Literature DB >> 32420548

Accelerated Wideband Myocardial Perfusion Pulse Sequence with Compressed Sensing Reconstruction for Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification in Patients with a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device.

KyungPyo Hong1, Jeremy D Collins1, Benjamin H Freed1, Lexiaozi Fan1, Andrew E Arai1, Li-Yueh Hsu1, Daniel C Lee1, Daniel Kim1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop an accelerated wideband cardiac perfusion pulse sequence and test whether it can produce diagnostically acceptable image quality and whether it can be used to reliably quantify myocardial blood flow (MBF) in patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A fivefold-accelerated wideband perfusion pulse sequence was developed using compressed sensing to sample one arterial input function plane and three myocardial perfusion (MP) planes per heartbeat in patients with a CIED with heart rates as high as 102 beats per minute. Resting perfusion scans were performed in 10 patients with a CIED and in 10 patients with no device as a control group. Two clinical readers compared the resulting images and retrospective images of the 10 patients with a CIED, which were obtained by using a previously described twofold-accelerated wideband perfusion pulse sequence with temporal generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition. Summed visual score (SVS) was defined as the sum of conspicuity, artifact, and noise scores individually ranging from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). Resting MBF in the remote zones was quantified using Fermi deconvolution.
RESULTS: Median SVS was significantly different (P < .05) between the prospective and retrospective CIED groups (13 vs nine) and between the nondevice group and the retrospective CIED group (13.5 vs nine); all median SVSs were nine or greater (clinically acceptable cut point). The median resting MBF in remote zones was not significantly different (P = .27) between patients with a CIED (1.1 mL/min/g; median left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF], 52.5%) and patients with no device (1.3 mL/min/g; median LVEF, 64.0%). Mean MBF values were consistent with those (mean resting MBF range, 1.0-1.2 mL/min/g) reported by two prior state-of-the-art cardiac perfusion MRI studies.
CONCLUSION: The proposed scan yielded diagnostically acceptable image quality and enabled reliable quantification of MBF with three MP planes per heartbeat in patients with a CIED with heart rates as high as 102 beats per minute. Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2020. 2020 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32420548      PMCID: PMC7207204          DOI: 10.1148/ryct.2020190114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging        ISSN: 2638-6135


  29 in total

1.  Absolute myocardial perfusion in canines measured by using dual-bolus first-pass MR imaging.

Authors:  Timothy F Christian; Dan W Rettmann; Anthony H Aletras; Steve L Liao; Joni L Taylor; Robert S Balaban; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Theory-based signal calibration with single-point T1 measurements for first-pass quantitative perfusion MRI studies.

Authors:  Alexandru Cernicanu; Leon Axel
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Temporally constrained reconstruction of dynamic cardiac perfusion MRI.

Authors:  Ganesh Adluru; Suyash P Awate; Tolga Tasdizen; Ross T Whitaker; Edward V R Dibella
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  A Deep Cascade of Convolutional Neural Networks for Dynamic MR Image Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jo Schlemper; Jose Caballero; Joseph V Hajnal; Anthony N Price; Daniel Rueckert
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cardiac Devices.

Authors:  Saman Nazarian; Rozann Hansford; Amir A Rahsepar; Valeria Weltin; Diana McVeigh; Esra Gucuk Ipek; Alan Kwan; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Albert C Lardo; Michael A Kraut; Ihab R Kamel; Stefan L Zimmerman; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Clinical utility and safety of a protocol for noncardiac and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of patients with permanent pacemakers and implantable-cardioverter defibrillators at 1.5 tesla.

Authors:  Saman Nazarian; Ariel Roguin; Menekhem M Zviman; Albert C Lardo; Timm L Dickfeld; Hugh Calkins; Robert G Weiss; Ronald D Berger; David A Bluemke; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Validation of highly accelerated real-time cardiac cine MRI with radial k-space sampling and compressed sensing in patients at 1.5T and 3T.

Authors:  Hassan Haji-Valizadeh; Amir A Rahsepar; Jeremy D Collins; Elwin Bassett; Tamara Isakova; Tobias Block; Ganesh Adluru; Edward V R DiBella; Daniel C Lee; James C Carr; Daniel Kim
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-09-17       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Myocardial T1 mapping for patients with implanted cardiac devices using wideband inversion recovery spoiled gradient echo readout.

Authors:  Jiaxin Shao; Shams Rashid; Pierangelo Renella; Kim-Lien Nguyen; Peng Hu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.737

9.  Feasibility and safety of adenosine cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with MR conditional pacemaker systems at 1.5 Tesla.

Authors:  Oliver Klein-Wiele; Marietta Garmer; Rhyan Urbien; Martin Busch; Kaffer Kara; Serban Mateiescu; Dietrich Grönemeyer; Michael Schulte-Hermes; Marc Garbrecht; Birgit Hailer
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Diagnostic Performance of Fully Automated Pixel-Wise Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Imaging by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Authors:  Li-Yueh Hsu; Matthew Jacobs; Mitchel Benovoy; Allison D Ta; Hannah M Conn; Susanne Winkler; Anders M Greve; Marcus Y Chen; Sujata M Shanbhag; W Patricia Bandettini; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-02-14
View more
  4 in total

1.  Hemodynamic response and safety of vasodilator stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with permanent pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Authors:  Lauren Miller; Sergei Airapetov; Ajay Pillai; Gautham Kalahasty; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; W Gregory Hundley; Cory R Trankle
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  A theoretical framework for retrospective T 2 correction to the arterial input function in quantitative myocardial perfusion MRI.

Authors:  Lexiaozi Fan; Bradley D Allen; Austin E Culver; Li-Yueh Hsu; Kyungpyo Hong; Brandon C Benefield; James C Carr; Daniel C Lee; Daniel Kim
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.737

3.  Highly Accelerated Real-Time Free-Breathing Cine CMR for Patients With a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device.

Authors:  Sungtak Hong; KyungPyo Hong; Austin E Culver; Ashitha Pathrose; Bradley D Allen; Jane E Wilcox; Daniel C Lee; Daniel Kim
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Evaluation of image quality of wideband single-shot late gadolinium-enhancement MRI in patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device.

Authors:  Sarah M Schwartz; Ashitha Pathrose; Ali M Serhal; Ann B Ragin; Jessica Charron; Bradley P Knight; Rod S Passman; Ryan J Avery; Daniel Kim
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-11-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.