Literature DB >> 34488436

Impact of 30- Versus 60-Second Time Intervals Between Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurements on Measured Blood Pressure.

Stephen P Juraschek1,2, Anthony M Ishak2, Kenneth J Mukamal1, Julia M Wood1, Timothy S Anderson1,2,3, Marc L Cohen1,2, Jonathan X Li1,2, Jennifer L Cluett1,2.   

Abstract

[Figure: see text].

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood pressure; blood pressure monitoring, ambulatory; half protocol; hypertension; wakefulness

Mesh：

Year:  2021        PMID： 34488436      PMCID： PMC8715230          DOI： 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.17876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN： 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  22 in total

1.  Comparison of two automated sphygmomanometers for use in the office setting.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Miguel Valdivieso; Alexander Kiss; Sheldon W Tobe
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.444

2.  Comparison of Automated Office Blood Pressure With Office and Out-Off-Office Measurement Techniques.

Authors:  Marco Pappaccogli; Silvia Di Monaco; Elisa Perlo; Jacopo Burrello; Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Franco Veglio; Silvia Monticone; Franco Rabbia
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  The optimal scheme of self blood pressure measurement as determined from ambulatory blood pressure recordings.

Authors:  Willem J Verberk; Abraham A Kroon; Alfons G H Kessels; Jacques W M Lenders; Theo Thien; Gert A van Montfrans; Andries J Smit; Peter W de Leeuw
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.844

4.  The 2013 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, prevention, and treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  Daniel G Hackam; Robert R Quinn; Pietro Ravani; Doreen M Rabi; Kaberi Dasgupta; Stella S Daskalopoulou; Nadia A Khan; Robert J Herman; Simon L Bacon; Lyne Cloutier; Martin Dawes; Simon W Rabkin; Richard E Gilbert; Marcel Ruzicka; Donald W McKay; Tavis S Campbell; Steven Grover; George Honos; Ernesto L Schiffrin; Peter Bolli; Thomas W Wilson; Ross D Feldman; Patrice Lindsay; Michael D Hill; Mark Gelfer; Kevin D Burns; Michel Vallée; G V Ramesh Prasad; Marcel Lebel; Donna McLean; J Malcolm O Arnold; Gordon W Moe; Jonathan G Howlett; Jean-Martin Boulanger; Pierre Larochelle; Lawrence A Leiter; Charlotte Jones; Richard I Ogilvie; Vincent Woo; Janusz Kaczorowski; Luc Trudeau; Robert J Petrella; Alain Milot; James A Stone; Denis Drouin; Kim L Lavoie; Maxime Lamarre-Cliche; Marshall Godwin; Guy Tremblay; Pavel Hamet; George Fodor; S George Carruthers; George B Pylypchuk; Ellen Burgess; Richard Lewanczuk; George K Dresser; S Brian Penner; Robert A Hegele; Philip A McFarlane; Mukul Sharma; Debra J Reid; Sheldon W Tobe; Luc Poirier; Raj S Padwal
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 5.223

5.  Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  William C Cushman; Gregory W Evans; Robert P Byington; David C Goff; Richard H Grimm; Jeffrey A Cutler; Denise G Simons-Morton; Jan N Basile; Marshall A Corson; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Lois Katz; Kevin A Peterson; William T Friedewald; John B Buse; J Thomas Bigger; Hertzel C Gerstein; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Differences of blood pressure estimates between consecutive measurements on one occasion: implications for inter-study comparability of epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  M B Schulze; A Kroke; M M Bergmann; H Boeing
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering; John E Hall; Lawrence J Appel; Bonita E Falkner; John Graves; Martha N Hill; Daniel W Jones; Theodore Kurtz; Sheldon G Sheps; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Association of Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressure With Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes.

Authors:  Wen-Yi Yang; Jesus D Melgarejo; Lutgarde Thijs; Zhen-Yu Zhang; José Boggia; Fang-Fei Wei; Tine W Hansen; Kei Asayama; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Jørgen Jeppesen; Eamon Dolan; Katarzyna Stolarz-Skrzypek; Sofia Malyutina; Edoardo Casiglia; Lars Lind; Jan Filipovský; Gladys E Maestre; Yan Li; Ji-Guang Wang; Yutaka Imai; Kalina Kawecka-Jaszcz; Edgardo Sandoya; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Eoin O'Brien; Peter Verhamme; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Optimum frequency of office blood pressure measurement using an automated sphygmomanometer.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Miguel Valdivieso; Alexander Kiss
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.444

Review 10.  The optimal use of automated office blood pressure measurement in clinical practice.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Andreadis; Charalampia V Geladari; Epameinondas T Angelopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.738
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.