| Literature DB >> 35056593 |
Shiqin Wang1,2, Jianmin Chai1,3, Guohong Zhao1,2, Naifeng Zhang1, Kai Cui1, Yanliang Bi1, Tao Ma1, Yan Tu1, Qiyu Diao1.
Abstract
Weaning affects the development of ruminal bacteria in lambs during early life. However, the temporal dynamics of rumen microbiota in early weaned lambs is unknown compared to conventionally weaned lambs. In this study, one group was reared with their dams (control, CON) and conventionally weaned at 49 days (d), while the other lambs were weaned at 21 d (early weaning, EW) using starter. Rumen microbial samples collected at 26, 35, and 63 d were used for next-generation sequencing. Here, we found that the abundance and diversity of rumen microbiota in EW were significantly lower at 26 and 35 d than the CON. Linear discriminant analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) analysis was performed to identify the signature microbiota for EW at these three ages. At 26 d, Prevotella 7, Syntrophococcus, Sharpea, Dialister, Pseudoscardovia, and Megasphaera in the rumen of the EW group had greater relative abundances. At 35 d, the Lachnospiraceae_NK3A20_group was enriched in CON. On 63 d, Erysipelotrichaceae_UCG-002 was abundant in EW. Syntrophococcus and Megaspheaera in EW lambs were abundant at 26 and 35 d, but kept similar to CON at 63 d. The relative abundance of Erysipelotrichaceae_UCG-002 at all-time points was consistently higher in the EW group. In conclusion, early weaning led to a significant decrease in rumen microbiota richness and diversity in the short term. The changes in rumen microbiota are associated with the persistence of weaning stress. The temporal dynamics of relative abundances of Syntrophococcus, Megasphaera, and Ruminococcaceae_UCG-014 reflect the weaning stress over a short period and rumen recovery after early weaning.Entities:
Keywords: early weaning; lamb; rumen development; rumen maturation; rumen microbiota; solid diet; weaning stress
Year: 2022 PMID: 35056593 PMCID: PMC8779368 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10010144
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Figure 1Alpha diversity and similarity of rumen microbiota in control (CON) and early weaned (EW) lambs at 26, 35, and 63 days of age (d). (A,B): Alpha diversity in the rumen microbial community based on the Shannon index and observed species; (C,D): The principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on the unweighted and weighted Unifrac distances. Each point represents a unique sample. CON26 = control at 26 d; EW = early weaning group at 26 d, the rest can be deduced by analogy.
Figure 2The composition of rumen microbiome at phylum and genus level. (A): The composition of rumen microbiome at phylum level; (B): The composition of major rumen genera. CON26 = control at 26 d; EW = early weaning group at 26 d. The rest can be deduced by analogy.
Figure 3LEfSe analyses of rumen microbiota. LEfSe identified significantly different bacteria at the genus level as differentiating the two groups (control (CON) and early weaned (EW)) at 26 d (A), 35 d (B) and 63 d (C). Genera in this graph were statistically significant (p < 0.05) and had an LDA Score > 2.5, which was considered a significant effect size.
Figure 4Temporal dynamics of the bacterial biomarkers for lambs changed with ages. The important bacterial biomarkers, including Syntrophococcus (A), Megasphaera (B), Ruminococcaceae_UCG-014 (C) and Erysipelotrichaceae UCG-002 (D), showed different patterns of temporal dynamics in control (CON) and early weaned (EW) groups. CON26 = control at 26 d; EW = early weaning group at 26 d. The rest can be deduced by analogy.
Figure 5Spearman correlation analysis of ruminal microbiota and rumen fermentation parameters. Color represents the correlation coefficient, with red representing a positive correlation and blue denoting a negative correlation. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01.