Literature DB >> 31786829

Automated office blood pressure measurements obtained with and without preceding rest are associated with awake ambulatory blood pressure.

Emmanuel A Andreadis1, Charalampia V Geladari1, Epameinondas T Angelopoulos1.   

Abstract

Automated office blood pressure (AOBP) measurement, attended or unattended, eliminates the white coat effect (WCE) showing a strong association with awake ambulatory blood pressure (ABP). This study examined the difference in AOBP readings, with and without 5 minutes of rest prior to three readings recorded at 1-min intervals. Cross-sectional data from 100 randomized selected hypertensives, 61 men and 39 women, with a mean age of 52.2 ± 10.8 years, 82% treated, were analyzed. The mean systolic AOBP values without preceding rest were 127.0 ± 18.2 mm Hg, and the mean systolic AOBP values with 5 minutes of preceding rest were 125.7 ± 17.9 mm Hg (P = .05). A significant order effect was observed for the mean systolic BP values when AOBP without 5 minutes of preceding rest was performed as the first measurement (130.0 ± 17.7 vs 126.5 ± 16.2, P = .008). When we used a target systolic AOBP ≥ 130 mm Hg, awake ABP yielded lower readings, while at a target systolic AOBP value of < 130 mm Hg higher awake ABP values were obtained. Our findings indicate that systolic AOBP can be initially checked without any preceding rest and if readings are normal can be accepted. Otherwise, when AOBP is ≥ 130 mm Hg, measurements should be rechecked with 5 minutes of rest.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  automated office blood pressure; awake ambulatory blood pressure; preceding rest

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31786829      PMCID: PMC8029968          DOI: 10.1111/jch.13748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  18 in total

1.  Ambulatory blood pressure normality: results from the PAMELA study.

Authors:  G Mancia; R Sega; C Bravi; G De Vito; F Valagussa; G Cesana; A Zanchetti
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.844

2.  Hypertension Canada's 2016 Canadian Hypertension Education Program Guidelines for Blood Pressure Measurement, Diagnosis, Assessment of Risk, Prevention, and Treatment of Hypertension.

Authors:  Alexander A Leung; Kara Nerenberg; Stella S Daskalopoulou; Kerry McBrien; Kelly B Zarnke; Kaberi Dasgupta; Lyne Cloutier; Mark Gelfer; Maxime Lamarre-Cliche; Alain Milot; Peter Bolli; Guy Tremblay; Donna McLean; Sheldon W Tobe; Marcel Ruzicka; Kevin D Burns; Michel Vallée; G V Ramesh Prasad; Marcel Lebel; Ross D Feldman; Peter Selby; Andrew Pipe; Ernesto L Schiffrin; Philip A McFarlane; Paul Oh; Robert A Hegele; Milan Khara; Thomas W Wilson; S Brian Penner; Ellen Burgess; Robert J Herman; Simon L Bacon; Simon W Rabkin; Richard E Gilbert; Tavis S Campbell; Steven Grover; George Honos; Patrice Lindsay; Michael D Hill; Shelagh B Coutts; Gord Gubitz; Norman R C Campbell; Gordon W Moe; Jonathan G Howlett; Jean-Martin Boulanger; Ally Prebtani; Pierre Larochelle; Lawrence A Leiter; Charlotte Jones; Richard I Ogilvie; Vincent Woo; Janusz Kaczorowski; Luc Trudeau; Robert J Petrella; Swapnil Hiremath; Denis Drouin; Kim L Lavoie; Pavel Hamet; George Fodor; Jean C Grégoire; Richard Lewanczuk; George K Dresser; Mukul Sharma; Debra Reid; Scott A Lear; Gregory Moullec; Milan Gupta; Laura A Magee; Alexander G Logan; Kevin C Harris; Janis Dionne; Anne Fournier; Geneviève Benoit; Janusz Feber; Luc Poirier; Raj S Padwal; Doreen M Rabi
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 5.223

3.  Methodology and technology for peripheral and central blood pressure and blood pressure variability measurement: current status and future directions - Position statement of the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on blood pressure monitoring and cardiovascular variability.

Authors:  George S Stergiou; Gianfranco Parati; Charalambos Vlachopoulos; Apostolos Achimastos; Emanouel Andreadis; Roland Asmar; Alberto Avolio; Athanase Benetos; Grzegorz Bilo; Nadia Boubouchairopoulou; Pierre Boutouyrie; Paolo Castiglioni; Alejandro de la Sierra; Eamon Dolan; Geoffrey Head; Yutaka Imai; Kazuomi Kario; Anastasios Kollias; Vasilis Kotsis; Efstathios Manios; Richard McManus; Thomas Mengden; Anastasia Mihailidou; Martin Myers; Teemu Niiranen; Juan Eugenio Ochoa; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Stefano Omboni; Paul Padfield; Paolo Palatini; Theodore Papaioannou; Athanasios Protogerou; Josep Redon; Paolo Verdecchia; Jiguang Wang; Alberto Zanchetti; Giuseppe Mancia; Eoin O'Brien
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.844

4.  A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.

Authors:  Jackson T Wright; Jeff D Williamson; Paul K Whelton; Joni K Snyder; Kaycee M Sink; Michael V Rocco; David M Reboussin; Mahboob Rahman; Suzanne Oparil; Cora E Lewis; Paul L Kimmel; Karen C Johnson; David C Goff; Lawrence J Fine; Jeffrey A Cutler; William C Cushman; Alfred K Cheung; Walter T Ambrosius
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Office blood pressure is lower than awake ambulatory blood pressure at lower targets for treatment.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-09-24       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Response to the Letter to the Editor on "Antecedent rest may not be necessary for automated office blood pressure at lower treatment targets".

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Tracey J F Colella
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Letter to the Editor on "Antecedent rest may not be necessary for automated office blood pressure at lower treatment targets".

Authors:  Raj S Padwal
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 8.  2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Paul K Whelton; Robert M Carey; Wilbert S Aronow; Donald E Casey; Karen J Collins; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb; Sondra M DePalma; Samuel Gidding; Kenneth A Jamerson; Daniel W Jones; Eric J MacLaughlin; Paul Muntner; Bruce Ovbiagele; Sidney C Smith; Crystal C Spencer; Randall S Stafford; Sandra J Taler; Randal J Thomas; Kim A Williams; Jeff D Williamson; Jackson T Wright
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 9.897

9.  Attended and Unattended Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurements Have Better Agreement With Ambulatory Monitoring Than Conventional Office Readings.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Andreadis; Charalampia V Geladari; Epameinondas T Angelopoulos; Florentia S Savva; Anna I Georgantoni; Vasilios Papademetriou
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Automated office blood pressure measurements obtained with and without preceding rest are associated with awake ambulatory blood pressure.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Andreadis; Charalampia V Geladari; Epameinondas T Angelopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  5 in total

1.  Unattended automated office blood pressure measurement: Time efficiency and barriers to implementation/utilization.

Authors:  John Doane; Michael Flynn; Marcus Archibald; Dominick Ramirez; Molly B Conroy; Barry Stults
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 2.  The optimal use of automated office blood pressure measurement in clinical practice.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Andreadis; Charalampia V Geladari; Epameinondas T Angelopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Automated office blood pressure measurements obtained with and without preceding rest are associated with awake ambulatory blood pressure.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Andreadis; Charalampia V Geladari; Epameinondas T Angelopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Automated office blood pressure is in agreement with awake and mean 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure at the lower blood pressure range.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Andreadis; Charalampia V Geladari; Epameinondas T Angelopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Clinical Impact of after-consult clinic blood pressure: comparison with automated office blood pressure.

Authors:  Cheol Ho Lee; Ji Hun Ahn; Joon Ha Ryu; Woong Gil Choi
Journal:  Clin Hypertens       Date:  2021-08-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.