Literature DB >> 19784643

Effect of dietary monensin on the bacterial population structure of dairy cattle colonic contents.

Jeffery A McGarvey1, Scott W Hamilton, Edward J DePeters, Frank M Mitloehner.   

Abstract

To determine the effect of monensin, a carboxylic polyether ionophore antibiotic, on the bacterial population structure of dairy cattle colonic contents, we fed six lactating Holstein cows a diet containing monensin (600 mg day(-1)) or an identical diet without monensin. Fresh waste samples were taken directly from the animals once a month for 3 months and assayed for their bacterial population structure via 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. In total 6,912 16S rRNA genes were examined, comprising 345 and 315 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) from the monensin fed and control animals, respectively. Coverage estimates of the OTUs identified were 87.6% for the monensin fed and 88.3% for the control colonic content derived library. Despite this high level of coverage, no significant difference was found between the libraries down to the genus level. Thus we concluded that although monensin is believed to increase milk production in dairy cattle by altering the bacterial population structure within the bovine gastrointestinal tract, we were unable to identify any significant difference in the bacterial population structure of the colonic contents of monensin fed vs. the control dairy cattle, down to the genus level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19784643     DOI: 10.1007/s00253-009-2229-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


  10 in total

1.  Animal-to-animal variation in fecal microbial diversity among beef cattle.

Authors:  Lisa M Durso; Gregory P Harhay; Timothy P L Smith; James L Bono; Todd Z Desantis; Dayna M Harhay; Gary L Andersen; James E Keen; William W Laegreid; Michael L Clawson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Fecal bacterial community of finishing beef steers fed ruminally protected and non-protected active dried yeast.

Authors:  Tao Ran; Peixin Jiao; Ousama AlZahal; Xiaolai Xie; Karen A Beauchemin; Dongyan Niu; Wenzhu Yang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Community structures of fecal bacteria in cattle from different animal feeding operations.

Authors:  Orin C Shanks; Catherine A Kelty; Shawn Archibeque; Michael Jenkins; Ryan J Newton; Sandra L McLellan; Susan M Huse; Mitchell L Sogin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Bacterial communities in aerosols and manure samples from two different dairies in central and Sonoma valleys of California.

Authors:  Subbarao V Ravva; Chester Z Sarreal; Robert E Mandrell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Influence of wet distillers grains diets on beef cattle fecal bacterial community structure.

Authors:  William C Rice; Michael L Galyean; Stephen B Cox; Scot E Dowd; N Andy Cole
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 3.605

6.  Pyrosequencing reveals diverse fecal microbiota in Simmental calves during early development.

Authors:  Daniela Klein-Jöbstl; Elisa Schornsteiner; Evelyne Mann; Martin Wagner; Marc Drillich; Stephan Schmitz-Esser
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Metagenomic characterization of the effect of feed additives on the gut microbiome and antibiotic resistome of feedlot cattle.

Authors:  Milton Thomas; Megan Webb; Sudeep Ghimire; Amanda Blair; Kenneth Olson; Gavin John Fenske; Alex Thomas Fonder; Jane Christopher-Hennings; Derek Brake; Joy Scaria
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Dosage-dependent effects of monensin on the rumen microbiota of lactating dairy cattle.

Authors:  Jeffery A McGarvey; Sara Place; Jeffrey Palumbo; Robert Hnasko; Frank Mitloehner
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Comparison of changes in fecal microbiota of calves with and without dam.

Authors:  Mengya Li; Zhisheng Wang; Lizhi Wang; Bai Xue; Rui Hu; Huawei Zou; Siqiang Liu; Ali Mujtaba Shah; Quanhui Peng
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Effect of antimicrobial growth promoter administration on the intestinal microbiota of beef cattle.

Authors:  Kristen L Reti; Matthew C Thomas; L Jay Yanke; L Brent Selinger; G Douglas Inglis
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 4.181

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.