Literature DB >> 22514038

Evaluation of an automated sphygmomanometer for use in the office setting.

Martin G Myers1, Miguel Valdivieso.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the WatchBP Office sphygmomanometer can be used to obtain automated office blood pressure (AOBP) readings that are similar to the awake ambulatory BP.
METHODS: One hundred patients referred for 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring had BP recorded three times using the WatchBP Office fully automated sphygmomanometer in accordance with standard AOBP measurement guidelines. The mean AOBP was compared with the mean awake ambulatory BP.
RESULTS: The mean (± SD) AOBP (138.6 ± 13.7/79.7 ± 9.0 mmHg) was similar to the mean awake ambulatory BP (136.8 ± 12.4/79.0 ± 10.8 mmHg). The small difference in systolic BP (1.8 mmHg) was statistically significant (P=0.03), but was within the accepted range (5 mmHg) recommended by guidelines for equivalence between BP readings. There was a strong correlation (P<0.001) between the systolic/diastolic AOBP and awake ambulatory BP readings (r=0.819/0.801).
CONCLUSION: The WatchBP Office produces BP readings that closely approximate the awake ambulatory BP, confirming that this automated sphygmomanometer is suitable for recording AOBP in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22514038     DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3283540785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Press Monit        ISSN: 1359-5237            Impact factor:   1.444


  16 in total

Review 1.  Automated Office-Based Blood Pressure Measurement: an Overview and Guidance for Implementation in Primary Care.

Authors:  Romsai T Boonyasai; Erika L McCannon; Joseph E Landavaso
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Blood Pressure Assessment in Adults in Clinical Practice and Clinic-Based Research: JACC Scientific Expert Panel.

Authors:  Paul Muntner; Paula T Einhorn; William C Cushman; Paul K Whelton; Natalie A Bello; Paul E Drawz; Beverly B Green; Daniel W Jones; Stephen P Juraschek; Karen L Margolis; Edgar R Miller; Ann Marie Navar; Yechiam Ostchega; Michael K Rakotz; Bernard Rosner; Joseph E Schwartz; Daichi Shimbo; George S Stergiou; Raymond R Townsend; Jeff D Williamson; Jackson T Wright; Lawrence J Appel
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  The 2017 Focused Update of the Guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology (TSOC) and the Taiwan Hypertension Society (THS) for the Management of Hypertension.

Authors:  Chern-En Chiang; Tzung-Dau Wang; Tsung-Hsien Lin; Hung-I Yeh; Ping-Yen Liu; Hao-Min Cheng; Ting-Hsing Chao; Chen-Huan Chen; Kou-Gi Shyu; Kwo-Chang Ueng; Chung-Yin Chen; Pao-Hsien Chu; Shih-Hsien Sung; Kang-Ling Wang; Yi-Heng Li; Kuo-Yang Wang; Fu-Tien Chiang; Wen-Ter Lai; Jyh-Hong Chen; Wen-Jone Chen; San-Jou Yeh; Ming-Fong Chen; Shing-Jong Lin; Jiunn-Lee Lin
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.672

4.  Unattended versus attended automated office blood pressure: Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using the same methodology for both methods.

Authors:  Anastasios Kollias; Emelina Stambolliu; Konstantinos G Kyriakoulis; Areti Gravvani; George S Stergiou
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-12-25       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Unattended automated office blood pressure measurement: Time efficiency and barriers to implementation/utilization.

Authors:  John Doane; Michael Flynn; Marcus Archibald; Dominick Ramirez; Molly B Conroy; Barry Stults
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 6.  The optimal use of automated office blood pressure measurement in clinical practice.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Andreadis; Charalampia V Geladari; Epameinondas T Angelopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Office blood pressure measurement in the 21st century.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Roland Asmar; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Does automated office blood pressure require a 5-minute rest period when used to screen for hypertension?

Authors:  Barry Stults; John Doane; Michael Jason Penrod; Molly B Conroy
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  More reasons to use automated office blood pressure in clinical practice.

Authors:  Martin G Myers
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Antecedent rest may not be necessary for automated office blood pressure at lower treatment targets.

Authors:  Tracey J F Colella; Anam Tahsinul; Hannah Gatto; Paul Oh; Martin G Myers
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.