| Literature DB >> 32882437 |
Susana Pinto1, Stefano Quintarelli2, Vincenzo Silani3.
Abstract
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a fast-progressive neurodegenerative disease leading to progressive physical immobility with usually normal or mild cognitive and/or behavioural involvement. Many patients are relatively young, instructed, sensitive to new technologies, and professionally active when developing the first symptoms. Older patients usually require more time, encouragement, reinforcement and a closer support but, nevertheless, selecting user-friendly devices, provided earlier in the course of the disease, and engaging motivated carers may overcome many technological barriers. ALS may be considered a model for neurodegenerative diseases to further develop and test new technologies. From multidisciplinary teleconsults to telemonitoring of the respiratory function, telemedicine has the potentiality to embrace other fields, including nutrition, physical mobility, and the interaction with the environment. Brain-computer interfaces and eye tracking expanded the field of augmentative and alternative communication in ALS but their potentialities go beyond communication, to cognition and robotics. Virtual reality and different forms of artificial intelligence present further interesting possibilities that deserve to be investigated. COVID-19 pandemic is an unprecedented opportunity to speed up the development and implementation of new technologies in clinical practice, improving the daily living of both ALS patients and carers. The present work reviews the current technologies for ALS patients already in place or being under evaluation with published publications, prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic.Entities:
Keywords: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Artificial intelligence; Brain-computer interfaces; COVID-19; Eye-tracking; Robotics; Telemedicine; Virtual reality
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32882437 PMCID: PMC7403097 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.117081
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurol Sci ISSN: 0022-510X Impact factor: 3.181
Fig. 1A BCI session - the BCI version of Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices exemplifying the potential application of new technologies in providing tools for diagnosis and cognitive rehabilitation of ALS patients.
Courtesy of Barbara Poletti.
Other emerging technologies being tested in ALS.
| Touch screen mobile phone/ ipad (symbols/ words, frequently used words/ phrases, text prediction, synthesized speech), internet | 26 bulbar-onset ALS pts. (27 recruited); 17 carers | Early stage | 7–10 months | Positive effects in performance and QoL for pts. and carers if " "users" as compared to "non-users" | Number of hours per day of use not assessed. | [ |
| ET (ERICA) | 15 ALS pts | Different stages | nd | Good performance in all but 1. | Impaired eyelid control limits usage; Oculomotor apraxia demands extra hours of training; | [ |
| ET | 35 ALS pts | Late-stage | One time questionnaire | Improvement in communication ability, QoL; patients' satisfaction | nd | [ |
| ET | 30 ALS pts | Late-stage, non-demented | One time questionnaire | Valuable for those using it for 15 months (median). Daily usage: 300 min (100–720). | Oculomotor impairment and eye-gaze fatigue may limit its functional usage | [ |
| ET | 20 ALS pts.; 20 carers | Late stage | nd | Improvement in QoL of pts. Decreased carers' burden (10pts.). | To bulky to move with wheelchair. Oculomotor impairment/ nystagmus limit usage; costs | [ |
| ET | 11 ALS pts. (30 screened); 9 next of kin | Late-stage | One time questionnaire | Feasible. Pts reported good QoL, at the cost of their next of kin QoL. Next of kin and pts.' QoL rated similarly by next of kin (different relevant identified areas) | nd | [ |
| ET | 19 ALS pts. (out of 25 respondents); 19 carers | Late-stage | One time questionnaire | 9 answered by ET, 3 by ET and eye-blink, 6 by eye-blink and 1 verbally. Only 1 regular ET-user and 1 previous user. Both feasible. Pts. reported good QoL and non-significant depression, underestimated by carers, and willingness to maintain life sustain measures | nd | [ |
| BCI, non-invasive, visual and/or P300-based | 3 ALS pts.; | Different stages, but retaining communication | 6 weeks (10 sessions) | Feasible as a non-muscular communication device. Higher accuracies and speed in visual and visual+ auditory modalities | nd | [ |
| BCI, non-invasive, P300-based matrix speller | 6 ALS pts. (8 recruited) | Late-stage | 40 weeks | Home stable performance in communication producing both cued and spontaneous text. | High required expert supervision and time for setup/ cleanup. Slow speed of online usage. Home electrical noise impacts the recordings. Algorithm did not discriminating desirable EEG characters in 1. | [ |
| BCI, non-invasive, P-300 based | 21 ALS pts, ; 5 assessed longitudinally | Early and middle stages | 12 months, initial training period | BCI skills, including cognitive abilities, maintained overtime | Higher motivation only if higher immediate benefit. | [ |
| BCI, non-invasive, P300-based (Wadsworth BCI home system, 8- and 16-channel montage); telemedicine | 17 ALS pts. (25 recruited) | Late-stage | One time evaluation | Feasible. Good BCI accuracies, despite disease severity, age, EEG montages or recording quality. | No accuracy improvement by the 16-channel montage.. | [ |
| BCI, non-invasive, P-300 based (Wadsworth BCI home system, 8-channel); telemedicine | 27 ALS pts | Late-stage | 12–18 months, initial training period | Reliable. Useful. | Rare technical problems | [ |
| BCI, non-invasive, P300-based; | 11 ALS pts. (2 with bulbar-onset), 1 pt. with Duchenne muscular dystrophy | Different stages, from Early to late-stages | 2 sessions for BCI and 2 for ET | ET: faster and more accurate, with higher information transfer rate, more satisfying device for pts., requiring less cognitive workload, and less time consuming | [ | |
| EOG; | 1 ALS pts | Late-stage | 3 sessions for EOG and BCI, 1 for ET | Cost, communication speed, carer’ burden: lower for ET, medium for EOG and high for BCI. | [ | |
| BCI, invasive (subdural electrocorticographic electrodes); | 1 ALS pt | Late-stage | 36 months | BCI high consistent performance, increasing steadily overtime, replacing ET in unfavourable light conditions. | BCI: Slight impedance increase until month 5; slowly decline of the power in the high frequency band. | [ |
| ET (Eye Link 1000) | 1 bulbar-onset ALS pt.; | Late-stage | Evaluation sessions | ET perceived as more usable. No negative affective state or anxiety with BCI or ET but a small anxiety increase after BCI in controls. | Good BCI calibration is critical. Performance influenced by type of virtual keyboard used [ | [ |
| ET | 48 ALS pts.; | Late stage | Evaluation sessions | Feasible. | nd | |
| ET (Eye Link 1000) | 21 ALS pts.; | Non-demented and non terminal-ill | Two sessions within a week for each subject | Feasible. Good levels of diagnostic accuracy and usability in both groups. | Verbal fluency assessments by ET required further adjustments. | [ |
| ET (Eye Link 1000) | 21 ALS pts.; | Non-demented and non terminal-ill | Two sessions within a week for each subject | Successful discrimination between pts.- controls, mainly in execution times. Lower prevalence of perseverative errors, than other error-types. | Non evaluation of ALS pts. in late stages of disease, including with major respiratory involvement. Small bulbar-onset pts. included and without major cognitive involvement. | [ |
| BCI, non-invasive, SCPs EEG | 2 ALS pts. [ | Late-stage | Training sessions and a evaluation session | Feasible. | Ability to control the SCP of the EEG is a prerequisite skill, which may take weeks, and may not be learnt. Not useful for tasks based on recall or for choices among more than 2 stimuli. [ | [ |
| BCI, non-invasive, P300-based | 15 ALS pts.; | Non-demented and non terminal-ill | Evaluation sessions | Feasible. High calibration accuracy, usability satisfaction and sensitivity, independent from disease onset/ progression, anxiety/ depression or respiratory involvement. | Non evaluation of pts. in late stages of disease, including with major respiratory involvement. Small bulbar-onset pts. included and without major cognitive involvement. | [ |
| Robot tele-operated using a joystick and buttons | 20 ALS pts. (21 recruited) | Different stages, non terminal-ill | One evaluation session | High overall satisfaction (6.7/7). | Space and time needed.Fixed robot. Probable greater challenges in “real” environments.Difficult to control when delivering objects to pts | [ |
| Humanoid robot | 4 ALS pts.; 4 controls | Late-stage, non-demented | 3 sessions for each | Easy. Comfortable. Task completed in 3 pts. and all controls. Tested at home in 3 pts. | Motivation impacts successful control of the robot. Unavaible data of the performance in non-controlled environments and at distance. | [ |
| Power wheelchair prototype | 12 ALS pts | Different stages. No cognitive impairment, significant neck paresis, significant respiratory involvement, or nystagmus | 3 trials | Feasible. Safe. Potential to improve mobility and independence in ALS. | Pts who committed errors were older (not related to clinical deterioration or glasses' usage). | [ |
| Robotic dynamic neck brace | 11 ALS pts.; | Different stages | One-time assessment (3 motions in each plane, each done in a cycle, for 5 times at self- selected speeds) | Wearable. Comfortable, ff f Feasible to assess head drop and disease progression. Head in ALS: Fails forward quicker, requires early extensor muscle activation for deceleration. Longer recruitment of splenius capitis in lateral bending and | One-size brace | [ |
| KINARM robot | 16 ALS pts., | Different stages, frontotemporal dementia was not an exclusion criteria | One time assessment | Feasible to assess cognition, sensorimotor and proprioception. | Pain or discomfort from the robot's seat or arm position) . | [ |
| Exoskeleton training supported with virtual reality + conventional physiotherapy (task-oriented) | 1 pt. with flail-arm | Early-stage | 2 months | Improvement right UL strength as compared to the initially stronger left UL | No stablished protocols, no usual access to this rehabilitation devices. | [ |
For Abbreviations, please see refer to Abbreviation section.
Proposed conditions for when to seek physical contact with the medical personnel at health facilities vs when to maintain remote contact.
| Contact with medical personal at health facilities | |
| Neurological status | First consult, diagnostic EMG, exclusion image exams |
| Rapid clinical deterioration | |
| Intractable spasticity associated with pain | |
| Advanced life directives discussion and end-of-life interventions | |
| Respiratory status | De novo respiratory symptoms |
| Adaptation to NIV | |
| Intolerance to NIV | |
| Tracheostomy intervention | |
| Respiratory decompensation (respiratory infections) | |
| Respiratory emergencies (aspiration, pulmonary embolism) | |
| Bulbar/ Nutritional status | Frequent swallowing problems with coughing/ choking |
| Rapid weight loss | |
| Dehydration | |
| Gastrostomy intervention | |
| Adaptation to AAC | |
| Limb status | Venous thrombosis |
| Falls and fractures | |
| Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder with pain | |
| Intractable spasticity associated with pain | |
| Other medical conditions | Fecaloma |
| Other acute medical conditions requiring interventive measures (diagnostic and/or therapeutic) | |
| Optimal remote visit in ALS | |
| Neurological status | Regular follow-up consults |
| Functional scales including ALSFRS-R, and QoL scales | |
| Therapeutic prescriptions | |
| Patient/carer support | |
| Respiratory status | Regular evaluation of the presence of respiratory symptoms/signs of respiratory involvement |
| Respiratory tests if available (nocturnal pulse oxymetry, home spirometry, peak expiratory flow) | |
| Regular NIV follow-up | |
| Bulbar/ Nutritional status | Regular evaluation of bulbar symptoms with impact on the nutritional status |
| Nutritional tests (weight recordings, caloric and hydric intake recordings, energy expendure) | |
| Regular follow-up on gastrostomy care | |
| Speech recordings | |
| AAC training | |
| Cognitive status | Regular assessments, including emotional lability and cognitive-behavioural involvement |
| Regular cognitive training | |
| Limb status | Regular assessment (mobility and posture including with sensors if available, fasciculations, cramps, muscle atrophy, retractions, skin lesions, limb oedema) |
| Regular evalution of maximal articular amplitudes performed actively | |
| Muscle strenght evaluation (subjectively as for localized weakness of the neck, hands, etc., and objectively if a home dynamometer is available) | |
| Other medical conditions | Regular checking on the stability of other medical conditions |
For Abbreviations, please refer to “Abbreviations” section.