Literature DB >> 19622666

Description of Chryseobacterium anthropi sp. nov. to accommodate clinical isolates biochemically similar to Kaistella koreensis and Chryseobacterium haifense, proposal to reclassify Kaistella koreensis as Chryseobacterium koreense comb. nov. and emended description of the genus Chryseobacterium.

Peter Kämpfer1, Mario Vaneechoutte, Nicole Lodders, Thierry De Baere, Véronique Avesani, Michèle Janssens, Hans-Jürgen Busse, Georges Wauters.   

Abstract

A collection of eight strains, NF 1366(T), NF 450, NF 1101, NF 1107, NF 1123, NF 1413, CCUG 15260 and CCUG 15624, from various clinical origins, were characterized biochemically as similar to Kaistella koreensis and Chryseobacterium haifense. They differed from K. koreensis, which is unable to alkalinize acetate, and from C. haifense, which is ONPG-positive (beta-galactosidase) and acidifies sucrose, fructose and lactose. Based on 16S rRNA gene sequence comparisons, this collection of strains was most closely related to the type strains of K. koreensis (97.3-97.5 %) and C. haifense (99.1 %). Representative strain NF 1366(T) showed only 41.8 % DNA-DNA relatedness with K. koreensis DSM 12107(T) and only 51.9 % with C. haifense DSM 19056(T). DNA-DNA hybridization of strains NF 450 and CCUG 15624 to strain NF 1366(T) was 41.7 and 74.6 %, respectively, and relatedness of these strains with C. haifense DSM 19056(T) was 72.6 and 70.2 %. With the present information, these two strains must be classified as intermediate between C. haifense and strain NF 1366(T). The fatty acid composition and polar lipid profile of strain NF 1366(T) were similar to those reported for other Chryseobacterium species. Like other chryseobacteria, strain NF 1366(T) exhibited a polyamine pattern with the predominant compound sym-homospermidine and a quinone system consisting of menaquinone MK-6 only. For this collection of clinical strains, the name Chryseobacterium anthropi sp. nov. is proposed, with NF 1366(T) (=CCUG 52764(T) =CIP 109762(T)) as the type strain. K. koreensis was shown to be very similar genotypically and phenotypically to Chryseobacterium. Its polar lipid profile exhibited the major characteristics shown for recently described Chryseobacterium species and the fatty acid profile of K. koreensis was also very similar to those of the Chryseobacterium species. Hence, no striking genotypic or phenotypic differences could be found that could justify the classification of this species into a separate genus, and we therefore propose to reclassify Kaistella koreensis in the genus Chryseobacterium as Chryseobacterium koreense comb. nov. (type strain Chj707(T) =IAM 15050(T) =JCM 21512(T) =KCTC 12107(T) =NBRC 103027(T)). An emended description of the genus Chryseobacterium is also proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19622666     DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.008250-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol        ISSN: 1466-5026            Impact factor:   2.747


  10 in total

1.  Molecular identification of bacterial endosymbionts of Sappinia strains.

Authors:  Daniele Corsaro; Claudia Wylezich; Julia Walochnik; Danielle Venditti; Rolf Michel
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Chryseobacterium chengduensis sp. nov. isolated from the air of captive giant panda enclosures in Chengdu, China.

Authors:  Cai-Fang Wen; Li-Xin Xi; Shan Zhao; Zhong-Xiang Hao; Lu Luo; Hong Liao; Zhen-Rong Chen; Rong She; Guo-Quan Han; San-Jie Cao; Rui Wu; Qi-Gui Yan; Rong Hou
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  Analysis of 1,000 Type-Strain Genomes Improves Taxonomic Classification of Bacteroidetes.

Authors:  Marina García-López; Jan P Meier-Kolthoff; Brian J Tindall; Sabine Gronow; Tanja Woyke; Nikos C Kyrpides; Richard L Hahnke; Markus Göker
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Kaistella soli sp. nov., isolated from oil-contaminated experimental soil.

Authors:  Dhiraj Kumar Chaudhary; Ram Hari Dahal; Joung-Ho Park; Yongseok Hong
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 2.552

5.  Pathogenic Potential and Control of Chryseobacterium Species from Clinical, Fish, Food and Environmental Sources.

Authors:  Elebert Pauline Mwanza; Arno Hugo; George Charimba; Celia J Hugo
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-04-25

6.  Accurate identification of fastidious Gram-negative rods: integration of both conventional phenotypic methods and 16S rRNA gene analysis.

Authors:  Maria G de Melo Oliveira; Susanne Abels; Reinhard Zbinden; Guido V Bloemberg; Andrea Zbinden
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.605

7.  Genome-Based Taxonomic Classification of Bacteroidetes.

Authors:  Richard L Hahnke; Jan P Meier-Kolthoff; Marina García-López; Supratim Mukherjee; Marcel Huntemann; Natalia N Ivanova; Tanja Woyke; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Markus Göker
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 8.  Emerging flavobacterial infections in fish: A review.

Authors:  Thomas P Loch; Mohamed Faisal
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 10.479

9.  High-quality genome sequence and description of Chryseobacterium senegalense sp. nov.

Authors:  C I Lo; S A Sankar; O Mediannikov; C B Ehounoud; N Labas; N Faye; D Raoult; P-E Fournier; F Fenollar
Journal:  New Microbes New Infect       Date:  2016-01-22

10.  Division of the genus Chryseobacterium: Observation of discontinuities in amino acid identity values, a possible consequence of major extinction events, guides transfer of nine species to the genus Epilithonimonas, eleven species to the genus Kaistella, and three species to the genus Halpernia gen. nov., with description of Kaistella daneshvariae sp. nov. and Epilithonimonas vandammei sp. nov. derived from clinical specimens.

Authors:  Ainsley C Nicholson; Christopher A Gulvik; Anne M Whitney; Ben W Humrighouse; Melissa E Bell; Barry Holmes; Arnie G Steigerwalt; Aaron Villarma; Mili Sheth; Dhwani Batra; Lori A Rowe; Mark Burroughs; Jessica C Pryor; Jean-François Bernardet; Celia Hugo; Peter Kämpfer; Jeffrey D Newman; John R McQuiston
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 2.747

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.