| Literature DB >> 32937888 |
Suzanne M de la Monte1,2,3,4,5, Natalia Moriel6, Amy Lin6, Nada Abdullah Tanoukhy6, Camille Homans7, Gina Gallucci4, Ming Tong4, Ayumi Saito8.
Abstract
Betel quid, traditionally prepared with areca nut, betel leaf, and slaked lime, has been consumed for thousands of years, mainly in the form of chewing. Originally used for cultural, medicinal, and ceremonial purposes mainly in South Asian countries, its use has recently spread across the globe due to its psychoactive, euphoric, and aphrodisiac properties. Now it is widely used as a social lubricant and source of financial profit. Unfortunately, the profit motive has led to high rates of habitual consumption with eventual conversion to addiction among young girls and boys. Moreover, the worrisome practice of including tobacco in quid preparations has grown, particularly among pregnant women. Major health concerns include increased rates of malignancy, oral pathology, and cardiovascular, hepatic, fertility, metabolic, and neuropsychiatric disorders. Metabolic disorders and insulin resistance disease states such as type 2 diabetes, obesity, and metabolic syndrome contribute to cognitive decline and neurodegeneration. Mechanistically, the constituents of areca nut/betel quid are metabolized to N-nitroso compounds, i.e., nitrosamines, which are carcinogenic at high doses and cause insulin resistance following chronic low-level exposures. From an epidemiological perspective, the rising tide of insulin resistance diseases including obesity, diabetes, and dementias that now disproportionately burden poor countries has been propagated by rapid commercialization and enhanced access to betel quid. Public health measures are needed to impose socially and ethically responsible barriers to yet another cause of global health disparity.Entities:
Keywords: arecoline; betel quid; dementia; diabetes; nitrosamine; tobacco
Year: 2020 PMID: 32937888 PMCID: PMC7558723 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17186690
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Areca nut production by country, 1990–2014.
| Territory | Production (mt) | Production (mt) | %Change | Production (mt) | %Change | Production (mt) | %Change | %Change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | %World | 2000 | %World | 1990–2000 | 2010 | % World | 2000–2010 | 2014 | %World | 2010–2014 | 1990–2014 | |
| World | 868,124.0 | 100.00 | 1,271,098.8 | 100.00 | 46.42 | 1,889,697.0 | 100.00 | 48.67 | 1,928,986.5 | 100.00 | 2.08 | 122.2 |
| India | 416,734.4 | 48.00 | 576,613.6 | 45.36 | 38.36 | 835,216.1 | 44.20 | 44.85 | 1,086,829.3 | 56.34 | 30.13 | 160.8 |
| China/Taiwan | 194,109.1 | 22.36 | 291,757.8 | 22.95 | 50.31 | 230,185.9 | 12.18 |
| 212,185.1 | 11.00 |
| 9.3 |
| Indonesia | 113,884.7 | 13.12 | 187,710.4 | 14.77 | 64.83 | 322,030.0 | 17.04 | 71.56 | 82,123.8 | 4.26 |
|
|
| Myanmar | 56,385.8 | 6.50 | 68,313.0 | 5.37 | 21.15 | 206,183.1 | 10.91 | 201.82 | 207,772.2 | 10.77 | 0.77 | 268.5 |
| Bangladesh | 39,768.9 | 4.58 | 78,629.1 | 6.19 | 97.72 | 160,195.5 | 8.48 | 103.74 | 178,226.0 | 9.24 | 11.26 | 348.2 |
| Thailand | 24,323.3 | 2.80 | 34,946.3 | 2.75 | 43.67 | 62,160.3 | 3.29 | 77.87 | 64,073.9 | 3.32 | 3.08 | 163.4 |
| Malaysia | 6989.3 | 0.81 | 5766.1 | 0.45 |
| 1135.8 | 0.06 |
| 643.0 | 0.03 |
|
|
| Sri Lanka | 5241.9 | 0.60 | 15,997.9 | 1.26 | 205.19 | 52,209.7 | 2.76 | 226.35 | 73,347.0 | 3.80 | 40.49 | 1299.2 |
| Bhutan | 4368.3 | 0.50 | 5416.7 | 0.43 | 24.00 | 12,720.4 | 0.67 | 134.84 | 16,581.3 | 0.86 | 30.35 | 279.6 |
| Nepal | 4193.6 | 0.48 | 5766.1 | 0.45 | 37.50 | 7454.0 | 0.39 | 29.27 | 7002.4 | 0.36 |
| 67.0 |
| Kenya | 186.1 | 0.02 | 157.3 | 0.01 |
| 195.7 | 0.01 | 24.45 | 197.3 | 0.01 | 0.82 | 6.0 |
| Maldives | 28.0 | 0.00 | 24.5 | 0.00 |
| 10.5 | 0.00 |
| 5.2 | 0.00 |
|
|
Data corresponding to areca nut production by country from 1990 to 2014 were extracted from the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations website. Total production data (gross production value constant 1000 1$) in 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2014 are shown for the world, 11 Asian countries, and 1 African nation. The calculated percentages of world production and percentage change in production during 1990–2000, 2000–2010, 2010–2014, and 1990–2014 are shown. The numbers in red font correspond to relative decline in Areca nut production within the specified intervals. Mt—metric tons
Areca nut production by Asian region, 1990–2014.
| Production (mt) | Production (mt) | %Change | Production (mt) | %Change | Production (mt) | %Change | %Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | %World | 2000 | %World | 1990–2000 | 2010 | %World | 2000–2010 | 2014 | %World | 2010–2014 | 1990–2014 | |
| World | 868,124 | 100 | 1,271,099 | 100 | 46.42 | 1,889,697 | 100 | 48.67 | 1,928,987 | 100 | 2.08 | 122.2 |
| Asia | 867,938 | 99.98 | 1,270,942 | 99.99 | 46.43 | 1,889,501 | 99.99 | 48.67 | 1,928,789 | 99.99 | 2.08 | 122.2 |
| Southern | 472,246 | 54.40 | 682,448 | 53.69 | 44.51 | 1,067,806 | 56.51 | 56.47 | 1,361,991 | 70.61 | 27.55 | 188.4 |
| South Eastern | 201,583 | 23.22 | 296,736 | 23.34 | 47.20 | 591,509 | 31.30 | 99.34 | 354,613 | 18.38 |
| 75.9 |
| Eastern | 194,109 | 22.36 | 291,758 | 22.95 | 50.31 | 230,186 | 12.18 |
| 212,185 | 11.00 |
| 9.3 |
| Africa | 186 | 0.02 | 157 | 0.01 | −15.48 | 196 | 0.01 | 24.45 | 197 | 0.01 | 0.82 | 6.0 |
Data corresponding to areca nut production by Asian region and compared with Africa and the world from 1990 to 2014 were extracted from the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations website. Total production data (gross production value constant 1000 1$) in 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2014 are shown for the world, Southern, South Eastern and Eastern Asian countries, and 1 African nation. The calculated percentages of world production and percentage change in production from 1990–2000, 2000–2010, 2010–2014, and 1990–2014 are shown. The numbers in red font correspond to relative declined in areca nut production within the specified intervals. Note virtually continuous growth in Asian regions and very low production in Africa.
Areca nut production by Asian economy, 1990–2014.
| Production (mt) | Production (mt) | %Change | Production (mt) | %Change | Production (mt) | %Change | %Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Economy | 1990 | % World | 2000 | % World | 1990–2000 | 2010 | % World | 2000–2010 | 2014 | % World | 2010–2014 | 1990–2014 |
| Low income | 463,259 | 53.36 | 661,166 | 52.02 | 42.72 | 1,003,061 | 53.08 | 51.71 | 1,272,255 | 65.95 | 26.84 | 174.6 |
| Food importer | 112,083 | 12.91 | 174,305 | 13.71 | 55.51 | 438,969 | 23.23 | 151.84 | 483,131 | 25.05 | 10.06 | 331.0 |
| Least developed | 106,627 | 12.28 | 158,125 | 12.44 | 48.30 | 386,553 | 20.46 | 144.46 | 409,582 | 21.23 | 5.96 | 284.1 |
| Land-locked | 8096 | 0.93 | 11,183 | 0.88 | 38.12 | 20,174 | 1.07 | 80.41 | 23,584 | 1.22 | 16.90 | 191.3 |
| Small island | 28 | 0.00 | 24 | 0.00 |
| 10 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 |
|
|
Data corresponding to areca nut production by Asian economy from 1990 to 2014 were extracted from the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations website. Low income = low income food deficit countries; Food importer = net food importing countries; Least developed = least developed countries; Land locked = land locked developing countries; Small island = small island of developing states. Total production data (gross production value constant 1000 1$) in 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2014 are shown for each economy. The calculated percentages of world production and percentage change in production from 1990–2000, 2000–2010, 2010–2014, and 1990–2014 are shown. The numbers in red font correspond to relative declined in Areca nut production within the specified intervals. Note virtually continuous growth in most economically challenged countries except for the small island developing states, which exhibited sharp declines in production.
Figure 1Comparisons of time-dependent increases in (A–E) areca nut production (gross production value constant 1000 1$) and (F–J) obesity rates among women (red) and men (blue) in (A,F) India, (B,G) China, (C,H) Bangladesh, (D,I) Thailand, and (E,J) Indonesia. Year over year data were extracted from the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations website.