Literature DB >> 24044746

GLIMPSE: a rapid decision framework for energy and environmental policy.

Farhan H Akhtar1, Robert W Pinder, Daniel H Loughlin, Daven K Henze.   

Abstract

Over the coming decades, new energy production technologies and the policies that oversee them will affect human health, the vitality of our ecosystems, and the stability of the global climate. The GLIMPSE decision model framework provides insights about the implications of technology and policy decisions on these outcomes. Using GLIMPSE, decision makers can identify alternative techno-policy futures, examining their air quality, health, and short- and long-term climate impacts. Ultimately, GLIMPSE will support the identification of cost-effective strategies for simultaneously achieving performance goals for these metrics. Here, we demonstrate the utility of GLIMPSE by analyzing several future energy scenarios under existing air quality regulations and potential CO2 emission reduction policies. We find opportunities for substantial cobenefits in setting both climate change mitigation and health-benefit based air quality improvement targets. Though current policies which prioritize public health protection increase near-term warming, establishing policies that also reduce greenhouse gas emissions may offset warming in the near-term and lead to significant reductions in long-term warming.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24044746     DOI: 10.1021/es402283j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

1.  Role of natural gas in meeting an electric sector emissions reduction strategy and effects on greenhouse gas emissions.

Authors:  Carol Lenox; P Ozge Kaplan
Journal:  Energy Econ       Date:  2016

2.  Evolution of the United States Energy System and Related Emissions under Varying Social and Technological Development Paradigms: Plausible Scenarios for Use in Robust Decision Making.

Authors:  Kristen E Brown; Troy A Hottle; Rubenka Bandyopadhyay; Samaneh Babaee; Rebecca S Dodder; P Ozge Kaplan; Carol S Lenox; Daniel H Loughlin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  What is the role of distributed energy resources under scenarios of greenhouse gas reductions? A specific focus on combined heat and power systems in the industrial and commercial sectors.

Authors:  P Ozge Kaplan; Jonathan W Witt
Journal:  Appl Energy       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 9.746

4.  Estimating environmental co-benefits of U.S. low-carbon pathways using an integrated assessment model with state-level resolution.

Authors:  Yang Ou; Wenjing Shi; Steven J Smith; Catherine M Ledna; J Jason West; Christopher G Nolte; Daniel H Loughlin
Journal:  Appl Energy       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 9.746

5.  Effects of recent energy system changes on CO2 projections for the United States.

Authors:  Carol S Lenox; Daniel H Loughlin
Journal:  Clean Technol Environ Policy       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  Scenarios for Low Carbon and Low Water Electric Power Plant Operations: Implications for Upstream Water Use.

Authors:  Rebecca S Dodder; Jessica T Barnwell; William H Yelverton
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 9.028

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.