Literature DB >> 27863819

Unfounded concerns about the use of automated office blood pressure measurement in SPRINT.

Martin G Myers1, Norm R C Campbell2.   

Abstract

SPRINT reported significantly fewer cardiovascular events when patients with a higher cardiovascular risk were treated to a target systolic blood pressure (BP) of <120 versus <140 mm Hg. In SPRINT, BP was recorded using the automated office BP (AOBP) method, with multiple readings being taken automatically with the patient resting alone. This technique for BP measurement eliminates the white-coat effect and gives lower BP readings than conventional manual office BP. Critics have questioned if the readings were actually taken with the subject alone and have expressed concerns about the time taken to obtain the readings and the cost of automated sphygmomanometers. Others have suggested that the findings in SPRINT can be applied to current clinical practice if a correction factor is used to convert conventional BP readings to AOBP. This article responds to these criticisms and explains why current methods for recording BP in clinical practice should be changed to AOBP, the technique for BP measurement used in SPRINT.
Copyright © 2016 American Society of Hypertension. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hypertension diagnosis; hypertension treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27863819     DOI: 10.1016/j.jash.2016.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens        ISSN: 1878-7436


  12 in total

Review 1.  Strategies for Achieving Healthy Vascular Aging.

Authors:  Kristen L Nowak; Matthew J Rossman; Michel Chonchol; Douglas R Seals
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 2.  Automated Office-Based Blood Pressure Measurement: an Overview and Guidance for Implementation in Primary Care.

Authors:  Romsai T Boonyasai; Erika L McCannon; Joseph E Landavaso
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 3.  Implementing Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurement.

Authors:  Daniel W Jones
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  Response by Bress et al to Letters Regarding Article, "Potential Deaths Averted and Serious Adverse Events Incurred From Adoption of the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) Intensive Blood Pressure Regimen in the United States: Projections from NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey)".

Authors:  Adam P Bress; Holly Kramer; Richard S Cooper
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Blood Pressure, Sexual Activity, and Erectile Function in Hypertensive Men: Baseline Findings from the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).

Authors:  Capri G Foy; Jill C Newman; Dan R Berlowitz; Laurie P Russell; Paul L Kimmel; Virginia G Wadley; Holly N Thomas; Alan J Lerner; William T Riley
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Impact of 30- Versus 60-Second Time Intervals Between Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurements on Measured Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Stephen P Juraschek; Anthony M Ishak; Kenneth J Mukamal; Julia M Wood; Timothy S Anderson; Marc L Cohen; Jonathan X Li; Jennifer L Cluett
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  Resistant Hypertension: Detection, Evaluation, and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Robert M Carey; David A Calhoun; George L Bakris; Robert D Brook; Stacie L Daugherty; Cheryl R Dennison-Himmelfarb; Brent M Egan; John M Flack; Samuel S Gidding; Eric Judd; Daniel T Lackland; Cheryl L Laffer; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Steven M Smith; Sandra J Taler; Stephen C Textor; Tanya N Turan; William B White
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 8.  The optimal use of automated office blood pressure measurement in clinical practice.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Andreadis; Charalampia V Geladari; Epameinondas T Angelopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Office blood pressure measurement in the 21st century.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Roland Asmar; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Hypertension and blood pressure variability management practices among physicians in Singapore.

Authors:  Sajita Setia; Kannan Subramaniam; Jam Chin Tay; Boon Wee Teo
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2017-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.