Literature DB >> 17613655

Flow measurement by magnetic resonance: a unique asset worth optimising.

Philip J Kilner1, Peter D Gatehouse, David N Firmin.   

Abstract

Users and manufacturers of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) systems have, potentially, an unrivalled asset. Phase contrast mapping of velocities through planes transecting the great arteries should provide the most accurate measurements available of cardiac output, shunt flow, aortic or pulmonary regurgitation and, indirectly, of mitral regurgitation. But the reality is that phase contrast velocity mapping remains under-used, and may have become discredited in the eyes of some CMR users and referring clinicians. Even when appropriate methods of acquisition have been used, there can be inaccuracies of flow measurement on some CMR systems caused by background phase errors due to eddy currents or uncorrected concomitant gradients. Measurements of regurgitant or shunt flow can be seriously affected by these errors which should be minimised or corrected by appropriate hardware and software design. If they have not been, inaccuracies can be detected and corrected by repeating identical velocity acquisitions on a static phantom, and subtracting the corresponding apparent phantom velocities from those of the clinical acquisition. For accurate measurements of aortic regurgitation or mitral inflow, motion tracking and velocity correction with respect to the cyclic displacements of the valves are needed, but few if any commercial systems provide this facility. Measurements of jet velocity pose different challenges, mainly related to the size and placement of voxels relative to a narrow jet. Awareness of the potential problems and concerted efforts towards optimisation are needed from manufacturers and users to make appropriate use of phase contrast flow measurement - a unique strength of cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17613655     DOI: 10.1080/10976640701465090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson        ISSN: 1097-6647            Impact factor:   5.364


  62 in total

1.  Effect of protocol choice on phase contrast cardiac magnetic resonance flow measurement in the ascending aorta: breath-hold and non-breath-hold.

Authors:  Michael A Bolen; Randolph M Setser; Ruvin S Gabriel; Rahul D Renapurkar; Yasmeen Tandon; Michael L Lieber; Milind Y Desai; Scott D Flamm
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Imaging congenital heart disease in adults.

Authors:  P J Kilner
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Cardiac index after acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction measured with phase-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Gert Klug; Sebastian Johannes Reinstadler; Hans-Josef Feistritzer; Christian Kremser; Johannes P Schwaiger; Martin Reindl; Johannes Mair; Silvana Müller; Agnes Mayr; Wolfgang-Michael Franz; Bernhard Metzler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Cardiac magnetic resonance before and after percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation.

Authors:  Francesco Secchi; Elda Chiara Resta; Luciane Piazza; Gianfranco Butera; Giovanni Di Leo; Mario Carminati; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Calculations of cardiovascular shunts and regurgitation using magnetic resonance ventricular volume and aortic and pulmonary flow measurements.

Authors:  Daniel G H Devos; Philip J Kilner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Mitral regurgitation quantification by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a comparison of indirect quantification methods.

Authors:  Christian L Polte; Odd Bech-Hanssen; Åse A Johnsson; Sinsia A Gao; Kerstin M Lagerstrand
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Dampening of blood-flow pulsatility along the carotid siphon: does form follow function?

Authors:  T Schubert; F Santini; A F Stalder; J Bock; S Meckel; L Bonati; M Markl; S Wetzel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Improved accuracy in flow mapping of congenital heart disease using stationary phantom technique.

Authors:  Thomas A Miller; Andrew B Landes; Adrian M Moran
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 9.  Towards comprehensive assessment of mitral regurgitation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  K M John Chan; Ricardo Wage; Karen Symmonds; Shelley Rahman-Haley; Raad H Mohiaddin; David N Firmin; John R Pepper; Dudley J Pennell; Philip J Kilner
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults with congenital heart disease from the respective working groups of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Philip J Kilner; Tal Geva; Harald Kaemmerer; Pedro T Trindade; Juerg Schwitter; Gary D Webb
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.