerone
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 9.  Development of an informatics infrastructure for data exchange of biomolecular simulations: Architecture, data models and ontology.

Authors:  J C Thibault; D R Roe; K Eilbeck; T E Cheatham; J C Facelli
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.000

10.  In vitro and in silico studies of 8(17),12E,14-labdatrien-18-oic acid in airways smooth muscle relaxation: new molecular insights about its mechanism of action.

Authors:  Edilson B Alencar Filho; Luciano A A Ribeiro; Thiego G C Carvalho; Fabrício S Silva; Luiz Antonio M S Duarte-Filho; Euzébio G Barbosa; Pedro M N Menezes; Josean F Tavares; Marcelo S da Silva; Bagnólia A Silva
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.