Literature DB >> 30739658

Feasibility of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Wideband Protocol in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators and Its Utility for Defining Scar.

Amita Singh1, Keigo Kawaji1, Neha Goyal1, Noreen T Nazir1, Andrew Beaser1, Virginia O'Keefe-Baker1, Karima Addetia1, Roderick Tung1, Peng Hu2, Victor Mor-Avi1, Amit R Patel3.   

Abstract

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have been a relative contraindication to cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Although cardiovascular magnetic resonance provides valuable information regarding scar in patients with ventricular arrhythmias or cardiomyopathy, ICDs in these patients frequently cause artifacts hindering accurate interpretation of both cine and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) images. We sought to quantify the frequency and severity of artifact on LGE images and assess whether a modified wideband LGE protocol could improve the diagnostic yield of scar identification in agreement with invasive electroanatomic mapping (EAM). Forty-nine patients with ICDs and ventricular tachycardia (VT) or cardiomyopathy underwent CMR (Philips 1.5T), including standard and wideband LGE imaging. A safety algorithm was followed throughout the protocol. Standard and wideband LGE short-axis images were graded using an artifact score on a per-slice basis. LGE on wideband images was compared with EAM in 27 of 49 patients who underwent VT ablation. There were no adverse patient- or device-related events. With standard LGE imaging, 84% of patients demonstrated some degree of hyperenhancement artifact, which persisted in 22% on wideband LGE but with much less extent. Wideband LGE imaging resulted in an increase from 48% to 94% diagnostic-quality slices, with a significant reduction in artifact score, and correlated with EAM in 21 of 27 patients (78%). In conclusion, assessment of standard LGE is markedly limited by artifact in patients with ICD. The use of wideband LGE significantly improves image quality and can accurately localize myocardial scar before VT ablation.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30739658      PMCID: PMC8240651          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.01.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  25 in total

1.  Safety, feasibility, and diagnostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverters/defibrillators at 1.5 T.

Authors:  Claas P Naehle; Jens Kreuz; Katharina Strach; Jörg Otto Schwab; Simon Pingel; Roger Luechinger; Rolf Fimmers; Hans Schild; Daniel Thomas
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 2.  Late Gadolinium Enhancement and the Risk for Ventricular Arrhythmias or Sudden Death in Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Di Marco; Ignasi Anguera; Matthias Schmitt; Igor Klem; Tomas G Neilan; James A White; Marek Sramko; Pier Giorgio Masci; Andrea Barison; Peter Mckenna; Ify Mordi; Kristina H Haugaa; Francisco Leyva; Jorge Rodriguez Capitán; Hiroshi Satoh; Takeru Nabeta; Paolo Domenico Dallaglio; Niall G Campbell; Xavier Sabaté; Ángel Cequier
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 12.035

3.  Magnetic resonance assessment of the substrate for inducible ventricular tachycardia in nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Saman Nazarian; David A Bluemke; Albert C Lardo; Menekhem M Zviman; Stanley P Watkins; Timm L Dickfeld; Glenn R Meininger; Ariel Roguin; Hugh Calkins; Gordon F Tomaselli; Robert G Weiss; Ronald D Berger; João A C Lima; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Modified wideband three-dimensional late gadolinium enhancement MRI for patients with implantable cardiac devices.

Authors:  Shams Rashid; Stanislas Rapacchi; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Adam Plotnik; J Paul Finn; Peng Hu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Outcomes in catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in dilated nonischemic cardiomyopathy compared with ischemic cardiomyopathy: results from the Prospective Heart Centre of Leipzig VT (HELP-VT) Study.

Authors:  Borislav Dinov; Lukas Fiedler; Robert Schönbauer; Andreas Bollmann; Sascha Rolf; Christopher Piorkowski; Gerhard Hindricks; Arash Arya
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Implantation trends and patient profiles for pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators in the United States: 1993-2006.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Jorge A Ochoa; Edmund Lau; Yakov Shkolnikov; Behzad B Pavri; Daniel Frisch; Arnold J Greenspon
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 7.  Myocardial Fibrosis Assessment by LGE Is a Powerful Predictor of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Ischemic and Nonischemic LV Dysfunction: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Marcello Disertori; Marta Rigoni; Nicola Pace; Giancarlo Casolo; Michela Masè; Lucio Gonzini; Donata Lucci; Giandomenico Nollo; Flavia Ravelli
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-07-20

8.  Device artifact reduction for magnetic resonance imaging of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and ventricular tachycardia: late gadolinium enhancement correlation with electroanatomic mapping.

Authors:  Steven M Stevens; Roderick Tung; Shams Rashid; Jean Gima; Shelly Cote; Geraldine Pavez; Sarah Khan; Daniel B Ennis; J Paul Finn; Noel Boyle; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Peng Hu
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 6.343

9.  Long-term Outcomes of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Different Types of Structural Heart Disease.

Authors:  Jackson J Liang; Pasquale Santangeli; David J Callans
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2015-12-01

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implanted electronic devices: focus on contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging protocols.

Authors:  Laura Horwood; Anil Attili; Frank Luba; El-Sayed H Ibrahim; Hemant Parmar; Jadranka Stojanovska; Sharon Gadoth-Goodman; Carey Fette; Hakan Oral; Frank Bogun
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 5.214

View more
  11 in total

1.  Prevalence of newly diagnosed sarcoidosis in patients with ventricular arrhythmias: a cardiac magnetic resonance and 18F-FDG cardiac PET study.

Authors:  Kalie Y Kebed; Spencer V Carter; Erin Flatley; R Parker Ward; Joshua D Moss; Daniel E Appelbaum; Amita Singh; Roberto M Lang; Roderick Tung; Amit R Patel
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  [Safe MRI examinations in patients with pacemakers and ICD].

Authors:  D Beitzke
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  Role of Cardiac MRI Imaging of Focal and Diffuse Inflammation and Fibrosis in Cardiomyopathy Patients Who Have Pacemakers/ICD Devices.

Authors:  Ananna Zaman; Samantha Zhao; Jordana Kron; Antonio Abbate; Anna Tomdio; W Gregory Hundley; Jennifer H Jordan
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.955

4.  Reducing cardiac implantable electronic device-induced artefacts in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Aino-Maija Vuorinen; Lauri Lehmonen; Jarkko Karvonen; Miia Holmström; Sari Kivistö; Touko Kaasalainen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 7.034

5.  Accelerated Wideband Myocardial Perfusion Pulse Sequence with Compressed Sensing Reconstruction for Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification in Patients with a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device.

Authors:  KyungPyo Hong; Jeremy D Collins; Benjamin H Freed; Lexiaozi Fan; Andrew E Arai; Li-Yueh Hsu; Daniel C Lee; Daniel Kim
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2020-04-16

6.  Impact of Wideband Late Gadolinium Enhancement Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Device-Related Artifacts in Different Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Types.

Authors:  Amita Singh; Wensu Chen; Hena N Patel; Nazia Alvi; Keigo Kawaji; Stephanie A Besser; Roderick Tung; Jiangang Zou; Roberto M Lang; Victor Mor-Avi; Amit R Patel
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance septal late gadolinium enhancement patterns for periaortic ventricular tachycardia ablation: Heterogeneity of the anteroseptal substrate in nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Takuro Nishimura; Hena N Patel; Shuo Wang; Gaurav A Upadhyay; Heather L Smith; Cevher Ozcan; Dalise Y Shatz; Hemal M Nayak; Amit R Patel; Roderick Tung
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 6.343

8.  Highly Accelerated Real-Time Free-Breathing Cine CMR for Patients With a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device.

Authors:  Sungtak Hong; KyungPyo Hong; Austin E Culver; Ashitha Pathrose; Bradley D Allen; Jane E Wilcox; Daniel C Lee; Daniel Kim
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Evaluation of image quality of wideband single-shot late gadolinium-enhancement MRI in patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device.

Authors:  Sarah M Schwartz; Ashitha Pathrose; Ali M Serhal; Ann B Ragin; Jessica Charron; Bradley P Knight; Rod S Passman; Ryan J Avery; Daniel Kim
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-11-13

10.  Clinical experience regarding safety and diagnostic value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with a subcutaneous implanted cardioverter/defibrillator (S-ICD) at 1.5 T.

Authors:  Viktoria Holtstiege; Claudia Meier; Michael Bietenbeck; Grigorios Chatzantonis; Anca Florian; Julia Köbe; Florian Reinke; Lars Eckardt; Ali Yilmaz
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.