Literature DB >> 23934253

DNA-DNA hybridization study of strains of Chryseobacterium, Elizabethkingia and Empedobacter and of other usually indole-producing non-fermenters of CDC groups IIc, IIe, IIh and IIi, mostly from human clinical sources, and proposals of Chryseobacterium bernardetii sp. nov., Chryseobacterium carnis sp. nov., Chryseobacterium lactis sp. nov., Chryseobacterium nakagawai sp. nov. and Chryseobacterium taklimakanense comb. nov.

B Holmes1, A G Steigerwalt2, A C Nicholson2.   

Abstract

The taxonomic classification of 182 phenotypically similar isolates was evaluated using DNA-DNA hybridization and 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. These bacterial isolates were mainly derived from clinical sources; all were Gram-negative non-fermenters and most were indole-producing. Phenotypically, they resembled species from the genera Chryseobacterium, Elizabethkingia or Empedobacter or belonged to CDC groups IIc, IIe, IIh and IIi. Based on these analyses, four novel species are described: Chryseobacterium bernardetii sp. nov. (type strain NCTC 13530(T) = CCUG 60564(T) = CDC G229(T)), Chryseobacterium carnis sp. nov. (type strain NCTC 13525(T) = CCUG 60559(T) = CDC G81(T)), Chryseobacterium lactis sp. nov. (type strain NCTC 11390(T) = CCUG 60566(T) = CDC KC1864(T)) and Chryseobacterium nakagawai sp. nov. (type strain NCTC 13529(T) = CCUG 60563(T) = CDC G41(T)). The new combination Chryseobacterium taklimakanense comb. nov. (type strain NCTC 13490(T) = X-65(T) = CCTCC AB 208154(T) = NRRL B-51322(T)) is also proposed to accommodate the reclassified Planobacterium taklimakanense.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23934253      PMCID: PMC4626006          DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.054353-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol        ISSN: 1466-5026            Impact factor:   2.747


  21 in total

Review 1.  What's in a Name? New Bacterial Species and Changes to Taxonomic Status from 2012 through 2015.

Authors:  Erik Munson; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of the Vitek MS and Bruker Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry Systems for Identification of Chryseobacterium Isolates from Clinical Specimens and Report of Uncommon Chryseobacterium Infections in Humans.

Authors:  Jiun-Nong Lin; Shih-Hua Teng; Chung-Hsu Lai; Chih-Hui Yang; Yi-Han Huang; Hsiu-Fang Lin; Hsi-Hsun Lin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Chryseobacterium chengduensis sp. nov. isolated from the air of captive giant panda enclosures in Chengdu, China.

Authors:  Cai-Fang Wen; Li-Xin Xi; Shan Zhao; Zhong-Xiang Hao; Lu Luo; Hong Liao; Zhen-Rong Chen; Rong She; Guo-Quan Han; San-Jie Cao; Rui Wu; Qi-Gui Yan; Rong Hou
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.066

4.  Revisiting the taxonomy of the genus Elizabethkingia using whole-genome sequencing, optical mapping, and MALDI-TOF, along with proposal of three novel Elizabethkingia species: Elizabethkingia bruuniana sp. nov., Elizabethkingia ursingii sp. nov., and Elizabethkingia occulta sp. nov.

Authors:  Ainsley C Nicholson; Christopher A Gulvik; Anne M Whitney; Ben W Humrighouse; James Graziano; Brian Emery; Melissa Bell; Vladimir Loparev; Phalasy Juieng; Jarrett Gartin; Chantal Bizet; Dominique Clermont; Alexis Criscuolo; Sylvain Brisse; John R McQuiston
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.271

5.  Analysis of 1,000 Type-Strain Genomes Improves Taxonomic Classification of Bacteroidetes.

Authors:  Marina García-López; Jan P Meier-Kolthoff; Brian J Tindall; Sabine Gronow; Tanja Woyke; Nikos C Kyrpides; Richard L Hahnke; Markus Göker
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Differences in Clinical Manifestations, Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns, and Mutations of Fluoroquinolone Target Genes between Chryseobacterium gleum and Chryseobacterium indologenes.

Authors:  Jiun-Nong Lin; Chung-Hsu Lai; Chih-Hui Yang; Yi-Han Huang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Draft Genome Sequences of Strains Representing Each of the Elizabethkingia Genomospecies Previously Determined by DNA-DNA Hybridization.

Authors:  Ainsley C Nicholson; Ben W Humrighouse; James C Graziano; Brian Emery; John R McQuiston
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2016-03-10

8.  Pathogenic Elizabethkingia miricola Infection in Cultured Black-Spotted Frogs, China, 2016.

Authors:  Ruixue Hu; Junfa Yuan; Yin Meng; Zhe Wang; Zemao Gu
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Evolutionary dynamics and genomic features of the Elizabethkingia anophelis 2015 to 2016 Wisconsin outbreak strain.

Authors:  Amandine Perrin; Elise Larsonneur; Ainsley C Nicholson; David J Edwards; Kristin M Gundlach; Anne M Whitney; Christopher A Gulvik; Melissa E Bell; Olaya Rendueles; Jean Cury; Perrine Hugon; Dominique Clermont; Vincent Enouf; Vladimir Loparev; Phalasy Juieng; Timothy Monson; David Warshauer; Lina I Elbadawi; Maroya Spalding Walters; Matthew B Crist; Judith Noble-Wang; Gwen Borlaug; Eduardo P C Rocha; Alexis Criscuolo; Marie Touchon; Jeffrey P Davis; Kathryn E Holt; John R McQuiston; Sylvain Brisse
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Determination of Elizabethkingia Diversity by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry and Whole-Genome Sequencing.

Authors:  Helle Brander Eriksen; Heidi Gumpert; Cecilie Haase Faurholt; Henrik Westh
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.