Objective: Cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC), the ability of extracellular acceptors to pick-up cholesterol from macrophages, is a clinically relevant cardiovascular biomarker. CEC is inversely associated with incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events. However, CEC is only modestly associated with HDL-C (high-density lipoprotein cholesterol) levels, which may explain the failure of HDL-C raising therapies to improve atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease outcomes. Determinants of variation in CEC are not well understood. Thus, we sought to establish whether extreme high and low CEC is a robust persistent phenotype and to characterize associations with cholesterol, protein, and phospholipids across the particle size distribution. Approach and Results: CEC was previously measured in 2924 participants enrolled in the Dallas Heart Study, a multi-ethnic population-based study from 2000 to 2002. We prospectively recruited those who were below the 10th and above 90th percentile of CEC. Our study revealed that extreme low and high CEC are persistent, robust phenotypes after 15 years of follow-up. Using size exclusion chromatography, CEC to fractionated plasma depleted of apolipoprotein B (fraction-specific CEC) demonstrated significant differences in CEC patterns between persistent high and low efflux groups. Fraction-specific CEC was correlated with fraction-specific total phospholipid but not apolipoprotein A-I, cholesterol, or total protein. These correlations varied across the size distribution and differed among persistent high versus low efflux groups. Conclusions: Extreme high and low CEC are persistent and robust phenotypes. CEC patterns in fractionated plasma reveal marked variation across the size distribution. Future studies are warranted to determine specific molecular species linked to CEC in a size-specific manner.
Objective: Cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC), the ability of extracellular acceptors to pick-up cholesterol from macrophages, is a clinically relevant cardiovascular biomarker. CEC is inversely associated with incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events. However, CEC is only modestly associated with HDL-C (high-density lipoprotein cholesterol) levels, which may explain the failure of HDL-C raising therapies to improve atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease outcomes. Determinants of variation in CEC are not well understood. Thus, we sought to establish whether extreme high and low CEC is a robust persistent phenotype and to characterize associations with cholesterol, protein, and phospholipids across the particle size distribution. Approach and Results: CEC was previously measured in 2924 participants enrolled in the Dallas Heart Study, a multi-ethnic population-based study from 2000 to 2002. We prospectively recruited those who were below the 10th and above 90th percentile of CEC. Our study revealed that extreme low and high CEC are persistent, robust phenotypes after 15 years of follow-up. Using size exclusion chromatography, CEC to fractionated plasma depleted of apolipoprotein B (fraction-specific CEC) demonstrated significant differences in CEC patterns between persistent high and low efflux groups. Fraction-specific CEC was correlated with fraction-specific total phospholipid but not apolipoprotein A-I, cholesterol, or total protein. These correlations varied across the size distribution and differed among persistent high versus low efflux groups. Conclusions: Extreme high and low CEC are persistent and robust phenotypes. CEC patterns in fractionated plasma reveal marked variation across the size distribution. Future studies are warranted to determine specific molecular species linked to CEC in a size-specific manner.
Authors: Robert S Rosenson; H Bryan Brewer; W Sean Davidson; Zahi A Fayad; Valentin Fuster; James Goldstein; Marc Hellerstein; Xian-Cheng Jiang; Michael C Phillips; Daniel J Rader; Alan T Remaley; George H Rothblat; Alan R Tall; Laurent Yvan-Charvet Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-04-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Amit V Khera; Marina Cuchel; Margarita de la Llera-Moya; Amrith Rodrigues; Megan F Burke; Kashif Jafri; Benjamin C French; Julie A Phillips; Megan L Mucksavage; Robert L Wilensky; Emile R Mohler; George H Rothblat; Daniel J Rader Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-01-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sanam Ebtehaj; Eke G Gruppen; Stephan J L Bakker; Robin P F Dullaart; Uwe J F Tietge Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2019-07-18 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Amit V Khera; Olga V Demler; Steven J Adelman; Heidi L Collins; Robert J Glynn; Paul M Ridker; Daniel J Rader; Samia Mora Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-04-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Nathalie Pamir; Patrick M Hutchins; Graziella E Ronsein; Hao Wei; Chongren Tang; Riku Das; Tomas Vaisar; Edward Plow; Volker Schuster; Marlys L Koschinsky; Catherine A Reardon; Richard Weinberg; David A Dichek; Santica Marcovina; Godfrey S Getz; Jay W Heinecke Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2017-08-03
Authors: Prahlad K Rao; Kate Merath; Eugene Drigalenko; Avinash Y L Jadhav; Richard A Komorowski; Matthew I Goldblatt; Anand Rohatgi; Mark A Sarzynski; Samer Gawrieh; Michael Olivier Journal: Clin Proteomics Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 3.988
Authors: Andrea L Koekemoer; Veryan Codd; Nicholas G D Masca; Christopher P Nelson; Muntaser D Musameh; Bernhard M Kaess; Christian Hengstenberg; Daniel J Rader; Nilesh J Samani Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 8.311