Literature DB >> 32047987

Evaluation of self-calibrated non-linear phase-contrast correction in pediatric and congenital cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Erin A Paul1, Ana Beatriz Solana2, Jimmy Duong3, Amee M Shah4, Wyman W Lai5, Ek T Tan6, Christopher J Hardy6, Anjali Chelliah4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The need for background error correction in phase-contrast flow analysis has historically posed a challenge in cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. While previous studies have shown that phantom correction improves flow measurements, it impedes scanner workflow.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of self-calibrated non-linear phase-contrast correction on flows in pediatric and congenital cardiac MR compared to phantom correction as the standard.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified children who had great-vessel phase-contrast and static phantom sequences acquired between January 2015 and June 2015. We applied a novel correction method to each phase-contrast sequence post hoc. Uncorrected, non-linear, and phantom-corrected flows were compared using intraclass correlation. We used paired t-tests to compare how closely non-linear and uncorrected flows approximated phantom-corrected flows. In children without intra- or extracardiac shunts or significant semilunar valvular regurgitation, we used paired t-tests to compare how closely the uncorrected pulmonary-to-systemic flow ratio (Qp:Qs) and non-linear Qp:Qs approximated phantom-corrected Qp:Qs.
RESULTS: We included 211 diagnostic-quality phase-contrast sequences (93 aorta, 74 main pulmonary artery [MPA], 21 left pulmonary artery [LPA], 23 right pulmonary artery [RPA]) from 108 children (median age 15 years, interquartile range 11-18 years). Intraclass correlation showed strong agreement between non-linear and phantom-corrected flow measurements but also between uncorrected and phantom-corrected flow measurements. Non-linear flow measurements did not more closely approximate phantom-corrected measurements than did uncorrected measurements for any vessel. In 39 children without significant shunting or regurgitation, mean non-linear Qp:Qs (1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01, 1.13) was no closer than mean uncorrected Qp:Qs (1.06; 95% CI = 1.00, 1.13) to mean phantom-corrected Qp:Qs (1.02; 95% CI = 0.98, 1.06).
CONCLUSION: Despite strong agreement between self-calibrated non-linear and phantom correction, cardiac flows and shunt calculations with non-linear correction were no closer to phantom-corrected measurements than those without background correction. However, phantom-corrected flows also demonstrated minimal differences from uncorrected flows. These findings suggest that in the current era, more accurate phase-contrast flow measurements might limit the need for background correction. Further investigation of the clinical impact and optimal methods of background correction in the pediatric and congenital cardiac population is needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Background correction; Congenital heart disease; Heart; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pediatric; Phantom; Phase contrast

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32047987     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-020-04623-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  16 in total

Review 1.  Flow measurement by magnetic resonance: a unique asset worth optimising.

Authors:  Philip J Kilner; Peter D Gatehouse; David N Firmin
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.364

2.  Analysis and correction of background velocity offsets in phase-contrast flow measurements using magnetic field monitoring.

Authors:  Daniel Giese; Maximilian Haeberlin; Christoph Barmet; Klaas P Pruessmann; Tobias Schaeffter; Sebastian Kozerke
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Concomitant gradient terms in phase contrast MR: analysis and correction.

Authors:  M A Bernstein; X J Zhou; J A Polzin; K F King; A Ganin; N J Pelc; G H Glover
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Baseline correction does not improve flow quantification in phase-contrast velocity measurement for routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Christian Meierhofer; Christine Lyko; Eike Philipp Schneider; Heiko Stern; Stefan Martinoff; John Hess; Sohrab Fratz
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 1.605

5.  Semiautomated method for noise reduction and background phase error correction in MR phase velocity data.

Authors:  P G Walker; G B Cranney; M B Scheidegger; G Waseleski; G M Pohost; A P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Improved accuracy in flow mapping of congenital heart disease using stationary phantom technique.

Authors:  Thomas A Miller; Andrew B Landes; Adrian M Moran
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 5.364

7.  Baseline correction of phase-contrast images in congenital cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Brian J Holland; Beth F Printz; Wyman W Lai
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Analysis of an automated background correction method for cardiovascular MR phase contrast imaging in children and young adults.

Authors:  Cynthia K Rigsby; Nicholas Hilpipre; Gary R McNeal; Gang Zhang; Emma E Boylan; Andrada R Popescu; Grace Choi; Andreas Greiser; Jie Deng
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-12-05

9.  Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements.

Authors:  Peter D Gatehouse; Marijn P Rolf; Martin J Graves; Mark Bm Hofman; John Totman; Beat Werner; Rebecca A Quest; Yingmin Liu; Jochen von Spiczak; Matthias Dieringer; David N Firmin; Albert van Rossum; Massimo Lombardi; Juerg Schwitter; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Philip J Kilner
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging.

Authors:  Krishna S Nayak; Jon-Fredrik Nielsen; Matt A Bernstein; Michael Markl; Peter D Gatehouse; Rene M Botnar; David Saloner; Christine Lorenz; Han Wen; Bob S Hu; Frederick H Epstein; John N Oshinski; Subha V Raman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.