Literature DB >> 34554595

Spectroscopy-based multi-parametric quantification in subjects with liver iron overload at 1.5T and 3T.

Gregory Simchick1, Ruiyang Zhao1,2, Gavin Hamilton3, Scott B Reeder1,2,4,5,6, Diego Hernando1,2,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the precision profile (repeatability and reproducibility) of quantitative STEAM-MRS and to determine the relationships between multiple MR biomarkers of chronic liver disease in subjects with iron overload at both 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3T.
METHODS: MRS data were acquired in patients with known or suspected liver iron overload. Two STEAM-MRS sequences (multi-TE and multi-TE-TR) were acquired at both 1.5T and 3T (same day), including test-retest acquisition. Each acquisition enabled estimation of R1, R2, and FWHM (each separately for water and fat); and proton density fat fraction. The test-retest repeatability and reproducibility across acquisition modes (multi-TE vs. multi-TE-TR) of the estimates were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients, linear regression, and Bland-Altman analyses. Multi-parametric relationships between parameters at each field strength, across field strengths, and with liver iron concentration were also evaluated using linear and nonlinear regression.
RESULTS: Fifty-six (n = 56) subjects (10 to 73 years, 37 males/19 females) were successfully recruited. Both STEAM-MRS sequences demonstrated good-to-excellent precision (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.81) for the quantification of R1water , R2water , FWHMwater , and proton density fat fraction at both 1.5T and 3T. Additionally, several moderate (R2 = 0.50 to 0.69) to high (R2 ≥ 0.70) correlations were observed between biomarkers, across field strengths, and with liver iron concentration.
CONCLUSIONS: Over a broad range of liver iron concentration, STEAM-MRS enables rapid and precise measurement of multiple biomarkers of chronic liver disease. By evaluating the multi-parametric relationships between biomarkers, this work may advance the comprehensive MRS-based assessment of chronic liver disease and may help establish biomarkers of chronic liver disease.
© 2021 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRS; chronic liver disease; iron overload; liver; liver iron concentration; quantitative

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34554595      PMCID: PMC8858702          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  53 in total

1.  Quantitative chemical shift-encoded MRI is an accurate method to quantify hepatic steatosis.

Authors:  Jens-Peter Kühn; Diego Hernando; Birger Mensel; Paul C Krüger; Till Ittermann; Julia Mayerle; Norbert Hosten; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  The relationship between myocardial and hepatic T2 and T2* at 1.5T and 3T MRI in normal and iron-overloaded patients.

Authors:  Supika Kritsaneepaiboon; Natee Ina; Thirachit Chotsampancharoen; Supaporn Roymanee; Sirichai Cheewatanakornkul
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 1.990

3.  A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.

Authors:  Terry K Koo; Mae Y Li
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-03-31

4.  A comparison of liver fat content as determined by magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction and MRS versus liver histology in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Ilkay S Idilman; Onur Keskin; Azim Celik; Berna Savas; Atilla Halil Elhan; Ramazan Idilman; Musturay Karcaaltincaba
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 1.990

5.  Hepatic R2* is more strongly associated with proton density fat fraction than histologic liver iron scores in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Mustafa R Bashir; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony C Gamst; Kathryn J Fowler; Michael Ohliger; Shetal N Shah; Adina Alazraki; Andrew T Trout; Cynthia Behling; Daniela S Allende; Rohit Loomba; Arun Sanyal; Jeffrey Schwimmer; Joel E Lavine; Wei Shen; James Tonascia; Mark L Van Natta; Adrija Mamidipalli; Jonathan Hooker; Kris V Kowdley; Michael S Middleton; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10-14       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Comparison of liver T1 relaxation times without and with iron correction in pediatric autoimmune liver disease.

Authors:  Jonathan R Dillman; Suraj D Serai; Alexander G Miethke; Ruchi Singh; Jean A Tkach; Andrew T Trout
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2020-05-14

7.  Gender-related variations in iron metabolism and liver diseases.

Authors:  Duygu D Harrison-Findik
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2010-08-27

8.  In vivo breath-hold (1) H MRS simultaneous estimation of liver proton density fat fraction, and T1 and T2 of water and fat, with a multi-TR, multi-TE sequence.

Authors:  Gavin Hamilton; Michael S Middleton; Jonathan C Hooker; William M Haufe; Nketi I Forbang; Matthew A Allison; Rohit Loomba; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Patient preference and willingness to pay for transient elastography versus liver biopsy: A perspective from British Columbia.

Authors:  Victoria Yui-Min Kan; Vladimir Marquez Azalgara; Jo-Ann E Ford; W C Peter Kwan; Siegfried Roland Erb; Eric M Yoshida
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-03

10.  T2 Relaxation Time Obtained from Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Liver Is a Useful Parameter for Use in the Construction of a Murine Model of Iron Overload.

Authors:  Yukari Matsuo-Tezuka; Yusuke Sasaki; Toshiki Iwai; Mitsue Kurasawa; Keigo Yorozu; Yoshihito Tashiro; Michinori Hirata
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-09-22       Impact factor: 3.161

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.