Division of the genus Chryseobacterium: Observation of discontinuities in amino acid identity values, a possible consequence of major extinction events, guides transfer of nine species to the genus Epilithonimonas, eleven species to the genus Kaistella, and three species to the genus Halpernia gen. nov., with description of Kaistella daneshvariae sp. nov. and Epilithonimonas vandammei sp. nov. derived from clinical specimens.

The genus Chryseobacterium in the family Weeksellaceae is known to be polyphyletic. Amino acid identity (AAI) values were calculated from whole-genome sequences of species of the genus Chryseobacterium, and their distribution was found to be multi-modal. These naturally-occurring non-continuities were leveraged to standardise genus assignment of these species. We speculate that this multi-modal distribution is a consequence of loss of biodiversity during major extinction events, leading to the concept that a bacterial genus corresponds to a set of species that diversified since the Permian extinction. Transfer of nine species (Chryseobacterium arachidiradicis, Chryseobacterium bovis, Chryseobacterium caeni, Chryseobacterium hispanicum, Chryseobacterium hominis, Chryseobacterium hungaricum,, Chryseobacterium pallidum and Chryseobacterium zeae) to the genus Epilithonimonas and eleven (Chryseobacterium anthropi, Chryseobacterium antarcticum, Chryseobacterium carnis, Chryseobacterium chaponense, Chryseobacterium haifense, Chryseobacterium jeonii, Chryseobacterium montanum, Chryseobacterium palustre, Chryseobacterium solincola, Chryseobacterium treverense and Chryseobacterium yonginense) to the genus Kaistella is proposed. Two novel species are described: Kaistella daneshvariae sp. nov. and Epilithonimonas vandammei sp. nov. Evidence is presented to support the assignment of Planobacterium taklimakanense to a genus apart from Chryseobacterium, to which Planobacterium salipaludis comb nov. also belongs. The novel genus Halpernia is proposed, to contain the type species Halpernia frigidisoli comb. nov., along with Halpernia humi comb. nov., and Halpernia marina comb. nov.

The history of the genus is complicated by multiple instances in which species from other genera have been transferred into or removed from the genus. The genus was proposed in 1994 to contain many of the species that were at that time considered to be members of the genus but were dissimilar both phenotypically and genetically to (type and only strain: ATCC 11947T), which is the type species of the genus [1]. In the same report, the genus was created to contain the generically misclassified species [2] and the genus was revived to accommodate the species , which had been given a variety of names over the years, including ‘Empedobacter breve’ [3, 4]. A decade later, the genus was created with a single species, , to accommodate three strains with 16S rRNA sequences quite distant from the type strains of the species of the genus that had been published at that time [5]. The next year (2005) the genus was created based on both 16S rRNA gene sequence and phenotypic differences to accommodate the species previously described as (reclassified as ), as well as the previously unnamed species [6]. The genus was created for and [7], and was added shortly thereafter [8]. The members of the genus were later recognised as having a 16S rRNA gene sequence similar to those of and and were transferred to the genus [9] in the same year that the single species in the genus () was reclassified as a member of the genus [10]. The genus was created with the description of [11], which was later proposed to belong to the genus on the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity [12]. The genus was created to accommodate the species [13], and by 2015 the genus had grown to contain four more species [14-17]. The species of the genus were subsequently transferred to the genus [18], despite the recognition that this would cause the genus to contain three separate lineages. This was considered to be the more conservative reclassification approach as it would result in minimal changes.

There are several genera the members of which are phenotypically similar to members of the genus but have historically been considered distinct. In 1986, the genus was created with a single species () to contain strains previously named as ‘CDC group IIf’ from human clinical specimens [19]. After the 1994 transfer of to the genus , it remained a single-species genus until 2015, when was described [20]. The genus was created to accommodate , named to honour O.V. Riemer, who in 1904 first described the disease septicemia anserum exsudativa in geese infected by [21]. A related bacterium causing respiratory infections in pigeons was later described as [22]. This species also causes illness in ostriches [23]. was found in apparently healthy pigeons [24]. The novel genus and species were created to accommodate clinical isolates that were similar phenotypically to members of the genera and [25], but it was later proposed that the single species in this genus be incorporated into the genus [26]. The genera [27], [28] and [29] were each established to contain a single species. The genus and all of these related genera had been previously described as belonging to the Chryseobacterium/Riemerella branch of the family but results from a whole genome sequence (WGS) analysis of 1000 type strain genomes from the phylum [30] recently indicated that they are distinct from the Flavobacteriaceae, and the family name was proposed for them.

WGS analysis has revolutionised the identification and taxonomic classification of bacterial isolates. High-coverage contigs from draft genome assemblies of short sequence reads (e.g., Illumina, with at least 50× coverage) have been shown to produce results indistinguishable from those produced using complete circularised genomes when values such as the average nucleotide identity using blast (ANIb) and genome-to-genome distance calculation (GGDC) formula 2 predicted DNA–DNA hybridization (DDH) are calculated [31-33]. Consequently, the WGS analyses described here are based on high-coverage draft genomes. The ANIb 95 % cut-off value for species delimitation [34] was calculated to be equivalent to a GGDC-predicted DDH value of slightly less than 65%, lower than the DDH value of approximately 70 % which has long been used for species delimitation [32]. This might support the 96.5 % whole-genome ANI (gANI) species threshold that has been suggested [35], or it might simply be an artefact of the inexactness of traditional DDH measurements. The use of WGS data in the naming of species is supplanting 16S rRNA sequence analysis [36], and some have argued for allowing the naming of a species based solely on WGS data, with the genome assembly itself serving as the type material [37].

A set of 182 isolates (primarily of clinical origin) belonging to, or resembling phenotypically, the members of the genera , and was previously analysed using DNA–DNA hybridization and comparative 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, resulting in the description of four novel species that each contained between two and six strains. The majority of the other isolates could be assigned to already-described species, but 15 strains each appeared distinct from all others and almost certainly represented novel species [12]. We refrained from proposing names for these, as per recommendations that multiple strains be used in describing a species [38]. The current study continues that previous work with a comprehensive whole-genome sequence analysis of those isolates. Over the course of this collaboration we have added 19 complete type strain genomes to the 85 genomes attributed to the type strains of species of the genus that were previously available and 20 additional genomes, some of which are the sole representative of yet-unnamed species. In the process we compared these to other species from the genus and its nearest neighbours, specifically those which were characterised in the Bergey’s chapter on and related genera [39] and came to the conclusion that a taxonomic realignment was necessary. Distribution of AAI values calculated from type strain comparisons was found to be multimodal, which led us to propose a re-organization based on average amino acid identity (AAI) that separates the genus into four different genera. These correspond to the multiple lineages apparent in previous publications [18] and also recognised as separate genera in the Genome Taxonomy Database [40]. This aligns genus assignments so that the type strain for each species in each genus has ≥76 % AAI values compared with the type strain of the type species of its genus.

Twenty-eight strains whose genome sequence has not previously been reported are listed in Table 1. This includes the type strains of , Chryseobacterium carnis, Chryseobacterium bernardetii and that had been described in the earlier study [12], along with one or two additional strains from the same DNA–DNA hybridization group. Of the DNA–DNA hybridization groups that were assigned in that paper to existing species (based on 16S rRNA gene sequence), a representative strain was selected for sequencing. Additional strains that might be taxonomically informative were identified by reviewing records of 16S rRNA gene sequences from isolates in the Special Bacteriology Reference Laboratory (SBRL) strain collection. Several members of the DNA–DNA hybridization group that we believed to be , additional representatives of several species of the genus that were well-represented in the collection, and strains of several suspected novel species were selected for sequencing. These 28 genomes were compared with genomes available in the public domain, including genomes from the type strains of all species that were considered to belong to the genus (n=76), genomes of selected strains considered to be members of the genus and representative of their respective species, but not type strains (n=4), and genomes of the type strains of species from the ‘nearest neighbour’ genera discussed in the introduction (n=20) (Table S1, available in the online version of this article). There remain more than 30 species of the genus with validly published names that have no type strain genome sequenced.

Table 1.

Details on newly sequenced strains

tDDH, traditional DNA–DNA hybridization; nd, not determined.

Strain number sequenced	Other strain numbers	Previously described as:	Proposed as:	Geographic location	Source	Date isolated	tDDH group	DDH_#	Accession Number
G0081	CL88/78; Hayes B19/1	Chryseobacterium carnis	Kaistella carnis	Unknown	Beef	1973	95	95	CP034159
F5649	CCUG 73498, CIP 111693	Chryseobacterium hominis	Epilithonimonas vandammei	Iowa, USA	Testicle	1984	224	224	CP034161
H6466	CCUG 73281	Chryseobacterium hominis	Epilithonimonas vandammei	Indianapolis, Indiana, USA	Leg wound	July, 2013	nd		CP034160
H3001	CCUG 73276; CIP 111694	Unidentified	Kaistella daneshvariae	New York, USA	Peritoneal cavity	January, 2004	nd		CP034158
F9257	CL712/92	Chryseobacterium taklimakanense	Planobacterium taklimakanense	Florida, USA	Blood	1987	212	212	CP034173
H4753	CCUG 73278	Chryseobacterium taklimakanense	Planobacterium taklimakanense	Michigan, USA	Blood	2008	nd		CP034171–CP034172
H5297	NCTC 13453; CCUG 52711; CIP 109415; DSM 22165; NF802	Chryseobacterium hominis	Epilithonimonas hominis	La Louvière, Belgium	Blood	1998	nd		RJTU00000000
G0240	CL278/82; CCUG 73500	‘123 group’	Chryseobacterium sp. nov.	Darlington, England	Urine	1982		153	RJTV00000000
G0235	CL542/79; CCUG 73274	‘71 group’	Chryseobacterium cucumeris	London, England	Green lizard	1979	71	148	RJTW00000000
H4373	KC_2159; CPW406; KCTC 12088; NBRC 102008; DSM 15235	Chryseobacterium daecheongense	Chryseobacterium daecheongense	Lake Daecheong, Korea	Freshwater lake sediment		nd		RJTX00000000
F4391	CL720/92	Chryseobacterium anthropi	Kaistella haifensis	Indiana, USA	Lung	1983		236	RJTY00000000
H3056	CCUG 73499	Unidentified	Kaistella daneshvariae	New Mexico, USA	Blood	2004	nd		RJUG00000000
G0079	CL311/80; A16/80; CCUG 73267	Chryseobacterium anthropi	Kaistella haifensis	Midlothian, Scotland	Calf	1980	93	93	CP033933
G0229	CL318/82	Chryseobacterium bernardetii	Chryseobacterium bernardetii	Doncaster, England	Sputum	1982	142	142	CP033932
G0211	CL97/78; Hayes S10/1; CCUG 73273	Chryseobacterium indoltheticum	Chryseobacterium indoltheticum	Unknown	Soil	Unknown	C. indoltheticum	140	CP033928
G0197	A139/68; CCUG 73271	Chryseobacterium lactis	Chryseobacterium lactis	Paisley, Scotland	Milk bottle rinse	Unknown	63	128	CP033925
KC_1864	NCTC 11390, A140/68, F68	Chryseobacterium lactis	Chryseobacterium lactis	Paisley, Scotland	Milk bottle rinse,	Unknown	63	63	CP033924
G0041	F91	Chryseobacterium nakagawai	Chryseobacterium nakagawai	Gloucester, England	Kidney abscess	Late 1960's	78	78	CP033923
G0162	CL192/74; CCUG 73268	‘78 group’	Chryseobacterium sp. nov.	Newcastle-upon-Tyne, England	Urine	1974	78	117	CP033922
F9942	A103/68; CCUG 73266	‘125 group’	Chryseobacterium carnipullorum	Paisley, Scotland	Milk swab	Unknown	125	64	CP033921
G0188	A104/68; CCUG 73270	‘125 group’	Chryseobacterium carnipullorum	Paisley, Scotland	Milk swab	Unknown	125	125	CP033920
G0186	A86/68; CCUG 73269	‘123 group’	Chryseobacterium sp. nov.	London, England	Human	Unknown	123	123	CP033918–CP033919
G0201	CL381/78	‘132 group’	Chryseobacterium sp. nov.	Dublin, Irish Republic	Drinking water	1978	132	132	CP033917
G0207	CL189/78; CCUG 73272	‘132 group’	Chryseobacterium shandongense	Nuneaton, England	Zimmer water bag	1978	132	136	CP033915–CP033916
G0239	CL141/82; CCUG 73275	‘132 group’	Chryseobacterium shandongense	London, England	Cryoprecipitate, transfusion reaction	1982	nd	152	CP033914
H4638	CCUG 73277	Chryseobacterium bernardetii	Chryseobacterium bernardetii	Pennsylvania, USA	Larynx	2008	nd		CP033931
H5559	CCUG 73280	Chryseobacterium indologenes	Chryseobacterium indologenes	Wailuku, Hawaii, USA	Blood	2010	nd		CP033930
H5143	CCUG 73279	‘132 group’	Chryseobacterium shandongense	Tennessee, USA	Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)	2009	nd		CP033912–CP033913

sp. nov.

sp. nov.

sp. nov.

DNA–DNA hybridization was performed as described previously [41]. All strains were biochemically characterised in all or most of a range of 68 conventional biochemical tests by methods described previously [42] and whole-genome sequences were generated as described previously [32, 43–47].

Sequence alignments were performed using the ClustalW module in BioEdit v7.0.5.3 [48]. For analysis of 16S rRNA genes, sequences were trimmed to match the start and end of the near full-length sequence JX100817 (deposited as strain G0081T). All pairwise comparisons with a 16S rRNA gene sequence identity greater than >98.65 % were considered as potentially representing the same species, as this limit has been recommended for species demarcation [49]. The rpoB gene sequences were extracted from WGS data as described previously [32]. Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using MEGAX [50] with the Jukes-Cantor substitution model.

Proteomes from each genome were generated by Prodigal v2.6.2 [51]. For each pairwise comparison, an all-versus-all search of all proteins was carried out using BLASTp v2.4.0+ [52] in both directions. If both directions of BLASTp searches resulted in the same protein match (pair) and exceeded 40 % in amino acid identity and 50 % in coverage length, we included the protein sequences for computing the arithmetic mean amino acid sequence identity (AAI). Percentage of conserved proteins (POCP) scores were calculated as previously described [53]. GGDC formula 2 was used to generate the predicted DDH values. The Jspecies software package version 1.2.1 was used to calculate average nucleotide identity with BLASTn alignments (ANIb) [31, 34]. Additional data visualizations were produced using JMP v11 (SAS Institute).

The gene pairings identified during the AAI pairwise comparisons described above were used to generate a list of 488 loci present in a single copy in all of the strains listed in Table S1. The maximum sequence length for each orthologous group was computed, and groups with members having a length ≥90 % of this maximum were selected for alignment. These 148 were aligned (as protein sequences) using ClustalW in BioEdit v7.0.5.3 [48], and manual refinements were made to align start and stop codons. Unusually divergent (<25 % nucleotide identity) loci were filtered out, and the remaining 119 gene sequences from each genome were concatenated. The most highly conserved of these loci were selected using a criterion that they had to have at least 25 % identity at the nucleic acid level. Gaps and invariant positions were masked, which left 68,272 core variable nucleotide sites. Maximum-likelihood analysis using the Jukes-Cantor substitution model was performed in RAxML ver 8.2.12 [54]. The best scoring topology of 250 maximum-likelihood trees had 100 bootstrap replicates overlaid. The extended majority-rule consensus indicated convergence (1.54 % weighted Robinson–Foulds mean) after 100 replicates [55].

Historically, there have been no unambiguous criteria for creation of a novel genus, and mis-classification of species has occurred frequently. The addition of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis to the phenotypic characterization of strains, which was originally used for taxonomic classification, represented a marked improvement but for several reasons is not ideal. Firstly, 16S rRNA gene sequences can differ at their various loci within a strain’s genome. This has been observed in the genus [32] as well as the genera [56], [57] and Neiserria [58]. Secondly, while a 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity below 98.5 % can ensure that two organisms will have less than 70 % DDH and therefore be separate species [59], the converse is not true. Organisms may have 16S rRNA gene sequences over 99 % similar or even identical and still belong to different species, with DDH values below 70 % and ANI values less than 95 %. For example, the type strains of [60] and [61] share 99.3 % identity in their 16S rRNA gene sequences, which could indicate they belong to the same species, but genome comparisons suggest otherwise (DNA–DNA hybridization <44 % [62, 63] and ANIb <91 %). The 16S rRNA gene sequences of are also very similar to those of and (98.9 and 98.8% identical, respectively), but the ANIb values from genome comparisons (averaging <87 and<82 %, respectively) confirm that all are separate species.

There are several species that have been included in the genus on the basis of the results of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis whose inclusion is not supported by the additional evidence of whole-genome sequence and/or reconstruction of a phylogenetic tree containing sequences from all of the closely related species. The proposal to include within the genus was made based on a 16S rRNA phylogenetic tree [12], and consequently the species was included in the genus in large part due to its similarity with [64], but an analysis that included all of the species of the genus and additional species of the family (Fig. S1), indicates it is more closely related to the members of the genus . The 16S rRNA gene sequence for the effectively but not yet validly published species ‘Chryseobacterium chengduensis’ is consistent with it being outside the genus (possibly in the genus ) when all of the closely related species are included. The assignment of this species to the genus was made based on an incomplete analysis that lacked an outgroup and included only 18 species of the genus , including several that we classify as belonging to the genus [65]. The species was described as a member of the genus based on a neighbour-joining tree that used the distantly related species as the outgroup. Our more extensive neighbour-joining tree (Fig. S1) located the 16S rRNA gene sequence of near to the base of the tree. To include it as a member of the genus would require the undesirable inclusion of other well-established genera, such as and Cloacibacterium, into the genus also. It is clear that genus assignment based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing has serious limitations, and that an objective and reproducible method for genus determination is needed.

Initially, a proposed method for genus delineation based on Percentage of Conserved Proteins (POCP) [53] was investigated for its utility in distinguishing species belonging to the genus and related genera. Calculation of AAI values based on the specified parameters was an intermediate step in generating the protein comparisons for POCP, but we found AAI values themselves to be more informative than POCP. This was fortunate, as the use of AAI values for genus determination has inherent advantages over POCP, particularly for incomplete genomes. Reciprocal AAI values are limited to the range of 0 to 100 regardless of protein quantities in each genome and are symmetric, so completeness of the genome will have less of an effect on this metric.

When AAI was calculated for type strain comparisons between species of the genus and species from related genera using the parameters specified for POCP, all AAI values were >65 %, and the distribution was bi-modal (Fig. 1). Out of 8646 AAI comparisons, only 44 (0.5 %) were between 74 and 76 %. This suggested a natural cut-off value between 74 and 76 %. Comparisons using complete genomes produced the same AAI results as when draft genomes were used (data not shown), which was expected for genomes that meet or exceed the minimum standards [66]. Most comparisons between strains that had an AAI of ≥76 % were categorised as representing members of the same genus, while most that had an AAI≤74 % represented members of different genera. Of the strain comparisons that deviated from this general rule, many contained strains that had been originally categorised as belonging to one of the genera that were later subsumed into the genus . We have formulated a strategy of genus delineation based on the criterion that the type strain of a species must have an AAI value greater than 76 % when compared with the type strain of the type species of its genus in order to represent a member of the same genus, and that all type strains must have an AAI value greater than 74 % when compared with each other. Exact AAI values calculated are parameter-dependant, so any application of this 74–76 % cut-off for genus delineation must use AAI values calculated with the parameters of 40 % amino acid identity and 50 % coverage length. The discontinuities of AAI distributions used to realign the polyphyletic genus were thus used in a manner similar to taxonomic redistributions of the genera [67] and [68].

Fig. 1.

Distribution of (A) AAI% and (B) POCP, for type strain comparisons where both strains are listed in LSPN as members of the genus (which includes the strains described in this paper as members of the genera , Halpernia, or ), or one of its closest relatives (, , , , or ). Dark grey indicates comparisons between strains already considered to belong to different genera. Note that few comparisons yield an AAI between 74 and 76 %, and that unlike POCP distribution, AAI distribution is bi-modal.

Just like the distribution of AAI values, the distribution of ANI values is discontinuous [69]. A dearth of ANI values in the low 70 % s among Enterococci [70] was attributed to the Permian extinction approximately 252 million years ago (MYA) which is believed to have eliminated 90–95 % of all species on the planet [71, 72]. The Permian was the third of five recognised major extinction events in the history of our planet [73-76]. A major extinction is characterised by a loss of biodiversity, followed by a re-diversification of the survivors [77]. This process pertains not only to multi-cellular fossil-forming organisms, but also to organisms for which there is no good fossil record, as evidenced by studies of microbialites [78] and of lichen-forming fungi [79]. In order to assess whether the observed AAI gap between 74 and 76% among members of the family would correspond to this gap in ANI values due to the Permian extinction, we charted AAI data for each strain comparison against average nucleotide identity blastn (ANIb) data for the same set of strains (data available on request), and found that a quadratic fit could be used to derive a formula that calculates the expected AAI from the ANIb (Fig. S2, part A). The gap in AAI values from 74 to 76 % does indeed correspond to an expected gap in ANIb values between 72.5 and 74 %, and examination of the distribution of ANIb scores shows a similar gap in this range (Fig. S2, part B).

We reasoned that if the gap in AAI values between 74 and 76 % represented the Permian extinction, then the second, less distinct valley in the distribution histogram that appears at an ANIb value of approximately 80 % might be an artefact of the Triassic extinction, which ended approximately 201 MYA [80]. Linear regression using these values, and a value of 100 % ANI for the present time, predicts that divergence of strains with the 95 % ANI that is used for species delineation [34] would have occurred approximately 65 MYA. This coincides with the timing of the Cretaceous–Paleogene (K-pg) extinction (notable for elimination of the non-avian dinosaurs [81-83]). If our calculations are correct that would mean that a bacterial species has a common ancestor which survived the K-pg extinction, and we could think of a genus as having a common ancestor that survived the Permian extinction (Fig. S3).

None of this actually proves our speculation that the multi-modal distribution of AAI (and ANIb) observed when large numbers of strain comparisons are examined is a consequence of extinction events. Regardless of their etiology, these naturally-occurring ‘gaps’ in distribution of AAI values can be utilised in a standardised taxonomic strategy [67].

In proposing to subdivide the genus , we contradict an earlier proposal [18] to merge these genera despite the evidence from whole-genome sequence data that doing so would result in a polyphyletic genus. The preference to reduce the number of taxonomic changes in the absence of a reliable method of genus delineation was reasonable at the time. Our strategy of genus delineation based on AAI values was developed based on the observation that strain comparisons yielding AAI values between these cut-off points are rare, and we suggest that this rarity is due to the likelihood that most of the bacterial cells whose descendants would have been separated by AAI values in this range were instead eliminated in the Permian extinction. Using this criterion places a number of species into the genera (including several originally classified as members of the genus ), Epilithonimonas or instead of the genus Chryseobacterium, and it reveals a previously unrecognised genus containing three of the species. The core genome analysis of these species, shown in Fig. 2, supports these divisions, and they can be readily distinguished by rpoB sequence analysis (Fig. S4).

Fig. 2.

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis of core genome loci from the members of the genus and closely related genera. The scale bar indicates substitutions per core variable site (n=68,272).

The newly-sequenced strains NCTC 13454T (), NCTC 10796T (), and NCTC 11390T () were confirmed as members of the genus based on AAI values of >76 % when compared with strain ATCC 35910T of Chryseobacterium gleum, the type species of the genus . In contrast, AAI values comparing the type strain of (the type species of the genus ) to other strains originally described as representing members of the genus were all >76 %, and those strains all have AAI values >76 % when compared with each other, but <74 % (range 71.34–71.97 %, mean=71.70 %) when compared with ATCC 35910T. Similarly, most strains that had originally been described as members of the genera or had AAI values >76 % (mean=80 %) when compared with each other or with the strain that was originally described as Kaistella koreensis, but <74 % (mean=72 %) when compared with ATCC 35910T.

The genus would thus comprise all its original species (, , and , and as the type species) with the addition of renamed as Epilithonimonas arachidiradicis comb. nov., Chryseobacterium bovis as Epilithonimonas bovis comb. nov., Chryseobacterium caeni as Epilithonimonas caeni comb. nov., Chryseobacterium hispanicum as Epilithonimonas hispanica comb. nov., Chryseobacterium hominis as Epilithonimonas hominis comb. nov., Chryseobacterium hungaricum as Epilithonimonas hungarica comb. nov., Chryseobacterium molle as Epilithonimonas mollis comb. nov., Chryseobacterium pallidum as Epilithonimonas pallida comb. nov. and as Epilithonimonas zeae comb. nov. The genus would consist of its original species () as the type species, and the species (formerly the type species of the genus ) would be named as Kaistella antarctica comb. nov., as Kaistella carnis comb. nov., as Kaistella chaponensis comb. nov., as Kaistella haifensis comb. nov., Chryseobacterium jeonii as Kaistella jeonii comb. nov., Chryseobacterium montanum as Kaistella montana comb. nov., Chryseobacterium palustre as Kaistella palustris comb. nov., Chryseobacterium solincola as Kaistella solincola comb. nov., Chryseobacterium treverense as Kaistella treverensis comb. nov., and as Kaistella yonginensis comb. nov. The effectively published Chryseobacterium senegalense, which has not yet been added to the validation lists, would also be placed into the genus .

Two species do not represent members of any of the genera proposed above, but instead have AAI values indicating that they comprise a separate novel genus. We propose to name this genus after Dr. Malka Halpern, Professor at University of Haifa in Israel. Consequently, the novel genus Halpernia contains renamed as the type species Halpernia frigidisoli comb. nov., and renamed as Halpernia humi comb. nov. On the basis of the results of 16S rRNA sequence analysis (Fig. S1), it appears that strain IMCC3228, originally designated as and later as Chryseobacterium marinum, also represents a member of this genus, so we propose to rename it as Halpernia marina comb. nov.

This study is an extension of DNA–DNA hybridization studies performed on NCTC and CDC strains which were originally named as belonging to CDC groups IIc, IIe, IIh and IIi [84]. While many of these strains had been described as representing novel species or assigned to already-described species [12], other DNA–DNA hybridization groups could not be assigned for various reasons. WGS analysis was applied to resolve these lingering questions.

Strain G0235 can be assigned to the species as its genome has an ANIb of 98.41 % when compared with the type strain of that species. It is the only one of the ‘71 group’ strains for which we have a sequenced genome, but the rpoB gene was sequenced for strains F9971 and F9973. The gene sequences for all three strains clustered with the rpoB sequence for the type strain of (see Fig. S4). The ‘71 group’ can therefore be considered to be .

G0079, the representative strain of the ‘93 group’, had been attributed to on the basis of its 16S rRNA gene sequence [12], but its whole-genome sequence revealed that it actually belongs to the species Kaistella haifensis based on ANIb similarity of 95.56 % with Kaistella haifensis strain DSM19056T. Kaistella haifensis can be included among the clinically relevant species, as many of the ‘93 group’ members were derived from human clinical specimens. There are currently no available sequence data for the type strain of Chryseobacterium anthropi, CCUG 52764, but we do have whole genome sequence data for our strain F4391 (=CCUG 15260) which was used in the species description for . Strain F4391 was also confirmed to be a strain of Kaistella haifensis by ANIb results of 96.14 %/96.18% and 95.68 %/95.50%, when compared with strains G0079 and DSM 19056T, respectively. was described as distinguishable from [85] by a lack of acid production from fructose, lactose and sucrose and by a negative ONPG test (β-galactosidase) [10], all of which were positive for DSM 19056T. All ‘93 group’ strains are negative for β-galactosidase, and for production of acid from lactose and sucrose; most, however, produce acid from fructose. Taken together, these findings cast doubt on whether is actually a separate species. As this question cannot be answered definitively without a genome sequence of the type strain of , we propose the name Kaistella anthropi to accommodate strain CCUG 52764.

Strains F9942 and G0188 belonged to the ‘125 group’, which was assigned to on the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity and a DDH value of 77 % at 55 °C [12]. 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis does not distinguish between and the later-named , but the paper describing found the two species to differ by a DDH value of 56.1 % [61]. The ANIb value of strains F9942 and G0188 when compared with each other was 99.98%, and when compared with the type strain of were 98.17 and 97.96 %, respectively. The ANIb values of any of these strains when compared with the type strain of were less than 91 %. Thus, members of the ‘125 group’ do not belong to Chryseobacterium shigense, instead they belong to the species . The two species are readily distinguished by rpoB gene sequence.

The results of our previous 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis indicated that strains G0201 and G0207 represented different species despite being both assigned to the ‘132 group’ in DNA–DNA hybridization studies. The 16S rRNA sequence of G0201 is most similar to that of , while the 16S rRNA sequences of strains G0207, G0239, and H5143 are most similar to that of , differing at a single nucleotide. Long-read (PacBio) sequencing was done on all four strains. ANIb comparisons using these assemblies confirms that strains G0207, G0239, and H5143 represent a single species, and differ from G0201 and any other species whose genome has been sequenced thus far, which would be expected as the type strain of has not yet been sequenced. There are phenotypic differences between the type strain of and the sequenced ‘132 group’ strains G0207, G0239, and H5143; the latter all grow on MacConkey agar, and none are mucoid. The species description [86] is emended to include the phenotypes of strains from our ‘132 group’.

The ‘224 group’, represented by strain F5649, was previously attributed to on the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis and DNA–DNA hybridization data [12]. Further confirmation of this species assignment was sought by sequencing the original strain F5649, and a modern isolate (H6466) that had been reported by our lab as . Strains F5649 and H5466 represented the same species, as expected. Their genomes were compared with strains NCTC 13453T and DSM 19326. The latter was the type strain of ‘’, a validly published species later determined by 16S rRNA sequence analysis, DNA–DNA hybridization, and phenotypic similarity to represent a member of [87, 88]. NCTC 13453T has an ANIb >95 % when compared with DSM 19326, providing confirmation that ‘Chryseobacterium arothri’ is indeed a junior synonym for , but both strains had an ANIb <94 % when compared with ‘224 group’ strains. The rpoB gene sequence was not useful in distinguishing among the four strains, as the rpoB sequence of Epilithonimonas hominis NCTC 13453T was 96.5 % identical with that of the other Epilithonimonas hominis strain (DSM 19326), but comparisons between Epilithonimonas hominis strains and '224 group' strains ranged from 95.4 to 98 %. The ‘224 group’ strains differed from in that they did not produce a DNase and did not produce acid from salicin. Characteristics that were consistently positive or negative are listed in the species description, but there was considerable variability among the strains. Most strains gave positive results (those giving negative results are given in parentheses) for acid production (in ammonium salt medium) from glycerol (CL263/70, CL205/78, CL213/83), casein digestion (CL205/78), gelatinase production (stab method: CL205/78, CL213/83; plate method: CL205/78), hydrolysis of starch (CL263/70, CL184/75, CL187/75, CL205/78), of Tween 20 (CL205/78) and of Tween 80 (CL263/70, CL195/76, CL205/78, CL373/79, CL213/83) and were oxidative according to the Hugh and Leifson O-F test (CL195/76).

Most strains gave negative results (those giving positive results are shown in parentheses) for acid production (in ammonium salt medium) from ethanol (CL309/73, CL184/75, CL187/75, CL205/78, CL445/80), fructose (CL263/70, CL195/76, CL373/79, CL445/80), mannitol (CL263/70), rhamnose (CL263/70) and sucrose (CL184/75, CL187/75, CL205/78, CL445/80), from glucose in peptone water medium (CL195/76, CL205/78) and from 10 % (w/v) glucose (CL445/80, CL213/83), growth on MacConkey agar (CL195/76, CL205/78, CL373/79), nitrate reduction (CL205/78, CL373/79, CL213/83), nitrite reduction (CL373/79, CL445/80), production of extracellular deoxyribonuclease (CL263/70, CL309/73, CL524/73, CL195/76) and of a brown melanin-like pigment on tyrosine agar (CL373/79).

On the basis of both its phenotypic differences from , and whole genome sequence results, the ‘224 group’ thus represents a novel species which we propose to name Epilithonimonas vandammei after Peter Vandamme, first author on the paper that originally described as a novel genus.

Strain G0162 was one of two strains originally assigned to the ‘78 group’ (the representative of this group was G0041, later designated as the type strain of ). The assignment of G0162 to the ‘78 group’ was marginal as its hybridization was only 69 % at 55 °C; its ANIb of 94 % compared with G0041 indicates that it does not represent a member of the same species. Its 16S rRNA sequence is most similar to that of the type strain of JM-534T, but ANIb comparisons between this strain’s genome and those of assemblies of two SRA data sets (SRX3054699 and SRX3054698) were in the range of 81–82 % (data not shown). Thus G0162 is currently the only known representative of its species. The description of is emended below to reflect removal of strain G0162 from the species.

Strain G0186 was the representative strain for the ‘123 group’, along with strain G0240 and was identified as on the basis of a 16S rRNA gene sequence identity of 99.2 % [12]. However, its ANIb compared with strain DSM 18017T was less than 83 % and it did not match any other species. Furthermore, strain G0240 was found to have an ANIb <86 % when compared with all other strains of members of the genus , including G0186. Hence, the ‘123 group’ is not a group at all, and each isolate is currently the sole representative of its species.

Two strains in the SBRL collection, H3001 and H3056, had identical 16S rRNA gene sequences that were also a close match with the 16S rRNA gene sequences from the type strains of Chryseobacterium treverensis (99.3%) and (99.0%), both of which are proposed herein to represent members of the genus . Their ANIb results of >96 % when compared with each other, but between 86.6 and 86.94% when compared with or Chryseobacterium solincola, indicate that they represent a novel species. We propose below the name Kaistella daneshvariae for this species, in recognition of Maryam Daneshvar. Dr. Daneshvar led the SBRL team during a phase of extraordinary productivity that culminated in the 1996 publication of the second edition of the Manual for Identification of Unusual Pathogenic Gram-Negative Aerobic and Facultatively Anaerobic Bacteria.

In 2013, we proposed to move the species into the genus , primarily on the basis of its 16S rRNA gene sequence [12]. On the basis of the WGS information now available, we consider our original proposal to have been premature. Since the 16S rRNA gene from JC490T clusters with the 16S rRNA gene sequences (Fig. S1)but has sequence identity <95 %, this species is probably a second species in the genus , for which we propose the name Planobacterium salipaludis comb. nov.

is a rare example of agenus assignment – we had to consider whether or not to classify it as a member of the genus . The AAI between NCTC 13490T and CCUG 49689T, the type strain of (the type species of the genus ) was intermediate at 75.1 %. The highest AAI that the type strain of Planobacterium taklimakanense, NCTC 13490T, shared with any other type strain was 76.25 % (Kaistella haifensis), and it had an AAI >76 % when compared to three of the type strains of species of the genus , but it also had an AAI < 74 % when compared with the type strains of nine other species of the genus . Several characteristics are shared among members of the proposed genus , such as small genome size, presence of a carotenoid biosynthetic gene cluster (accessions numbers SNV33133–33186) including lycopene cyclase (SNV33175), absence of the darA gene (Accession number EFK37140 in ) and a corresponding absence of the flexirubin pigments that its encoded protein would produce, and a fatty acid composition with >10 % C15 : 0 anteiso. However, unlike the strains belonging to the genus , lacks the nosZ gene (accession number KMQ71079 in ) and associated maturase genes necessary to produce nitrous oxide reductase. Core genome analysis placed the genus Halpernia between and . Taken together, these findings are sufficient evidence to consider as a separate genus. The SBRL at CDC receives several specimens of this species every year for identification, and it should be recognised as a potential human pathogen.

Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequences (Fig. S1) of all species described as members of the genus , along with most other members of the family and as the outgroup, places the recently published near the base of the tree, near the genus . The effectively, but not validly, published ‘Chryseobacterium chengduensis’ clusters with Daejongia ginsengosidivorans. Chryseobacterium frigidum appears to be most closely related to Cruicaptor ignavus, but divergent phenotypically, both in cell shape and in major fatty acid composition. No whole-genome sequences exist for any of these species, so out of an abundance of caution we make no proposals for them at this time. In contrast, the 16S RNA gene species is clustered with several fully sequenced strains of , and is phenotypically similar to them, providing sufficient evidence for our proposal of this species as Planobacterium salipaludis comb. nov. Similarly, both 16S rRNA gene sequence and phenotype of were similar to those of the proposed species of the genus Halpernia, prompting us to designate this species as Halpernia marina comb. nov. All species of the genus cluster together apart from any other genus, as do the species of the genera and Halpernia but there is some intermingling among the species of the genera and . In contrast, phylogenetic analysis of rpoB gene sequences (Fig. S3) provides a much clearer separation of the genera, and is in agreement with the core genome maximum likelihood analysis (Fig. 2) and with the genus assignments based on AAI.

Available phenotypic data from the literature for each of the 109 species listed as members of the genus in the LSPN as of September 2018, along with phenotypic data for two novel species described herein, has been tabulated (Table S2). Phenotypic differentiation of members of the family has long been recognised as difficult and unreliable, as variation within each species is substantial, and certain assays produce different results depending on the method used. For example, strains of members of the genus that were unable to grow on MacConkey agar when initially isolated gained the ability to do so after several passages [89]. Table S2 Despite these limitations, certain trends can be discerned and are discussed here. Because some data were not available, we describe the results as a fraction with the denominator representing the number of species in a particular genus that have data available.

Almost half of species of the genus tested (27 out of 66) degraded urea, but only one species of the genus did, and none of the species of the genera Halpernia or . Most species of the genera (73/75), Halpernia (2/2), and (11/11) degraded aesculin, but almost half (6/13) of the species of the genus did not. The only strains capable of growing on cetrimide agar were among the species of the genus , although only a minority of those (13 out of 31) were able to do so.

A few species of the genus (7/55) produced acid from mannitol while no species of the genera Halpernia (0/1), or (0/11) did, and only a single species of the genus (1/8) produced acid from mannitol, but results varied for different laboratories. No species of the genus Halpernia (0/1) and only a single species of the genus (1/11) produced acid from arabinose, but over 20 % of species of the genera (14/61) and (3/10) did. No species of the genus (0/11) produced acid from trehalose, but half or more of species of the genera (33/52), (5/9), and Halpernia (1/2) did.

A novel phospholipid fatty acid, anteiso-C17 : 2 ω3,7, has been recently identified in the cell membrane of the type strain of Halpernia frigidisoli [90]. The fact that this fatty acid is predominant when the bacterium is grown at 0°C indicates its importance for cell membrane adaptation. All species of the genus Halpernia grew at 5 °C, and none grew at 42 °C. Both of the available genomes of members of the genus Halpernia contain proteorhodopsin and beta-carotene monoxygenase, neither of which were present in any genome from a member of the genera Epilithonimonas, Chryseobacterium or .

Christensen et al. [38] recommended that multiple strains be used to describe a novel species, rather than a single individual strain, but publication of single-strain species descriptions continues. There have even been suggestions made that a single complete sequenced genome could be used as the type material for publication of a novel species, regardless of whether it can be cultured [37]. The advantage to this approach is that once a novel species is named, additional strains (particularly metagenome assembled genomes) can be assigned to it based on genome sequence similarity, thereby increasing the diversity of habitats known to be occupied by that particular species and improving our understanding of its biology. Unfortunately, single-strain species naming has led to a proliferation of species names, and there is a danger that if this trend continues, the list of validly published species names will become essentially a list of well-characterised named isolates. This could be avoided by limiting the naming of a species to those that have already been isolated more than once or encountered in more than one metagenomics sample. For these reasons, we have elected to release the genomes of several strains that are the sole known representative of their species, without naming them, in hopes of facilitating future collaborations.

Emended description of the genus Vandamme et al. 1994

The description of the genus is as stated by Vandamme et al. [1] and emended by Kämpfer et al. [10], Wu et al. [91], and Chen et al. [92], with the following emendments: All species tested produce non-diffusible flexirubin type pigments. Most species do not reduce nitrate or nitrite, and most are not capable of growth at 42 °C. Most do not produce H2S. Tween-80 and starch are usually degraded. Acid production is common from glucose, maltose, and trehalose, but rare from lactose or mannitol. The DNA G+C content ranges from 28.8 to 49.3 mol%.

The type species is Vandamme et al. (1994). Whole genome analysis of the type strain of each species produces AAI comparison values, using proteins that share 40 % amino acid identity and 50 % coverage length, of ≥76 % when compared with strain F93T, and ≥74 % when compared with the type strain of each of the other species in the family. Species that have already been named as members of the genus but have not yet their type stain’s genome sequenced at this time and are not otherwise discussed in this manuscript can be assumed to remain in the genus .

Emended description of Holmes et al. 2013

The description is as given by Holmes et al. [12] and Kim et al. [64] with the following emendments: Different strains give different results for H2S production (lead acetate paper method) and nitrate reduction. The DNA G+C content of type strain G0229T was calculated to be 36.3 mol%.

Emended description of Campbell and Williams 1951 Vandamme et al. 1994

The description is as given by Campbell and Williams [93] and discussed by Bernardet et al. [94] with the following emendment: The DNA G+C content was 34.3 mol% for both strains G0141T and G0211.

The description is as given by Holmes et al. [12] with the following emendment: The DNA G+C content of the type strain KC1864T was calculated to be 36.1 mol%.

The description is as given by Holmes et al. [12] with the following emendments: strains are positive for acid production (in ammonium salt medium) from glycerol, aesculin hydrolysis, growth on cetrimide agar, hydrolysis of Tween 80, and utilisation of citrate (Christensen’s medium). The DNA G+C content of the type strain, G0041T, was calculated to be 35.4 mol%.

Emended description of Yang et al. 2015

The description is as given by Yang et al. [86], with the following emendments: Acid is produced from glucose, ethanol and maltose but not from adonitol, dulcitol, glycerol, inositol, lactose, mannitol, raffinose, salicin, sorbitol or sucrose. Hydrolysis of starch, gelatin and DNA varies between strains, as does growth on MacConkey agar.

Emended description of the genus O'Sullivan et al. 2006

The description is as given by O'Sullivan et al. [13] but with the following emendments:

Colonies are circular, entire and convex and may be non-pigmented or yellow to bright orange. Cannot produce acid from mannitol. Does not reduce nitrite, hydrolyze urea or produce hydrogen sulphide or arginine dihydrolase but does degrade aesculin. Will not grow on cetrimide agar, and cannot tolerate 3 % NaCl. The DNA G+C content is between 33.3 and 39.2 mol%.

The type species is . Whole genome analysis of the type strain of each species produces AAI comparison values, using proteins that share 40 % amino acid identity and 50 % coverage length, of ≥76 % when compared with strain EP105T, and ≥74 % when compared with the type strain of each of the other species in the genus.

Description of Epilithonimonas arachidiradicis comb. nov.

Epilithonimonas arachidiradicis (a.ra.chi.di.ra′di.cis. N.L. fem. n. Arachis - idis the generic name of the peanut plant; L. fem. n. radix - icis root; N.L. gen. n. arachidiradicis of the root of Arachis).

Basonym: Kämpfer et al. 2015

The description is as given by Kämpfer et al. [95]. The type strain is 91A-612T = LMG 27814T = CCM 8490T= CIP 110647T.

Description of Epilithonimonas bovis comb. nov.

Epilithonimonas bovis (bo′vis. L. gen. n. bovis of a cow, referring to the isolation from raw cow's milk).

Basonym: Hantsis-Zacharov et al. 2008

The description is as given by Hantsis-Zacharov et al. [96]. The type strain is H9T=DSM 19482T=LMG 24227T.

Description of Epilithonimonas caeni comb. nov.

Epilithonimonas caeni (cae′ni. L. gen. n. caeni of sludge).

Basonym: Quan et al. 2007

The description is as given by Quan et al. [97] as emended by Hahnke et al. [18]. The type strain is N4T = CCBAU 10201T=DSM 17710T=KCTC 12506T.

Description of Epilithonimonas hispanica comb. nov.

Epilithonimonas hispanica (his.pa′ni.ca. L. fem. adj. hispanica from Spain).

Basonym: Gallego et al. 2006

The description is as given Gallego et al. [98]. The type strain is VP48T=CECT 7129T=CCM 7359T=JCM 13554T.

Description of Epilithonimonas hominis comb. nov.

Epilithonimonas hominis (ho′mi.nis. L. gen. n. hominis of a man, of a human being, named as such because most of the known isolates at the time of description were of human origin).

Basonym: Vaneechoutte et al. 2007

The description is as given by Vaneechoutte et al. [99]. The type strain is NF802T=CCUG 52711T=CIP 109415T.

Description of Epilithonimonas hungarica comb. nov.

Epilithonimonas hungarica (hun.ga′ri.ca. N.L. fem. adj. hungarica from Hungary, referring to the country from which the type strain was isolated).

Basonym: Szoboszlay et al. 2008

The description is as given by Szoboszlay et al. [100]. The type strain is CHB-20pT=NCAIM B2269T=DSM 19684T.

Description of Epilithonimonas mollis comb. nov.

Epilithonimonas mollis (mol′lis. L. fem. adj. mollis pliant, sensitive, referring to the sensitivity to antibiotics).

Basonym: Herzog et al. 2008.

The description is the same as given by Herzog et al. [101]. The type strain is DW3T=DSM 18016T=CCUG 52547T.

Description of Epilithonimonas pallida comb. nov.

Epilithonimonas pallida (pal′li.da. L. fem. adj. pallida pale).

Basonym: Herzog et al. 2008

The description is the same as given by Herzog et al. [101]. The type strain is 26-3St2bT=DSM 18015T=CCUG 52548T.

Description of Epilithonimonas zeae comb. nov.

Epilithonimonas zeae (ze′ae. L. gen. n. zeae, of spelt, of Zea mays).

Basonym: Kämpfer et al. 2014

The description is as given by Kämpfer et al. [102]. The type strain is JM-1085T=LMG 27809T=CCM 8491T.

Description of Epilithonimonas vandammei sp. nov.

Epilithonimonas vandammei (van.dam′me.i. N.L. gen. masc. n. vandammei named in honor of Peter Vandamme in recognition of his many contributions to the study of the genus and related genera).

Cells are Gram-stain-negative. Colonies are circular, convex, entire, opaque, shiny, smooth and usually yellow-pigmented. Positive for acid production (in ammonium salt medium) from glucose and maltose, aesculin hydrolysis, catalase production, cytochrome oxidase production, growth at 37 °C, at room temperature (18–22 °C) and on β-hydroxybutyrate. Negative for acid production (in ammonium salt medium) from adonitol, arabinose, cellobiose, dulcitol, inositol, lactose, raffinose, salicin, sorbitol, trehalose and xylose, arginine dihydrolase production, fluorescence on King’s B medium, gas production from glucose in peptone water medium, gluconate oxidation, growth at 5 °C and at 42 °C and on cetrimide agar, hydrolysis of tyrosine, H2S production (by both lead acetate paper and triple sugar iron agar methods), KCN tolerance, lecithinase production, lipid inclusions after growth on β-hydroxybutyrate, lysine decarboxylase production, malonate utilisation, motility (hanging drop preparation at both 37 °C and room temperature), ornithine decarboxylase production, phenylalanine deamination, production of β-galactosidase (ONPG test), reduction of 0.4 % (w/v) selenite, urease production, utilisation of citrate (Christensen’s and Simmons’ media) and 3-ketolactose production.

The type strain is F5649T=CCUG 73498T=CIP 111693T and was derived from a human clinical testicle isolate from Iowa, USA, in 1984. The DNA G+C content of the type strain has been calculated from its genome sequence to be 37 mol%.

Description of Halpernia gen. nov.

Halpernia (Hal.per′ni.a. N.L. fem. n. Halpernia named after Malka Halpern, Professor at University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel, in recognition of her many contributions to the study of the genus and related genera.)

Cells are aerobic. Colonies are yellow-pigmented. Capable of growth on 3 % NaCl. Grows at 5 and 25 °C. Starch is hydrolyzed. Does not degrade urea. Positive for acid production from cellobiose, glucose and lactose; weakly positive for acid production from salicin. Whole-genome analysis of the type strain of each species produces AAI comparison values, using proteins that share 40 % amino acid identity and 50 % coverage length, of ≥76 % when compared with Halpernia frigidisoli strain PB4T, and ≥74 % when compared with the type strain of each of the other species in the genus. The DNA G+C content is 33.7–34 mol%.

The type species is Halpernia frigidisoli.

Description of Halpernia frigidisoli comb. nov.

Halpernia frigidisoli (fri.gi.di.so′li. L. adj. frigidus cold, cool, chilled; L. neut. n. solum soil; N.L. gen. n. frigidisoli pertaining to cold soil, as the strain was isolated from a cold Antarctic soil).

Basonym: Bajerski et al. 2013

The description is as given by Bajerski et al. [103]. The type strain is PB4T=DSM 26000T=LMG 27025T.

Description of Halpernia humi comb. nov.

Halpernia humi (hu′mi. L. gen. n. humi of earth, soil).

Basonym: Pires et al. 2010

The description is as given by Pires et al. [104]. The type strain is ECP37T=LMG 24684T=NBRC 104927T.

Description of Halpernia marina comb. nov.

Halpernia marina (ma.ri′na. L. fem. adj. marina of the sea, marine).

Basonyms: Lee et al. 2007, Kämpfer et al. 2009

The description is as given by Lee et al. [8] and as emended by Kämpfer et al. [9] . The type strain is IMCC3228T (=KCCM 42689T=NBRC 103143T).

Emended description of the genus Kim et al. 2004

The description is as given by Kim et al. [5], but is emended as follows:

All strains grow at room temperature; Carotenoid pigments are usually produced. Colonies may be opaque, translucent or transparent. Catalase and oxidase are usually, but not always, positive, and arginine dihydrolase and β-galactosidase are usually, but not always, negative. Aesculin hydrolysis is present in some species. Nitrite is not reduced, and most species do not reduce nitrate. Does not grow on cetrimide agar. Acid production from mannitol, trehalose and xylose is negative, acid production from glucose varies between species. The DNA base composition ranges from 31.3 to 41.6 mol% G+C.

The type species is . Whole-genome analysis of the type strain of each species produces AAI comparison values, using proteins that share 40 % amino acid identity and 50 % coverage length, of ≥76 % when compared with strain Chj707 T, and ≥74 % when compared with the type strain of each of the other species in the genus.

Description of Kaistella anthropi comb. nov.

Kaistella anthropi (an′thro.pi. Gr. n. anthropos, a human being; N.L. gen. n. anthropi, of a human being, since all strains so far recovered are from human clinical specimens).

Basonym: Kämpfer et al. 2009

The description is as given by Kämpfer et al. [10]. The type strain is NF 1366T=CCUG 52764T=CIP 109762T.

Description of Kaistella antarctica comb. nov.

Kaistella antarctica (ant.arc′ti.ca. L. fem. adj. antarctica southern, named after Antarctica, the geographical origin of the type strain).

Basonyms: Yi et al. 2005, Kämpfer et al. 2009

The description is as given by Yi et al. [7] and emended by Kämpfer et al. [9] and Hahnke, et al. [18]. The type strain is AT1013T=IMSNU 14040T=KCTC 12225T=JCM 12381T.

Description of Kaistella carnis comb. nov.

Kaistella carnis (car′nis. L. fem. n. carnis, of flesh)

Basonym: Holmes et al. 2013

The description is as given by Holmes et al. [12], with the following emendment: The type strain is G0081T=NCTC 13525T=CCUG 60559T=CL88/78T=Hayes B19/1T. The DNA G+C content of type strain G0081 was calculated to be 36.4 mol%.

Description of Kaistella chaponensis comb. nov.

Kaistella chaponensis (cha.po.nen′sis. N.L. fem. adj. chaponensis pertaining to Lake Chapo, Chile, from which the Atlantic salmon harbouring the original two isolates was obtained)

Basonym: Kämpfer et al. 2011

The description is as given by Kämpfer et al. [105]. The type strain is Sa 1147–06T=DSM 23145T=CCM 7737T.

Description of Kaistella daneshvariae sp. nov.

Kaistella daneshvariae (da.nesh.va′ri.ae. N.L. gen. fem. n. daneshvariae named in honor of Maryam Daneshvar, for her many contributions to the description and characterization of strains from CDC’s collection of clinical bacterial isolates).

Cells are Gram-stain-negative, rod shaped, aerobic and non-motile. Colonies on blood agar with 5 % rabbit’s blood are yellow-pigmented, convex and smooth with no lysis and may appear mucoid or runny. Growth occurs at 25 and 35° but not at 42 °C. Does not require NaCl or tolerate high (6 %) NaCl. Does not grow on MacConkey’s, citrate or cetrimide agars. Catalase- and oxidase-positive, and positive for indole production. Does not hydrolyze urea, aesculin or gelatin, and does not reduce nitrate. Produces H2S on lead acetate paper but not triple sugar iron agar. Acid production may occur from glucose, but not from d-xylose, mannitol, lactose, sucrose or maltose.

The type strain is H3001T (=CCUG 73276T=CIP 111694T), which was isolated from the peritoneal cavity of a patient in the state of New York, USA. The DNA G+C content of the type strain is 39.9 %. A second reference strain is H3056 (=CCUG 73499), which was isolated as a blood culture from a patient in New Mexico, USA.

Description of Kaistella haifensis comb. nov.

Kaistella haifensis (hai.fen′sis. N.L. fem. adj. haifensis pertaining to Haifa, the name of the university (University of Haifa) where the first isolates were studied.)

Basonym: Hantsis-Zacharov and Halpern 2007

The description is the same as for [85]. The type strain is H38T=DSM 19056T=LMG 24029T.

Description of Kaistella jeonii comb. nov.

Kaistella jeonii (jeo′ni.i. N.L. gen. n. jeonii named in honour of the late Jae Gyu Jeon, who devoted his life to polar research.)

Basonyms: Yi et al. 2005, Kämpfer et al. 2009

The description is as given by Yi et al. [7] as emended by Kämpfer et al.[9] . The type strain is AT1047T=IMSNU 14049T=KCTC 12226T=JCM 12382T.

Description of Kaistella montana comb. nov.

Kaistella montana sp. nov. (mon.ta′na. L. fem. adj. montana living in the mountains).

Basonym: Guo et al. 2016

The description is as given by Guo et al. [106]. The type strain is WG4T=KCTC 52204T=CCTCC AB 2016058T.

Description of Kaistella palustris comb. nov.

Kaistella palustris (pa.lus′tris. L. fem. adj. palustris pertaining to a marsh)

Basonym: Pires et al. 2010

The description is as given by Pires et al. [104] as emended by Hahnke, et al. [18]. The type strain is 3A10T (=LMG 24685T=NBRC 104928T).

Description of Kaistella solincola comb. nov.

Kaistella solincola (sol.in′co.la. L. neut. n. solum soil; L. masc. or fem. n. incola an inhabitant; N.L. n. solincola an inhabitant of soil).

Basonym : Benmalek et al. 2010

The description is as given by Benmalek et al. [107] as emended by Hahnke, et al. [18]. The type strain is 1YB-R12T=DSM 22468T=CCUG 55604T.

Description of Kaistella treverensis comb. nov.

Kaistella treverensis (tre.ve.ren′sis. N.L. fem. adj. treverensis, pertaining to Augusta Trevirorum, the Latin name of Treves [Trier, West Germany], the city from which the strain was sent for identification).

Basonym: Yassin et al. 2010

The description is as given by Yassin et al. [108]. The type strain is IMMIB L-1519T=CCUG 57657T=DSM 22251T.

Description of Kaistella yonginensis comb. nov.

Kaistella yonginensis (yon.gi.nen′sis. N.L. fem. adj. yonginensis of or belonging to Yongin, Korea, from where the type strain was isolated).

Basonym: Joung and Joh, 2011

The description is as given by Joung and Joh [109]. The type strain is HMD1043T=KCTC 22744T=CECT 7547T.

Emended description of the genus Peng et al. 2009

The description is as given by Peng et al. [11].

The type species of the genus is Peng et al. (2009). Despite the naming of the genus based on motility of the first isolate, motility has not been observed in subsequent isolates. The predominant cellular fatty acids are iso-C15 : 0 and anteiso-C15 : 0. Whole-genome analysis of the type strain of each species produces AAI comparison values, using proteins that share 40 % amino acid identity and 50 % coverage length, of ≥76 % when compared with strain X-65T, and ≥74 % when compared with the type strain of each of the other species in the genus.

Emended description of Peng et al. 2009

The description is as given by Peng et al. [11] and Kim et al. [64] but with the following amendment: The DNA G+C content of strain NCTC 13490T is 40.4 mol% based on WGS, and reference strains H4753 and F9257 have DNA G+C contents of 40.8 mol% and 40.7 mol%, respectively.

Description of Planobacterium salipaludis comb. nov.

Planobacterium salipaludis (sa.li.pa.lu′dis. L. n. sal, salt; L. gen. n. paludis, of a swamp; N.L. gen. n. salipaludis, of a salt marsh)

Basonym: Divyasree et al. 2018

The description is as given by Divyasree et al. [110]. The type strain is JC490T (KCTC 52835T=LMG 30048T).

Click here for additional data file.

Click here for additional data file.

Click here for additional data file.