| Literature DB >> 32331355 |
Bjorn Kaijun Betzler1, Tyler Hyungtaek Rim2,3, Charumathi Sabanayagam2,3, Chui Ming Gemmy Cheung2,3, Ching-Yu Cheng2,3,4.
Abstract
There is limited understanding of the specific role of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in the development of various age-related ocular diseases, despite it being a common measurable biomarker in lipid profiles. This literature review summarizes current knowledge of the role of HDL-C, if any, in pathogenesis and progression of four age-related ocular diseases, namely age-related macular degeneration (AMD), age-related cataract, glaucoma, and diabetic retinopathy (DR), and will primarily discuss epidemiological and genetic evidence.Entities:
Keywords: age-related macular degeneration; ageing; cataract; diabetic retinopathy; dyslipidaemia; glaucoma; high-density lipoprotein; intraocular pressure; macular edema; visual impairment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32331355 PMCID: PMC7226134 DOI: 10.3390/biom10040645
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
HDL-C and AMD—Epidemiological Links from Observational Studies (Selected)
| Author (Year) | Study Design | Study Population | Results/Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colijn et al. (2019) [ | Pooled analysis of cross-sectional data | n = 32,483 | Serum HDL was associated with increased odds of AMD (OR = 1.21 per 1-mmol/l increase; 95% CI = 1.14–1.29, |
| Saunier et al. (2018) [ | Population Based Cohort | n = 963 | Incidence of early AMD was associated with high HDL-C levels (HR = 1.2; 95%CI = 1.0–1.4). |
| Cheung et al (2017) | Case Control study examining the association between lipoprotein profile and | n = 193 | AMD is associated with increased HDL serum concentration. For each SD increase in serum HDL particles, a 26% increase in nAMD risk was observed ( |
| Wang et al. (2016) [ | Meta-Analysis | 19 studies | Serum HDL increment of 1 mmol/L significantly increased AMD risk by 18% (RR = 1.18; 95% CI = 1.01–1.35; I2 = 53.8%; |
| Paun et al. (2015) [ | Case Control Cohort | 1491 cases, | AMD patients had significantly higher (p-value = 4.4 × 10−5) HDL-C levels. Significant positive correlation between HDL-C and complement activation level (C3d/C3 ratio). ( |
| Cho et al. (2014) [ | Population Based Cross Sectional | n = 7899 | Upon multivariate analyses, serum HDL was a significant risk factor for the presence of any AMD type. (Unit of increment = 5 mg/dL (0.13 mmol/L); OR = 1.09; 95% CI 1.02–1.18; |
| Jonasson et al. (2014) [ | Population Based Cohort | n = 2868 | In multivariate models, incident AMD was significantly associated with HDL-C. (OR = 1.62 per mmol/L; 95% CI 1.19-2.22; p-value < 0.01). |
| Klein et al. (2010) [ | Cross-sectional | n = 2810 | Odds of early AMD decreased by approximately 10% per 5mg/dL (0.13 mmol/L) increase in HDL level. (OR = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.83–0.998). |
| Tan et al. (2007) [ | Population Based Cohort | n = 3654 | Increasing HDL-C was inversely related to incident late AMD (RR per SD increase = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.56–0.99). Elevated total/HDL cholesterol ratio predicted late AMD (RR per SD increase = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.07–1.70) and Geographic atrophy (RR per SD = 1.63; 95% CI = 1.18–2.25). |
|
| |||
HDL-C and AMD—Laboratory Evidence Regarding Possible Pathological Mechanisms (Selected Studies)
| Author (Year) | Study Design | Results/Findings |
|---|---|---|
| Burgess et al (2017) [ | 2-sample Mendelian randomization to assess known lipid gene associations with AMD risk on 33,536 individuals | Reported that HDL-C is a causal risk factor for AMD (OR = 1.22; 95%CI = 1.03–1.44 per 1 SD increase in HDL-C. Variants in the |
| Haapasalo et al (2015) [ | Experimental Study | Using affinity chromatography and mass spectrometry, it was found that CFH interacts with serum ApoE via FH5-7 domains. Binding of CFH to ApoE on HDL particles prevents excessive alternative pathway activation and protects HDL particles in plasma. HDL has a role in reducing alternative pathway activation, at least partially due to binding of complement regulators CFH and clusterin to HDL particles. |
| Cheng et al. (2015) [ | Genome-wide and exome-wide association study on 2119 patients with exudative AMD | Reported a strong association between CETP Asp442Gly (rs2303790), an East Asian-specific mutation, and increased risk of AMD (OR = 1.70, |
| Toomey et al (2015) [ | Animal Study (mice). In vivo investigation of sub-RPE deposit formation in aged Cfh+/− and Cfh−/− mice | Complement factor H (CFH) is a major susceptibility gene for AMD. Decreased levels of CFH induce sub-retinal pigmented epithelium (sub-RPE) deposit formation, leading to complement activation, which contributes to RPE damage and visual function impairment. Mechanistically, deposits are due to CFH competition for lipoprotein binding sites in Bruch’s membrane. |
| Ristau et al (2014) [ | Analysis of genetic AMD risk polymorphisms and systemic complement activation | Variants in |
| Chen W et al (2010) [ | Genome-wide association scan for AMD in 2157 cases and 1150 controls | Identified a susceptibility locus for AMD near TIMP3 ( |
| Gordon et al (2010) [ | Proteomic Analysis of HDL-C fractionated by Gel Filtration Chromatography | Identified 14 new phospholipid associated proteins that migrate with HDL. These include complement C1q subcomponent subunits B and C which function in activation of the classical pathway and ficolin-3, involved in complement activation via the lectin pathway. Complement C1s, C2, C5, factor B and plasma protease C1 inhibitor, were also found in HDL-C fractions. |
|
| ||
HDL-C and Age-Related Cataracts—Epidemiological Links from Observational Studies (Selected).
| Author (Year) | Study Design | Study Population | Results/Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Li S et al. (2018) [ | Cross sectional case control | 219 cases | HDL-C level did not differ significantly between the age-related cataract group and control group ( |
| Park et al. (2015) [ | Population based cross-sectional | n = 2852 | Low HDL-C was not significantly associated with any type of cataract. |
| Park et al. (2014) [ | Population based cross-sectional | n = 11,076 | Reduced HDL-C levels were significantly associated with cataract in women (OR = 1.27; 95% CI = 1.07–1.50). |
| Ghaem Maralani et al. (2013) [ | Population-based prospective cohort study10-year follow-up | n = 1997 | Low HDL-C was significantly associated with increased incidence of cortical cataract at 10-year follow-up (HR = 1.57; 95%CI = 1.10–2.24, |
| Sabanayagam et al. (2011) [ | Population-based cross-sectional study | n = 2794 | Insignificant association found between low-serum HDL-C and cataract. (Multivariate OR = 1.11; 95%CI = 0.88–1.40; |
| Paunksnis et al. (2007) [ | Population based cross-sectional | n = 1282 | Insignificant increase in odds of cataract among women with decreased serum HDL-C (OR = 1.24, 95%CI = 0.77-1.99, |
| Hiller et al. (2003) [ | Case-control | n = 1684 | HDL-C < 35 mg/dl (< 0.9051 mmol/L) was significantly associated with decreased risk of Posterior subcapsular cataract in men (OR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.94-0.99; |
| Meyer et al. (2003) [ | Cross-sectional | n = 115 | Subjects with serum HDL-C < 1.5 have seven-fold odds of falling in the cataract subgroup compared to those with HDL-C levels ≥ 1.5 mmol/l (OR = 7.33; 95% CI = 2.06–26.10; |
|
| |||
HDL-C and Glaucoma—Epidemiological Links from Observational Studies (Selected)
| Author (Year) | Study Design | Study Population | Results/Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cui et al. (2019) [ | Population-based cross-sectional | n = 2112 | Multiple regression analysis revealed that higher IOP was significantly associated with lower HDL-C. (Mean IOP difference between low and high HDL-C group = −0.678; 95%CI = −0.993 to −0.363; |
| Shon et al. (2019) [ | Population-based cross-sectional | n = 16,939 | No significant difference in plasma HDL-C levels between the groups being treated and not being treated for glaucoma. |
| Wang et al. (2018) [ | Meta-analysis | 10 studies | Low serum HDL-C showed no significant relationship with IOP. (Pooled Z = −0.03; 95%CI = −0.06 to 0.01, |
| Kurtul et al. (2017) [ | Cross-sectional | n = 119 | Serum HDL-C levels did not differ significantly between groups of patients with and without pseudo-exfoliation glaucoma (control: 1.22 ± 0.39 mmol/L; glaucoma 1.14 ± 0.28 mmol/L; |
| Yokomichi et al. (2016) [ | Cross-sectional and longitudinal arms | n = 20,007 (cross-sectional) | Variable of HDL-C, +1 mmol/L was significantly associated with a +0.42 mm Hg IOP change (95% CI = 0.35–0.49, |
| Kim et al. (2015) [ | Retrospective cross-sectional | n = 155,198 | After multivariate analysis adjusting for age, sex and other variables, HDL-C and IOP are positively correlated. (Coefficient β (SE) = 0.002 (0.001), |
| Kim MJ et al. (2014) [ | Retrospective population- based case control | n = 17,901 | Multivariate analysis found that low HDL-C was significantly associated with primary open angle glaucoma with normal baseline IOP (OR = 0.96, 95%CI = 0.94–0.99; |
| Kim YH et al. (2014) [ | Population based cross-sectional | n = 4875 | No significant difference in IOP between the group with low HDL-C and the control group ( |
|
| |||
HDL-C and Diabetic Retinopathy—Epidemiological Links from Observational studies (Selected)
| Author (Year) | Study Design | Study Population | Results/Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sasso et al. (2019) [ | Cross-sectional | n = 2068 | Diabetic retinopathy was independently associated with HDL-C (OR = 1.042; 95% CI = 1.012–1.109; |
| Das et al. (2015) [ | Meta-analysis | 21 relevant articles | HDL-C levels were insignificantly higher in the presence of DME (mean difference between groups = 0.0582 mmol/L; 95%CI = −3.62 × 10−3 to 0.125, |
| Sacks et al. (2014) [ | Case-control | n = 2535 | Odds ratio for retinopathy associated with a quintile increase of serum HDL-C (≈ 0.2 mmol/L) was insignificant (OR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.90–1.05; |
| Morton et al. (2012) [ | Population based prospective cohort | n = 11,140 | No association between baseline HDL-C and the risk of diabetic retinopathy or any specific type of retinal event. |
| Wong et al. (2008) [ | Population based | n = 3261 | Insignificant association between low serum HDL-C and retinopathy (OR = 1.18; 95%; CI = 0.62–2.26; |
| Rema et al. (2006) [ | Population based | n = 1736 | No significant difference in serum HDL-C levels in Type 2 DM patients with retinopathy compared with those without retinopathy. |
| Lyons et al. (2004) [ | Population based | n = 988 | ETDRS scoring utilized. Measurement of lipoprotein subclass using nuclear magnetic resonance showed that more severe retinopathy was significantly associated with lower HDL-C levels. |
| Miljanovic et al (2004) [ | Population-based prospective study | n = 1441 | Serum HDL-C was not significantly associated with development of CSME. However, higher total–to–HDL cholesterol ratio (RR = 3.84, 95%CI = 1.58–9.36, |
|
| |||