Literature DB >> 24754840

Implications of shale gas development for climate change.

Richard G Newell1, Daniel Raimi.   

Abstract

Advances in technologies for extracting oil and gas from shale formations have dramatically increased U.S. production of natural gas. As production expands domestically and abroad, natural gas prices will be lower than without shale gas. Lower prices have two main effects: increasing overall energy consumption, and encouraging substitution away from sources such as coal, nuclear, renewables, and electricity. We examine the evidence and analyze modeling projections to understand how these two dynamics affect greenhouse gas emissions. Most evidence indicates that natural gas as a substitute for coal in electricity production, gasoline in transport, and electricity in buildings decreases greenhouse gases, although as an electricity substitute this depends on the electricity mix displaced. Modeling suggests that absent substantial policy changes, increased natural gas production slightly increases overall energy use, more substantially encourages fuel-switching, and that the combined effect slightly alters economy wide GHG emissions; whether the net effect is a slight decrease or increase depends on modeling assumptions including upstream methane emissions. Our main conclusions are that natural gas can help reduce GHG emissions, but in the absence of targeted climate policy measures, it will not substantially change the course of global GHG concentrations. Abundant natural gas can, however, help reduce the costs of achieving GHG reduction goals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24754840     DOI: 10.1021/es4046154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

1.  Climate change: A crack in the natural-gas bridge.

Authors:  Steven J Davis; Christine Shearer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Role of natural gas in meeting an electric sector emissions reduction strategy and effects on greenhouse gas emissions.

Authors:  Carol Lenox; P Ozge Kaplan
Journal:  Energy Econ       Date:  2016

Review 3.  A review of the public health impacts of unconventional natural gas development.

Authors:  P J Saunders; D McCoy; R Goldstein; A T Saunders; A Munroe
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  Limited impact on decadal-scale climate change from increased use of natural gas.

Authors:  Haewon McJeon; Jae Edmonds; Nico Bauer; Leon Clarke; Brian Fisher; Brian P Flannery; Jérôme Hilaire; Volker Krey; Giacomo Marangoni; Raymond Mi; Keywan Riahi; Holger Rogner; Massimo Tavoni
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Unconventional oil and gas development and risk of childhood leukemia: Assessing the evidence.

Authors:  Elise G Elliott; Pauline Trinh; Xiaomei Ma; Brian P Leaderer; Mary H Ward; Nicole C Deziel
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-10-23       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Drivers of the US CO2 emissions 1997-2013.

Authors:  Kuishuang Feng; Steven J Davis; Laixiang Sun; Klaus Hubacek
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 14.919

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.