Sungtak Hong1, KyungPyo Hong2, Austin E Culver1, Ashitha Pathrose1, Bradley D Allen1, Jane E Wilcox3, Daniel C Lee3, Daniel Kim4. 1. Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 737 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 1600, Chicago, IL 60611. 2. BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY. 3. Division of Cardiology, Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL. 4. Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 737 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 1600, Chicago, IL 60611. Electronic address: daniel.kim3@northwestern.edu.
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To develop a 16-fold accelerated real-time, free-breathing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) pulse sequence with compressed sensing reconstruction and test whether it is capable of producing clinically acceptable summed visual scores (SVS) and accurate left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 16-fold accelerated real-time cine CMR pulse sequence was developed using gradient echo readout, Cartesian k-space sampling, and compressed sensing. We scanned 13 CIED patients (mean age = 59 years; 9/4 males/females) using clinical standard, breath-hold cine and real-time, free-breathing cine. Two clinical readers performed a visual assessment of image quality in four categories (conspicuity of endocardial wall at end diastole, temporal fidelity of wall motion, any artifact level on the heart, noise) using a five-point Likert scale (1: worst; 3: clinically acceptable; 5: best). SVS was calculated as the sum of 4 individual scores, where 12 was defined as clinical acceptable. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare SVS, and the Bland-Altman analysis was conducted to evaluate the agreement of LVEF. RESULTS: Median scan time was 3.7 times shorter for real-time (3.5 heartbeats per slice) than clinical standard (13 heartbeats per slice, excluding nonscanning time between successive breath-hold acquisitions). Median SVS was not significantly different between clinical standard (15.0) and real-time (14.5). The mean difference in LVEF was -2% (4.7% of mean), and the limits of agreement was 5.8% (13.5% of mean). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the proposed real-time cine method produces clinically acceptable SVS and relatively accurate LVEF in CIED patients.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To develop a 16-fold accelerated real-time, free-breathing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) pulse sequence with compressed sensing reconstruction and test whether it is capable of producing clinically acceptable summed visual scores (SVS) and accurate left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 16-fold accelerated real-time cine CMR pulse sequence was developed using gradient echo readout, Cartesian k-space sampling, and compressed sensing. We scanned 13 CIED patients (mean age = 59 years; 9/4 males/females) using clinical standard, breath-hold cine and real-time, free-breathing cine. Two clinical readers performed a visual assessment of image quality in four categories (conspicuity of endocardial wall at end diastole, temporal fidelity of wall motion, any artifact level on the heart, noise) using a five-point Likert scale (1: worst; 3: clinically acceptable; 5: best). SVS was calculated as the sum of 4 individual scores, where 12 was defined as clinical acceptable. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare SVS, and the Bland-Altman analysis was conducted to evaluate the agreement of LVEF. RESULTS: Median scan time was 3.7 times shorter for real-time (3.5 heartbeats per slice) than clinical standard (13 heartbeats per slice, excluding nonscanning time between successive breath-hold acquisitions). Median SVS was not significantly different between clinical standard (15.0) and real-time (14.5). The mean difference in LVEF was -2% (4.7% of mean), and the limits of agreement was 5.8% (13.5% of mean). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the proposed real-time cine method produces clinically acceptable SVS and relatively accurate LVEF in CIED patients.
Authors: Amita Singh; Keigo Kawaji; Neha Goyal; Noreen T Nazir; Andrew Beaser; Virginia O'Keefe-Baker; Karima Addetia; Roderick Tung; Peng Hu; Victor Mor-Avi; Amit R Patel Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Hassan Haji-Valizadeh; Amir A Rahsepar; Jeremy D Collins; Elwin Bassett; Tamara Isakova; Tobias Block; Ganesh Adluru; Edward V R DiBella; Daniel C Lee; James C Carr; Daniel Kim Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-09-17 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Robert J Russo; Heather S Costa; Patricia D Silva; Jeffrey L Anderson; Aysha Arshad; Robert W W Biederman; Noel G Boyle; Jennifer V Frabizzio; Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green; Steven L Higgins; Rachel Lampert; Christian E Machado; Edward T Martin; Andrew L Rivard; Jason C Rubenstein; Raymond H M Schaerf; Jennifer D Schwartz; Dipan J Shah; Gery F Tomassoni; Gail T Tominaga; Allison E Tonkin; Seth Uretsky; Steven D Wolff Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-02-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ruixi Zhou; Yang Yang; Roshin C Mathew; John P Mugler; Daniel S Weller; Christopher M Kramer; Abdul Haseeb Ahmed; Mathews Jacob; Michael Salerno Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-04-21 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Li Feng; Monvadi B Srichai; Ruth P Lim; Alexis Harrison; Wilson King; Ganesh Adluru; Edward V R Dibella; Daniel K Sodickson; Ricardo Otazo; Daniel Kim Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-08-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: KyungPyo Hong; Jeremy D Collins; Benjamin H Freed; Lexiaozi Fan; Andrew E Arai; Li-Yueh Hsu; Daniel C Lee; Daniel Kim Journal: Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging Date: 2020-04-16
Authors: Osman Akdag; Stefano Mandija; Astrid L H M W van Lier; Pim T S Borman; Tim Schakel; Eveline Alberts; Oscar van der Heide; Rutger J Hassink; Joost J C Verhoeff; Firdaus A A Mohamed Hoesein; Bas W Raaymakers; Martin F Fast Journal: Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Date: 2022-03-09