Literature DB >> 28390722

Factors influencing ruminal bacterial community diversity and composition and microbial fibrolytic enzyme abundance in lactating dairy cows with a focus on the role of active dry yeast.

Ousama AlZahal1, Fuyong Li2, Le Luo Guan2, Nicola D Walker3, Brian W McBride4.   

Abstract

The objective of the current study was to employ a DNA-based sequencing technology to study the effect of active dry yeast (ADY) supplementation, diet type, and sample location within the rumen on rumen bacterial community diversity and composition, and to use an RNA-based method to study the effect of ADY supplementation on rumen microbial metabolism during high-grain feeding (HG). Our previous report demonstrated that the supplementation of lactating dairy cows with ADY attenuated the effect of subacute ruminal acidosis. Therefore, we used samples from that study, where 16 multiparous, rumen-cannulated lactating Holstein cows were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 dietary treatments: ADY (Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain Y1242, 80 billion cfu/animal per day) or control (carrier only). Cows received a high-forage diet (77:23, forage:concentrate), then were abruptly switched to HG (49:51, forage:concentrate). Rumen bacterial community diversity and structure were highly influenced by diet and sampling location (fluid, solids, epimural). The transition to HG reduced bacterial diversity, but epimural bacteria maintained a greater diversity than fluid and solids. Analysis of molecular variance indicated a significant separation due to diet × sampling location, but not due to treatment. Across all samples, the analysis yielded 6,254 nonsingleton operational taxonomic units (OTU), which were classified into several phyla: mainly Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Fibrobacteres, Tenericutes, and Proteobacteria. High forage and solids were dominated by OTU from Fibrobacter, whereas HG and fluid were dominated by OTU from Prevotella. Epimural samples, however, were dominated in part by Campylobacter. Active dry yeast had no effect on bacterial community diversity or structure. The phylum SR1 was more abundant in all ADY samples regardless of diet or sampling location. Furthermore, on HG, OTU2 and OTU3 (both classified into Fibrobacter succinogenes) were more abundant with ADY in fluid and solids than control samples. This increase with ADY was paralleled by a reduction in prominent Prevotella OTU. Metatranscriptomic profiling of rumen microbiome conducted on random samples from the HG phase showed that ADY increased the abundance of the cellulase endo-β-1,4-glucanase and had a tendency to increase the hemicellulase α-glucuronidase. In conclusion, the shift from high forage to HG and sampling location had a more significant influence on ruminal bacterial community abundance and structure compared with ADY. However, evidence suggested that ADY can increase the abundance of some dominant anaerobic OTU belonging to F. succinogenes and phylum SR1. Further, microbial mRNA-based evidence suggested that ADY can increase the abundance of a specific microbial fibrolytic enzymes. The Authors. Published by the Federation of Animal Science Societies and Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).

Entities:  

Keywords:  active dry yeast; dairy cow; metatranscriptome; rumen microbiome; subacute ruminal acidosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28390722     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-11473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  20 in total

1.  Zinc AA supplementation alters yearling ram rumen bacterial communities but zinc sulfate supplementation does not.

Authors:  Suzanne L Ishaq; Chad M Page; Carl J Yeoman; Thomas W Murphy; Megan L Van Emon; Whit C Stewart
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Dietary Supplementation with Sodium Sulfate Improves Rumen Fermentation, Fiber Digestibility, and the Plasma Metabolome through Modulation of Rumen Bacterial Communities in Steers.

Authors:  Yuchao Zhao; Biao Xie; Jian Gao; Guangyong Zhao
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Effect of cattle breed and basal diet on digestibility, rumen bacterial communities, and eating and rumination activity.

Authors:  Pedro H V Carvalho; Ana C J Pinto; Danilo D Millen; Tara L Felix
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Fecal bacterial community of finishing beef steers fed ruminally protected and non-protected active dried yeast.

Authors:  Tao Ran; Peixin Jiao; Ousama AlZahal; Xiaolai Xie; Karen A Beauchemin; Dongyan Niu; Wenzhu Yang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Variation in animal performance explained by the rumen microbiome or by diet composition.

Authors:  Claire B Gleason; Robin R White
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  The use of live yeast to increase intake and performance of cattle receiving low-quality tropical forages.

Authors:  Mariano C Parra; Diogo F A Costa; Andre S V Palma; Karine D V Camargo; Lais O Lima; Karen J Harper; Sarah J Meale; Luis F P Silva
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  An Investigation into Rumen Fungal and Protozoal Diversity in Three Rumen Fractions, during High-Fiber or Grain-Induced Sub-Acute Ruminal Acidosis Conditions, with or without Active Dry Yeast Supplementation.

Authors:  Suzanne L Ishaq; Ousama AlZahal; Nicola Walker; Brian McBride
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Disentangling the Complexity of the Rumen Microbial Diversity Through Fractionation Using a Sucrose Density Gradient.

Authors:  Ruth Hernández; Hugo Jimenez; Cesar Vargas-Garcia; Alejandro Caro-Quintero; Alejandro Reyes
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  16S rRNA Sequencing Reveals Relationship Between Potent Cellulolytic Genera and Feed Efficiency in the Rumen of Bulls.

Authors:  Emily McGovern; David A Kenny; Matthew S McCabe; Claire Fitzsimons; Mark McGee; Alan K Kelly; Sinéad M Waters
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Comparative metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses reveal the breed effect on the rumen microbiome and its associations with feed efficiency in beef cattle.

Authors:  Fuyong Li; Thomas C A Hitch; Yanhong Chen; Christopher J Creevey; Le Luo Guan
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 14.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.