Literature DB >> 32704199

What is the role of distributed energy resources under scenarios of greenhouse gas reductions? A specific focus on combined heat and power systems in the industrial and commercial sectors.

P Ozge Kaplan1, Jonathan W Witt2.   

Abstract

Combined heat and power (CHP) is promoted as an economical, energy-efficient option for reducing air emissions, mitigating carbon emissions and reducing reliance on grid electricity. However, its potential benefits have only been analyzed within the context of the current energy system. To fully examine the viability of CHP as a clean-technology alternative, its growth must be analyzed considering how the energy sector may transform under the influence of various technological and policy drivers that are specifically geared toward limiting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Scenarios were developed through a bottom-up technology model of the U.S. energy system to determine the impacts on CHP development and both system-wide and sectoral GHG and air pollutant emissions. Various scenarios were considered, from CO2 emissions reductions in the electric generating units (EGU) sector to GHG reductions across the whole energy system while considering levels of CHP investment. The largest CHP investments were observed in scenarios that limited CO2 emission from the EGU sector alone. The investments were scaled back in the scenarios that incorporated energy system level GHG reductions. The energy system level reduction scenarios yielded rapid transformation of the EGU sector towards zeroemissions technologies as reliance on electricity increases with the electrification of the many end-use sectors such as buildings, transportation and industrial sectors, reducing investment in CHP. The prime mover and fuel choice heavily influenced the air pollutant emissions resulting in trade-offs among pollutants including GHG emissions. The results suggest that CHP could play a role in a future low-carbon energy system, but that role diminishes as carbon reduction targets increase.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbon reduction scenarios; Combined heat and power; Distributed energy resources; Energy efficiency; Energy system analysis; Industrial sector

Year:  2019        PMID: 32704199      PMCID: PMC7377250          DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Energy        ISSN: 0306-2619            Impact factor:   9.746


  8 in total

1.  The technology path to deep greenhouse gas emissions cuts by 2050: the pivotal role of electricity.

Authors:  James H Williams; Andrew DeBenedictis; Rebecca Ghanadan; Amber Mahone; Jack Moore; William R Morrow; Snuller Price; Margaret S Torn
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Optimizing U.S. mitigation strategies for the light-duty transportation sector: what we learn from a bottom-up model.

Authors:  Sonia Yeh; Alex Farrell; Richard Plevin; Alan Sanstad; John Weyant
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  GLIMPSE: a rapid decision framework for energy and environmental policy.

Authors:  Farhan H Akhtar; Robert W Pinder; Daniel H Loughlin; Daven K Henze
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 4.  Net-zero emissions energy systems.

Authors:  Steven J Davis; Nathan S Lewis; Matthew Shaner; Sonia Aggarwal; Doug Arent; Inês L Azevedo; Sally M Benson; Thomas Bradley; Jack Brouwer; Yet-Ming Chiang; Christopher T M Clack; Armond Cohen; Stephen Doig; Jae Edmonds; Paul Fennell; Christopher B Field; Bryan Hannegan; Bri-Mathias Hodge; Martin I Hoffert; Eric Ingersoll; Paulina Jaramillo; Klaus S Lackner; Katharine J Mach; Michael Mastrandrea; Joan Ogden; Per F Peterson; Daniel L Sanchez; Daniel Sperling; Joseph Stagner; Jessika E Trancik; Chi-Jen Yang; Ken Caldeira
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Chemistry and the Linkages between Air Quality and Climate Change.

Authors:  Erika von Schneidemesser; Paul S Monks; James D Allan; Lori Bruhwiler; Piers Forster; David Fowler; Axel Lauer; William T Morgan; Pauli Paasonen; Mattia Righi; Katerina Sindelarova; Mark A Sutton
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  Role of natural gas in meeting an electric sector emissions reduction strategy and effects on greenhouse gas emissions.

Authors:  Carol Lenox; P Ozge Kaplan
Journal:  Energy Econ       Date:  2016

7.  Evolution of the United States Energy System and Related Emissions under Varying Social and Technological Development Paradigms: Plausible Scenarios for Use in Robust Decision Making.

Authors:  Kristen E Brown; Troy A Hottle; Rubenka Bandyopadhyay; Samaneh Babaee; Rebecca S Dodder; P Ozge Kaplan; Carol S Lenox; Daniel H Loughlin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Accounting for climate and air quality damages in future U.S. electricity generation scenarios.

Authors:  Kristen E Brown; Daven K Henze; Jana B Milford
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 9.028

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Transportation emissions scenarios for New York City under different carbon intensities of electricity and electric vehicle adoption rates.

Authors:  Mine Isik; Rebecca Dodder; P Ozge Kaplan
Journal:  Nat Energy       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 60.858

2.  Understanding Technology, Fuel, Market and Policy Drivers for New York State's Power Sector Transformation.

Authors:  Mine Isik; P Ozge Kaplan
Journal:  Sustainability       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 3.251

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.