| Literature DB >> 32761254 |
Helena B Thomaides-Brears1, Rita Lepe2, Rajarshi Banerjee3, Carlos Duncker4.
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis, monitoring and treatment decisions in patients with chronic liver disease currently rely on biopsy as the diagnostic gold standard, and this has constrained early detection and management of diseases that are both varied and can be concurrent. Recent developments in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) suggest real potential to bridge the diagnostic gap between non-specific blood-based biomarkers and invasive and variable histological diagnosis. This has implications for the clinical care and treatment pathway in a number of chronic liver diseases, such as haemochromatosis, steatohepatitis and autoimmune or viral hepatitis. Here we review the relevant MRI techniques in clinical use and their limitations and describe recent potential applications in various liver diseases. We exemplify case studies that highlight how these techniques can improve clinical practice. These techniques could allow clinicians to increase their arsenals available to utilise on patients and direct appropriate treatments.Entities:
Keywords: Diffusion-weighted imaging; Elastography; Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; PDFF; T2*; cT1
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32761254 PMCID: PMC7593302 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02684-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY)
Summary of characteristic features of commercially available MRI techniques used in clinical practice for chronic liver disease
| Technology characteristic | R2 (FerriScan®) | cT1-T2*-PDFF (Liver | MRE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turnaround time | 2-day service | 1 h service | Point of care |
| Required hardware | 1.5T MRI scanner | MRI scanner, multiple field strengths and manufacturers | MRI scanner and driver device to generate mechanical waves |
| Regulatory clearance | CE; TGA; FDA(510 k) and as Companion Diagnostic Device | FDA (510 k); CE; TGA; SMDR; NZ: listed on MEDSAFE | FDA (510 K) for 2-D MRE only |
| Standardisation of hardware (CoV) | Manufacturer-based biases reported for R2 and R2* [ | For cT1 3.3% (Siemens, Philips) [ For T2* 6.6% (Siemens, Philips) [ For PDFF 0.8% (Siemens, Philips) [ | 10.7% (Philips, GE) [ |
| Diagnosis of iron overload | High sensitivity (0.85–0.94) and specificity (0.92–1.00) for wide range of liver iron concentrations [ | T2* AUROC for stainable iron: 0.79–0.94 [ | No, a confounder that can be overcome by T2* or SE-EPI sequences [ |
| Diagnosis of NASH and disease activity | Not applicable | cT1 AUROC for NASH: 0.69–0.72 [ cT1 AUROC for NAFLD: 0.93 [ cT1 AUROC for ballooning: 0.84 [adapted from [ cT1 AUROC for NAS ≥ 5: 0.74 [ | AUROC for NASH: 0.58 [ |
| Diagnosis of steatosis | Volumetric fat fraction of liver tissue (% fat) rather than PDFF available as HepaFatScan | PDFF AUROC for steatosis grades: ≥ G1: 0.93 [ ≥ G2: 0.96 [ ≥ G3: 0.94 [ | Not applicable but can add PDFF [ |
| Diagnosis of fibrosis | Not applicable but can combine with T1 or DWI or MRE [ | cT1 AUROC for fibrosis stages: ≥ F2: 0.63–0.79 [ ≥ F3: 0.62–0.74 [ F4: 0.72–0.85 [ | AUROC for fibrosis stages: ≥ F2: 0.83 2D-MRE [ ≥ F3: 0.96 2D-MRE [ F4: 0.91 [ |
| Diagnosis of high risk | No | AUROC for NASH or fibrosis ≥ F2: 0.83 [ | |
| Coverage of liver | Whole slice analysis over 11 slices based on ROI | Whole slice analysis over 1–4 slices based on ROI or segmentation | Whole slice analysis over 4 slices based on ROI |
| Measurement failure rate | Not reported | 1.4–5.6% [ | 4.3% [ |
| Repeatability (CoV) | 15–21% [ | For cT1 1.7–3.3% [ For T2*2.6- 5.5% [ For PDFF 0.8–8.8% [ | 11.0% [ |
| Confounded by iron | Not applicable | No, cT1 corrected for iron [ | Yes, requires separate quantification of iron [ |
| Confounded by fat | Yes, PDFF can influence R2* at both 1.5T and 3T [ | Yes, for cT1 but can be managed by altering sequence parameters [ | Yes, in paediatric populations [ |
| Confounded by comorbidities | Yes, fibrosis [ | Yes, inflammation and fibrosis both increase cT1 [ | Yes, by inflammation, passive congestion and large ascites [ |
Fig. 1Example mpMRI case showing reduction in cT1 and PDFF values following bariatric surgery
Fig. 2Example mpMRI cases of cT1 and PDFF in normal, overweight and obese paediatric cases
Fig. 3Example mpMRI case showing reduction in cT1 following sustained viral response (SVR) to 24-weeks of antiviral treatment for Hepatitis C
Fig. 4Example mpMRI case showing improvement in cT1 IQR following treatment in patient with concurrent AIH and primary sclerosing cholangitis
Fig. 5Scatterplot showing the distribution of cT1 and PDFF across paediatric disease groups and healthy controls, showing AIH patients on treatment, treatment naive AIH, Wilson’s disease (WD), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and NAFLD