Literature DB >> 32108422

The optimal use of automated office blood pressure measurement in clinical practice.

Emmanuel A Andreadis1, Charalampia V Geladari1, Epameinondas T Angelopoulos1.   

Abstract

This evidence-based article endorses the use of automated office blood pressure (AOBP). AOBP is the most favorable office blood pressure (BP) measuring technique as it provides accurate readings with 3-15 mm Hg lower values than the casual conventional office measurements with auscultatory or semi-automated oscillometric devices and relates closely to awake ABP readings. The AOBP technique seems to be superior to conventional office BP in predicting hypertension-mediated organ damage and appears to be equally reliable to awake ABP in the prediction of cardiovascular (CV) disease. AOBP readings should be obtained either unattended, with the patient alone in the examination room, or attended with the presence of personnel in the room but with no talking to the patient, although this recommendation is not frequently followed in routine clinical practice. To optimize office BP readings, the type of device, the rest period before AOBP measurements (preceding rest), and the time intervals between measurements were evaluated. As AOBP readings have the advantage of removing many confounding factors, the authors propose to perform measurements with a preceding rest in all patients at the initial visit; if AOBP readings remain <130 mm Hg in subsequent visits, measurements could be accepted, otherwise, if are higher, patients should be evaluated by out-of-office BP measurements.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  automated office blood pressure; blood pressure measurement/monitoring; hypertension; observer presence; rest

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32108422      PMCID: PMC8029694          DOI: 10.1111/jch.13837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  44 in total

1.  Evaluation of an automated sphygmomanometer for use in the office setting.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Miguel Valdivieso
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.444

2.  Home, automated office, and conventional office blood pressure as predictors of cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Andreadis; Vasilios Papademetriou; Charalampia V Geladari; George N Kolyvas; Epameinondas T Angelopoulos; Konstantinos N Aronis
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2017-02-03

3.  Unfounded concerns about the use of automated office blood pressure measurement in SPRINT.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Norm R C Campbell
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2016-10-21

4.  Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.

Authors:  Stefano Omboni; Isabella Riva; Alessia Giglio; Gianluca Caldara; Antonella Groppelli; Gianfranco Parati
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.444

5.  Methodology and technology for peripheral and central blood pressure and blood pressure variability measurement: current status and future directions - Position statement of the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on blood pressure monitoring and cardiovascular variability.

Authors:  George S Stergiou; Gianfranco Parati; Charalambos Vlachopoulos; Apostolos Achimastos; Emanouel Andreadis; Roland Asmar; Alberto Avolio; Athanase Benetos; Grzegorz Bilo; Nadia Boubouchairopoulou; Pierre Boutouyrie; Paolo Castiglioni; Alejandro de la Sierra; Eamon Dolan; Geoffrey Head; Yutaka Imai; Kazuomi Kario; Anastasios Kollias; Vasilis Kotsis; Efstathios Manios; Richard McManus; Thomas Mengden; Anastasia Mihailidou; Martin Myers; Teemu Niiranen; Juan Eugenio Ochoa; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Stefano Omboni; Paul Padfield; Paolo Palatini; Theodore Papaioannou; Athanasios Protogerou; Josep Redon; Paolo Verdecchia; Jiguang Wang; Alberto Zanchetti; Giuseppe Mancia; Eoin O'Brien
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.844

Review 6.  The optimal use of automated office blood pressure measurement in clinical practice.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Andreadis; Charalampia V Geladari; Epameinondas T Angelopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Blood Pressure Measurement in SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial).

Authors:  Karen C Johnson; Paul K Whelton; William C Cushman; Jeffrey A Cutler; Gregory W Evans; Joni K Snyder; Walter T Ambrosius; Srinivasan Beddhu; Alfred K Cheung; Lawrence J Fine; Cora E Lewis; Mahboob Rahman; David M Reboussin; Michael V Rocco; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  Response to: Does AOBP require a 5-minute rest period to screen for hypertension?

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Tracey J F Colella
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Attended and Unattended Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurements Have Better Agreement With Ambulatory Monitoring Than Conventional Office Readings.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Andreadis; Charalampia V Geladari; Epameinondas T Angelopoulos; Florentia S Savva; Anna I Georgantoni; Vasilios Papademetriou
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Automated office blood pressure measurements obtained with and without preceding rest are associated with awake ambulatory blood pressure.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Andreadis; Charalampia V Geladari; Epameinondas T Angelopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  4 in total

1.  Impact of 30- Versus 60-Second Time Intervals Between Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurements on Measured Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Stephen P Juraschek; Anthony M Ishak; Kenneth J Mukamal; Julia M Wood; Timothy S Anderson; Marc L Cohen; Jonathan X Li; Jennifer L Cluett
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 2.  The optimal use of automated office blood pressure measurement in clinical practice.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Andreadis; Charalampia V Geladari; Epameinondas T Angelopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Office blood pressure threshold of 130/80 mmHg better predicts uncontrolled out-of-office blood pressure in apparent treatment-resistant hypertension.

Authors:  Chan Joo Lee; Jeong-Ha Ha; Jang Young Kim; In-Cheol Kim; Sung Kee Ryu; Moo-Yong Rhee; Ju-Hee Lee; Jung-Hee Lee; Hae-Young Lee; Sang-Hyun Ihm; Joong Wha Chung; Jung Hyun Choi; Jinho Shin; Sungha Park; Kazuomi Kario
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  More reasons to use automated office blood pressure in clinical practice.

Authors:  Martin G Myers
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.