Literature DB >> 29531173

Blood Pressure Measurement in SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial).

Karen C Johnson1, Paul K Whelton2, William C Cushman2, Jeffrey A Cutler2, Gregory W Evans2, Joni K Snyder2, Walter T Ambrosius2, Srinivasan Beddhu2, Alfred K Cheung2, Lawrence J Fine2, Cora E Lewis2, Mahboob Rahman2, David M Reboussin2, Michael V Rocco2, Suzanne Oparil2, Jackson T Wright2.   

Abstract

Recent publications have stated that the blood pressure (BP) measurement technique used in SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) was unattended. However, the SPRINT protocol does not address the issue of attendance. A survey was conducted immediately after SPRINT closeout visits were completed to inquire whether BP measurements were usually attended or unattended by staff. There were 4082 participants at 38 sites that measured BP after leaving the participant alone the entire time (always alone), 2247 at 25 sites that had personnel in the room the entire time (never alone), 1746 at 19 sites that left the participant alone only during the rest period (alone for rest), and 570 at 6 sites that left the participant alone only during the BP readings (alone for BP measurement). Similar systolic and diastolic BPs within randomized groups were noted during follow-up at the majority of visits in all 4 measurement categories. In the always alone and never alone categories, the intensive group had a similarly reduced risk for the primary outcome compared with the standard group (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.76 and hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.91, respectively; pairwise interaction P value, 0.88); risk was not significantly reduced for the intensive group in the smaller alone-for-rest and the alone-for-BP-measurement categories. Similar BP levels and cardiovascular disease risk reduction were observed in the intensive group in SPRINT participants whether the measurement technique used was primarily attended or unattended. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01206062.
© 2018 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood pressure; cardiovascular diseases; hazard ratio; hypertension; risk

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29531173      PMCID: PMC5967644          DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  30 in total

1.  Relationship of blood pressure to 25-year mortality due to coronary heart disease, cardiovascular diseases, and all causes in young adult men: the Chicago Heart Association Detection Project in Industry.

Authors:  K Miura; M L Daviglus; A R Dyer; K Liu; D B Garside; J Stamler; P Greenland
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2001-06-25

2.  Executive Summary: Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics--2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Dariush Mozaffarian; Emelia J Benjamin; Alan S Go; Donna K Arnett; Michael J Blaha; Mary Cushman; Sandeep R Das; Sarah de Ferranti; Jean-Pierre Després; Heather J Fullerton; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Suzanne E Judd; Brett M Kissela; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Rachel H Mackey; David J Magid; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Paul Muntner; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Robert W Neumar; Graham Nichol; Latha Palaniappan; Dilip K Pandey; Mathew J Reeves; Carlos J Rodriguez; Wayne Rosamond; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Amytis Towfighi; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Daniel Woo; Robert W Yeh; Melanie B Turner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: Part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering; John E Hall; Lawrence J Appel; Bonita E Falkner; John Graves; Martha N Hill; Daniel W Jones; Theodore Kurtz; Sheldon G Sheps; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2004-12-20       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 4.  Effects of different regimens to lower blood pressure on major cardiovascular events in older and younger adults: meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  F Turnbull; B Neal; T Ninomiya; C Algert; H Arima; F Barzi; C Bulpitt; J Chalmers; R Fagard; A Gleason; S Heritier; N Li; V Perkovic; M Woodward; S MacMahon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-05-14

5.  Response by Bakris to Letter Regarding Article, "The Implications of Blood Pressure Measurement Methods on Treatment Targets for Blood Pressure".

Authors:  George Bakris
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  The design and rationale of a multicenter clinical trial comparing two strategies for control of systolic blood pressure: the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).

Authors:  Walter T Ambrosius; Kaycee M Sink; Capri G Foy; Dan R Berlowitz; Alfred K Cheung; William C Cushman; Lawrence J Fine; David C Goff; Karen C Johnson; Anthony A Killeen; Cora E Lewis; Suzanne Oparil; David M Reboussin; Michael V Rocco; Joni K Snyder; Jeff D Williamson; Jackson T Wright; Paul K Whelton
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.486

7.  Effect of Intensive Versus Standard Clinic-Based Hypertension Management on Ambulatory Blood Pressure: Results From the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) Ambulatory Blood Pressure Study.

Authors:  Paul E Drawz; Nicholas M Pajewski; Jeffrey T Bates; Natalie A Bello; William C Cushman; Jamie P Dwyer; Lawrence J Fine; David C Goff; William E Haley; Marie Krousel-Wood; Andrew McWilliams; Dena E Rifkin; Yelena Slinin; Addison Taylor; Raymond Townsend; Barry Wall; Jackson T Wright; Mahboob Rahman
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  The Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP): an intervention trial on isolated systolic hypertension. SHEP Cooperative Research Group.

Authors:  J L Probstfield; W B Applegate; N O Borhani; J D Curb; J A Cutler; B R Davis; C D Furberg; C M Hawkins; E Lakatos; L B Page
Journal:  Clin Exp Hypertens A       Date:  1989

9.  Hypertension optimal treatment (HOT) study: home blood pressure in treated hypertensive subjects.

Authors:  S E Kjeldsen; T Hedner; K Jamerson; S Julius; W E Haley; M Zabalgoitia; A R Butt; S N Rahman; L Hansson
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering; John E Hall; Lawrence J Appel; Bonita E Falkner; John Graves; Martha N Hill; Daniel W Jones; Theodore Kurtz; Sheldon G Sheps; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  84 in total

1.  Influence of Prediabetes on the Effects of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Control on Kidney Events.

Authors:  Naveen Rathi; Paul K Whelton; Glenn M Chertow; William C Cushman; Alfred K Cheung; Guo Wei; Robert Boucher; Paul L Kimmel; Adam P Bress; Holly J Kramer; Catreena Al-Marji; Tom Greene; Srinivasan Beddhu
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 2.  Automated Office-Based Blood Pressure Measurement: an Overview and Guidance for Implementation in Primary Care.

Authors:  Romsai T Boonyasai; Erika L McCannon; Joseph E Landavaso
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 3.  Dangers of Overly Aggressive Blood Pressure Control.

Authors:  Faisal Rahman; John W McEvoy
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  History and Justification of a National Blood Pressure Measurement Validated Device Listing.

Authors:  Jordana B Cohen; Raj S Padwal; Michael Gutkin; Beverly B Green; Michael J Bloch; F Wilford Germino; Domenic A Sica; Anthony J Viera; Benjamin M Bluml; William B White; Sandra J Taler; Steven Yarows; Daichi Shimbo; Raymond R Townsend
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 5.  Cost-Effectiveness and Challenges of Implementing Intensive Blood Pressure Goals and Team-Based Care.

Authors:  Catherine G Derington; Jordan B King; Kelsey B Bryant; Blake T McGee; Andrew E Moran; William S Weintraub; Brandon K Bellows; Adam P Bress
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 6.  Blood Pressure Assessment in Adults in Clinical Practice and Clinic-Based Research: JACC Scientific Expert Panel.

Authors:  Paul Muntner; Paula T Einhorn; William C Cushman; Paul K Whelton; Natalie A Bello; Paul E Drawz; Beverly B Green; Daniel W Jones; Stephen P Juraschek; Karen L Margolis; Edgar R Miller; Ann Marie Navar; Yechiam Ostchega; Michael K Rakotz; Bernard Rosner; Joseph E Schwartz; Daichi Shimbo; George S Stergiou; Raymond R Townsend; Jeff D Williamson; Jackson T Wright; Lawrence J Appel
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Accurate Blood Pressure in the Office.

Authors:  Wanpen Vongpatanasin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Prevalence of Hypertension and Cardiovascular Risk According to Blood Pressure Thresholds Used for Diagnosis.

Authors:  Julio A Lamprea-Montealegre; Leila R Zelnick; Yoshio N Hall; Nisha Bansal; Ian H de Boer
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  Sprinting Toward the Optimal Blood Pressure Target for Hypertensive Patients.

Authors:  Suzanne Oparil; William C Cushman; Karen C Johnson; Dalane W Kitzman; Paul K Whelton; Jackson T Wright
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 10.  Blood Pressure Goals in Patients with CKD: A Review of Evidence and Guidelines.

Authors:  Alex R Chang; Meghan Lóser; Rakesh Malhotra; Lawrence J Appel
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 8.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.