Literature DB >> 21826731

Analysis and correction of background velocity offsets in phase-contrast flow measurements using magnetic field monitoring.

Daniel Giese1, Maximilian Haeberlin, Christoph Barmet, Klaas P Pruessmann, Tobias Schaeffter, Sebastian Kozerke.   

Abstract

The value of phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging for quantifying tissue motion and blood flow has been long recognized. However, the sensitivity of the method to system imperfections can lead to inaccuracies limiting its clinical acceptance. A key source of error relates to eddy current-induced phase fluctuations, which can offset the measured object velocity significantly. A higher-order dynamic field camera was used to study the spatiotemporal evolution of background phases in cine phase-contrast measurements. It is demonstrated that eddy current-induced offsets in phase-difference data are present up to the second spatial order. Oscillatory temporal behaviors of offsets in the kHz range suggest mechanical resonances of the MR system to be non-negligible in phase-contrast imaging. By careful selection of the echo time, their impact can be significantly reduced. When applying field monitoring data for correcting eddy current and mechanically induced velocity offsets, errors decrease to less than 0.5% of the maximum velocity for various sequence settings proving the robustness of the correction approach. In vivo feasibility is demonstrated for aortic and pulmonary flow measurements in five healthy subjects. Using field monitoring data, mean error in stroke volume was reduced from 10% to below 3%.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21826731     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.23111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  20 in total

1.  Cardiac index after acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction measured with phase-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Gert Klug; Sebastian Johannes Reinstadler; Hans-Josef Feistritzer; Christian Kremser; Johannes P Schwaiger; Martin Reindl; Johannes Mair; Silvana Müller; Agnes Mayr; Wolfgang-Michael Franz; Bernhard Metzler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Volumetric velocity measurements in restricted geometries using spiral sampling: a phantom study.

Authors:  Anders Nilsson; Johan Revstedt; Einar Heiberg; Freddy Ståhlberg; Karin Markenroth Bloch
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Evaluation of self-calibrated non-linear phase-contrast correction in pediatric and congenital cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Erin A Paul; Ana Beatriz Solana; Jimmy Duong; Amee M Shah; Wyman W Lai; Ek T Tan; Christopher J Hardy; Anjali Chelliah
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2020-02-11

4.  Limits to flow detection in phase contrast MRI.

Authors:  Nathan H Williamson; Michal E Komlosh; Dan Benjamini; Peter J Basser
Journal:  J Magn Reson Open       Date:  2020-07-22

5.  Comparison of radial 4D Flow-MRI with perivascular ultrasound to quantify blood flow in the abdomen and introduction of a porcine model of pre-hepatic portal hypertension.

Authors:  A Frydrychowicz; A Roldan-Alzate; E Winslow; D Consigny; C A Campo; U Motosugi; K M Johnson; O Wieben; S B Reeder
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging technology-bridging the gap between noninvasive human imaging and optical microscopy.

Authors:  Jonathan R Polimeni; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 7.  Advanced flow MRI: emerging techniques and applications.

Authors:  M Markl; S Schnell; C Wu; E Bollache; K Jarvis; A J Barker; J D Robinson; C K Rigsby
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.350

8.  Accuracy of 4D Flow Measurement of Cerebrospinal Fluid Dynamics in the Cervical Spine: An In Vitro Verification Against Numerical Simulation.

Authors:  Soroush Heidari Pahlavian; Alexander C Bunck; Suraj Thyagaraj; Daniel Giese; Francis Loth; Dennis M Hedderich; Jan Robert Kröger; Bryn A Martin
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  An MRI-based switched gradient impulse response characterization method with uniform eigenmode excitation.

Authors:  Kulam Najmudeen Magdoom; Malisa Sarntinoranont; Thomas H Mareci
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 2.229

10.  A multi-center inter-manufacturer study of the temporal stability of phase-contrast velocity mapping background offset errors.

Authors:  Peter D Gatehouse; Marijn P Rolf; Karin Markenroth Bloch; Martin J Graves; Philip J Kilner; David N Firmin; Mark B M Hofman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-10-20       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.