| Literature DB >> 32028722 |
Vilma Pérez1,2, Johanna Cortés1,3, Francisca Marchant3, Cristina Dorador3,4, Verónica Molina5, Marcela Cornejo-D'Ottone6, Klaudia Hernández7, Wade Jeffrey8, Sergio Barahona4,9, Martha B Hengst1,3.
Abstract
Hydrothermal systems are ideal to understand how microbial communities cope with challenging conditions. Lirima, our study site, is a polyextreme, high-altitude, hydrothermal ecosystem located in the Chilean Andean highlands. Herein, we analyze the benthic communities of three nearby springs in a gradient of temperature (42-72 °C represented by stations P42, P53, and P72) and pH, and we characterize their microbial diversity by using bacteria 16S rRNA (V4) gene metabarcoding and 16S rRNA gene clone libraries (bacteria and archaea). Bacterial clone libraries of P42 and P53 springs showed that the community composition was mainly represented by phototrophic bacteria (Chlorobia, 3%, Cyanobacteria 3%, at P42; Chlorobia 5%, and Chloroflexi 5% at P53), Firmicutes (32% at P42 and 43% at P53) and Gammaproteobacteria (13% at P42 and 29% at P53). Furthermore, bacterial communities that were analyzed by 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding were characterized by an overall predominance of Chloroflexi in springs with lower temperatures (33% at P42), followed by Firmicutes in hotter springs (50% at P72). The archaeal diversity of P42 and P53 were represented by taxa belonging to Crenarchaeota, Diapherotrites, Nanoarchaeota, Hadesarchaeota, Thaumarchaeota, and Euryarchaeota. The microbial diversity of the Lirima hydrothermal system is represented by groups from deep branches of the tree of life, suggesting this ecosystem as a reservoir of primitive life and a key system to study the processes that shaped the evolution of the biosphere.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA; Lirima; NGS; archaea; microbial diversity; terrestrial hydrothermal systems; thermophiles
Year: 2020 PMID: 32028722 PMCID: PMC7074759 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8020208
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Figure 1Lirima hydrothermal system. Map of Chile that displays the location of the Lirima hydrothermal system and the spatial distribution of the hot springs (P42, P53A, P53B, P53C, and P72).
Physicochemical parameters of the Lirima hot springs.
| Physicochemical Parameters | Sampling Year | P42 | P53A | P53B | P53C | P72 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature (°C) | 2011 | 45 | 51 | 51 | 51 | ND |
| 2013 | 42 | 48 | 48 | 53 | 72 | |
| pH | 2011 | 7.92 | 7.6 | 7.6 | 7.6 | ND |
| 2013 | 7.8 | 7.2 | 7.2 | 7.2 | 5.2 | |
| Conductivity (µS/cm) | 2011 | 2520 | 2100 | 2100 | 2100 | ND |
| 2013 | 1837 | 1875 | 1875 | 1875 | 1848 | |
| Salinity (psu) | 2011 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ND |
| 2013 | 0.89 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.86 | |
| Redox potential (mV) | 2013’ | −152.4 | −246.7 | −246.7 | −246.7 | −316.9 |
| Type of Soil | Mat | Mat | Sediment | Sediment | Sediment | |
| Altitude (m a.s.l.) | 4016 | 4016 | 4016 | 4016 | 4,016 | |
| GPS coordinates | 19°51′7.75″S; 68°54′24.20″W | 19°51′7.75″S; 68°54′24.20″W | 19°51′7.75″S; 68°54′24.20″W | 19°51′7.75″S; 68°54′24.20″W | 19°51′5.69″S; 68°54′23.57″W |
Genera described as aerobic, anaerobic thermophilic, thermotolerant, acidophilic and or acidotolerant of the Lirima hot springs.
| Characteristics1 | Genus | Phylum | Metabarcoding2 | Clones2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P42 | P53A | P53B | P53C | P72 | P42 | P53 | |||
|
| Acidobacteria | ||||||||
|
| Acidobacteria | ||||||||
| Actinomyces | Actinobacteria | ||||||||
| Chthonomonadales | Armatimonadetes | ||||||||
| Candidatus | Atribacteria | ||||||||
| Fervidibacteria | Bacteroidetes | ||||||||
| GBChlB | Bacteroidetes | ||||||||
|
| Bacteroidetes | ||||||||
|
| Caldiserica | ||||||||
|
| Chloroflexi | ||||||||
|
| Chloroflexi | ||||||||
|
| Chloroflexi | ||||||||
|
| Chloroflexi | ||||||||
|
| Deinococcus–Thermus | ||||||||
|
| Firmicutes | ||||||||
|
| Firmicutes | ||||||||
|
| Firmicutes | ||||||||
|
| Firmicutes | ||||||||
|
| Firmicutes | ||||||||
|
| Firmicutes | ||||||||
| Halanaerobium | Firmicutes | ||||||||
|
|
| Firmicutes | |||||||
|
| Firmicutes | ||||||||
|
| Firmicutes | ||||||||
|
| Firmicutes | ||||||||
|
| Firmicutes | ||||||||
|
| Firmicutes | ||||||||
| Thermodesulfitimonas | Firmicutes | ||||||||
|
| Firmicutes | ||||||||
|
| Planctomycetes | ||||||||
|
| Proteobacteria | ||||||||
|
| Proteobacteria | ||||||||
|
| Proteobacteria | ||||||||
|
| Proteobacteria | ||||||||
|
| Proteobacteria | ||||||||
|
| Proteobacteria | ||||||||
|
| Proteobacteria | ||||||||
|
|
| Proteobacteria | |||||||
|
| Spirochaetae | ||||||||
| Treponema | Spirochaetae | ||||||||
|
| Thermotogae | ||||||||
| DEV007 | Verrucomicrobia | ||||||||
1 Symbols representing each characteristic; 2 Relative abundance color code; Anaerobic; ◯ Aerobic; ◯ Facultative anaerobic; ■ Thermophilic; ☐ Thermotolerant; ☑ Hyperthermophilic; ♦ Acidophilic; ❖ Acidotolerant; and Spore former; Highlight in blue: <0.1%; Highlight in yellow: 0.1–1%; Highlight in bright green: >0.1%.
Figure 2Relative abundance of the 16S rRNA gene clonal analysis that was classified at the phylum level of the microbial community structure from the hot springs at the Lirima hydrothermal system. (A) Bacterial diversity of the P42 and P53 springs. (B) Archaeal diversity of the P42 and P53 springs.
Figure 3Relative abundance of the 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding analysis that was classified at the phylum level of the microbial community structure from the hot springs at the Lirima hydrothermal system. (A) Bacterial diversity of the P42, P53A, P53B, P53C and P72 springs. (B) Rare bacterial diversity of the P42, P53A, P53B and P53C springs. (C) Semi-rare bacterial diversity of the P42, P53A, P53B, P53C and P72 springs. (D) Abundant bacterial diversity of the P42, P53A, P53B, P53C and P72 springs.
Figure 4Redundancy analysis (RDA) ordination plot that illustrates the relations between the Lirima hot springs’ microbial community composition (red) and the environmental variables that explain most of the variance (black) in each of the springs (blue circles). The grey rectangle in the first plot (above) is represented in the second plot (below) with the ordination of the species with less abundance. The ordination of the species in the second plot was rearranged when plotted to accomplish a better resolution.
Figure 5Scanning electron microscopy micrographs from enrichment cultures of hot springs. (A) P42, (B), P53A, (C), P53B, (D) P53C, and (E) P72.
Figure 6Molecular phylogenetic analysis of early life genera. The evolutionary history was inferred by using maximum likelihood method based on the Tamura–Nei model with one hundred bootstraps to assign confidence levels to the nodes of the trees, (MEGA version 7.0.26).