Hassan Haji-Valizadeh1,2, Amir A Rahsepar2, Jeremy D Collins2, Elwin Bassett3, Tamara Isakova4, Tobias Block5, Ganesh Adluru6, Edward V R DiBella6, Daniel C Lee2,7, James C Carr2, Daniel Kim2. 1. Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 3. Physics Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. 4. Division of Nephrology, Internal Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 5. Department of Radiology, New York University, New York, New York, USA. 6. Department of Radiology and Imaging Science, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. 7. Division of Cardiology, Internal Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To validate an optimal 12-fold accelerated real-time cine MRI pulse sequence with radial k-space sampling and compressed sensing (CS) in patients at 1.5T and 3T. METHODS: We used two strategies to reduce image artifacts arising from gradient delays and eddy currents in radial k-space sampling with balanced steady-state free precession readout. We validated this pulse sequence against a standard breath-hold cine sequence in two patient cohorts: a myocardial infarction (n = 16) group at 1.5T and chronic kidney disease group (n = 18) at 3T. Two readers independently performed visual analysis of 68 cine sets in four categories (myocardial definition, temporal fidelity, artifact, noise) on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = nondiagnostic, 2 = poor, 3 = adequate or moderate, 4 = good, 5 = excellent). Another reader calculated left ventricular (LV) functional parameters, including ejection fraction. RESULTS: Compared with standard cine, real-time cine produced nonsignificantly different visually assessed scores, except for the following categories: 1) temporal fidelity scores were significantly lower (P = 0.013) for real-time cine at both field strengths, 2) artifacts scores were significantly higher (P = 0.013) for real-time cine at both field strengths, and 3) noise scores were significantly (P = 0.013) higher for real-time cine at 1.5T. Standard and real-time cine pulse sequences produced LV functional parameters that were in good agreement (e.g., absolute mean difference in ejection fraction <4%). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that an optimal 12-fold, accelerated, real-time cine MRI pulse sequence using radial k-space sampling and CS produces good to excellent visual scores and relatively accurate LV functional parameters in patients at 1.5T and 3T. Magn Reson Med 79:2745-2751, 2018.
PURPOSE: To validate an optimal 12-fold accelerated real-time cine MRI pulse sequence with radial k-space sampling and compressed sensing (CS) in patients at 1.5T and 3T. METHODS: We used two strategies to reduce image artifacts arising from gradient delays and eddy currents in radial k-space sampling with balanced steady-state free precession readout. We validated this pulse sequence against a standard breath-hold cine sequence in two patient cohorts: a myocardial infarction (n = 16) group at 1.5T and chronic kidney disease group (n = 18) at 3T. Two readers independently performed visual analysis of 68 cine sets in four categories (myocardial definition, temporal fidelity, artifact, noise) on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = nondiagnostic, 2 = poor, 3 = adequate or moderate, 4 = good, 5 = excellent). Another reader calculated left ventricular (LV) functional parameters, including ejection fraction. RESULTS: Compared with standard cine, real-time cine produced nonsignificantly different visually assessed scores, except for the following categories: 1) temporal fidelity scores were significantly lower (P = 0.013) for real-time cine at both field strengths, 2) artifacts scores were significantly higher (P = 0.013) for real-time cine at both field strengths, and 3) noise scores were significantly (P = 0.013) higher for real-time cine at 1.5T. Standard and real-time cine pulse sequences produced LV functional parameters that were in good agreement (e.g., absolute mean difference in ejection fraction <4%). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that an optimal 12-fold, accelerated, real-time cine MRI pulse sequence using radial k-space sampling and CS produces good to excellent visual scores and relatively accurate LV functional parameters in patients at 1.5T and 3T. Magn Reson Med 79:2745-2751, 2018.
Authors: Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-06-08 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Juliane Goebel; Felix Nensa; Haemi P Schemuth; Stefan Maderwald; Harald H Quick; Thomas Schlosser; Kai Nassenstein Journal: Acta Radiol Date: 2016-01-01 Impact factor: 1.990
Authors: Vivek Muthurangu; Philip Lurz; Jeffery D Critchely; John E Deanfield; Andrew M Taylor; Michael S Hansen Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-07-15 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Li Feng; Robert Grimm; Kai Tobias Block; Hersh Chandarana; Sungheon Kim; Jian Xu; Leon Axel; Daniel K Sodickson; Ricardo Otazo Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-10-18 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Tevfik F Ismail; Wendy Strugnell; Chiara Coletti; Maša Božić-Iven; Sebastian Weingärtner; Kerstin Hammernik; Teresa Correia; Thomas Küstner Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-03-03
Authors: KyungPyo Hong; Jeremy D Collins; Benjamin H Freed; Lexiaozi Fan; Andrew E Arai; Li-Yueh Hsu; Daniel C Lee; Daniel Kim Journal: Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging Date: 2020-04-16
Authors: Sungtak Hong; KyungPyo Hong; Austin E Culver; Ashitha Pathrose; Bradley D Allen; Jane E Wilcox; Daniel C Lee; Daniel Kim Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2020-09-02 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Daming Shen; Sushobhan Ghosh; Hassan Haji-Valizadeh; Ashitha Pathrose; Florian Schiffers; Daniel C Lee; Benjamin H Freed; Michael Markl; Oliver S Cossairt; Aggelos K Katsaggelos; Daniel Kim Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 4.044