Literature DB >> 32068850

Fecal bacterial community of finishing beef steers fed ruminally protected and non-protected active dried yeast.

Tao Ran1,2,3, Peixin Jiao4,5, Ousama AlZahal6, Xiaolai Xie3, Karen A Beauchemin1, Dongyan Niu3, Wenzhu Yang1.   

Abstract

Our previous study suggested that supplementation of high-grain diets with ruminally protected and non-protected active dried yeast (ADY) may potentially reduce manure pathogen excretion by feedlot cattle. We hypothesized that feeding ruminally protected ADY might change the fecal bacterial community of finishing cattle. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of feeding ruminally protected and non-protected ADY to finishing beef steers on their fecal bacterial community. Fresh fecal samples were collected on day 56 from 50 steers fed one of five treatments: 1) control (no monensin, tylosin, or ADY), 2) antibiotics (ANT, 330 mg monensin + 110 mg tylosin·steer-1d-1), 3) ADY (1.5 g·steer-1d-1), 4) encapsulated ADY (EDY; 3 g·steer-1d-1), and 5) a mixture of ADY and EDY (MDY; 1.5 g ADY + 3 g EDY·steer-1d-1). Bacterial DNA was extracted from fecal samples and sequenced using a MiSeq high-throughput sequencing platform. A total number of 2,128,772 high-quality V4 16S rRNA sequences from 50 fecal samples were analyzed, and 1,424 operational taxonomic units (OTU) were detected based on 97% nucleotide sequence identity among reads, with 769 OTU shared across the five treatments. Alpha diversity indices, including species observed, Chao estimate, abundance-based coverage estimator, Shannon, Simpson, and coverage, did not differ among treatments, and principal coordinate analysis revealed a high similarity among treatments without independent distribution. Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes were dominant phyla in the fecal bacterial community for all treatments, with a tendency (P < 0.10) for greater relative abundance of Bacteroidetes but lesser Firmicutes with ANT, EDY, and MDY compared with control steers. Prevotella was the dominant genus in all treatments and steers supplemented with ANT, EDY, and MDY had greater (P < 0.05) relative abundance of Prevotella than control steers, but lesser (P < 0.03) relative abundance of Oscillospira. No differences between ADY and control were observed for the aforementioned variables. Fecal starch contents were not different among treatments, but the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes, as well as Prevotella at genera level, tended (P < 0.06) to be positively correlated to fecal starch content. We conclude that supplementing ruminally protected or non-protected ADY or ANT had no effect on diversity and richness of fecal bacteria of finishing beef cattle, whereas feeding protected ADY or ANT to finishing beef steers altered the dominant fecal bacteria at phylum and genus levels. Therefore, supplementation of ruminally protected ADY may potentially improve intestinal health by stimulating the relative abundance of Prevotella. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  active dried yeast; antibiotics; beef steers; fecal bacterial diversity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32068850      PMCID: PMC7105065          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  28 in total

1.  Animal-to-animal variation in fecal microbial diversity among beef cattle.

Authors:  Lisa M Durso; Gregory P Harhay; Timothy P L Smith; James L Bono; Todd Z Desantis; Dayna M Harhay; Gary L Andersen; James E Keen; William W Laegreid; Michael L Clawson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities.

Authors:  Patrick D Schloss; Sarah L Westcott; Thomas Ryabin; Justine R Hall; Martin Hartmann; Emily B Hollister; Ryan A Lesniewski; Brian B Oakley; Donovan H Parks; Courtney J Robinson; Jason W Sahl; Blaz Stres; Gerhard G Thallinger; David J Van Horn; Carolyn F Weber
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Ruminally protected and unprotected Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation products as alternatives to antibiotics in finishing beef steers1.

Authors:  Yizhao Shen; Taylor Davedow; Tao Ran; Atef M Saleem; Ilkyu Yoon; Claudia Narvaez; Tim Angus Mcallister; Wenzhu Yang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Excretion and tissue distribution of [14C]monensin in cattle.

Authors:  R Herberg; J Manthey; L Richardson; C Cooley; A Donoho
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  1978 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.279

5.  Factors influencing ruminal bacterial community diversity and composition and microbial fibrolytic enzyme abundance in lactating dairy cows with a focus on the role of active dry yeast.

Authors:  Ousama AlZahal; Fuyong Li; Le Luo Guan; Nicola D Walker; Brian W McBride
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Effect of dietary monensin on the bacterial population structure of dairy cattle colonic contents.

Authors:  Jeffery A McGarvey; Scott W Hamilton; Edward J DePeters; Frank M Mitloehner
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Ecology of uncultivated Oscillospira species in the rumen of cattle, sheep, and reindeer as assessed by microscopy and molecular approaches.

Authors:  Roderick I Mackie; Rustam I Aminov; Wenping Hu; Athol V Klieve; Diane Ouwerkerk; Monica A Sundset; Yoichi Kamagata
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data.

Authors:  J Gregory Caporaso; Justin Kuczynski; Jesse Stombaugh; Kyle Bittinger; Frederic D Bushman; Elizabeth K Costello; Noah Fierer; Antonio Gonzalez Peña; Julia K Goodrich; Jeffrey I Gordon; Gavin A Huttley; Scott T Kelley; Dan Knights; Jeremy E Koenig; Ruth E Ley; Catherine A Lozupone; Daniel McDonald; Brian D Muegge; Meg Pirrung; Jens Reeder; Joel R Sevinsky; Peter J Turnbaugh; William A Walters; Jeremy Widmann; Tanya Yatsunenko; Jesse Zaneveld; Rob Knight
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-04-11       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Influence of wet distillers grains diets on beef cattle fecal bacterial community structure.

Authors:  William C Rice; Michael L Galyean; Stephen B Cox; Scot E Dowd; N Andy Cole
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Effect of antimicrobial growth promoter administration on the intestinal microbiota of beef cattle.

Authors:  Kristen L Reti; Matthew C Thomas; L Jay Yanke; L Brent Selinger; G Douglas Inglis
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 4.181

View more
  2 in total

1.  Assessing the statistical training in animal science graduate programs in the United States: survey on statistical training.

Authors:  Nick V L Serão; Amy L Petry; Leticia P Sanglard; Mariana C Rossoni-Serão; Jennifer M Bundy
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  The Temporal Dynamics of Rumen Microbiota in Early Weaned Lambs.

Authors:  Shiqin Wang; Jianmin Chai; Guohong Zhao; Naifeng Zhang; Kai Cui; Yanliang Bi; Tao Ma; Yan Tu; Qiyu Diao
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-01-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.