| Literature DB >> 27832517 |
Amrita Kumari Panda1, Satpal Singh Bisht2, Surajit De Mandal3, Nachimuthu Senthil Kumar3.
Abstract
Bacterial and archaeal diversity of two alkaline Indian hot springs, Jakrem (Meghalaya) and Yumthang (Sikkim), were studied. Thirteen major bacterial phyla were identified of which Firmicutes, Chloroflexi and Thermi were dominant in Jakrem and Proteobacteria in Yumthang. The dominant genera were Clostridium, Chloroflexus and Meiothermus at Jakrem (water temperature 46 °C, pH 9) and Thiobacillus, Sulfuritalea at Yumthang (water temperature 39 °C, pH 8) hot springs. The four Euryarchaeota taxa that were observed in both the hot springs were Methanoculleus, Methanosaeta, Methanosarcina and Methanocorposculum. Elstera litoralis, Thiovirga sp., Turneriella sp. were observed for the first time in association with hot springs along with Tepidibacter sp., Ignavibacterium sp., Teribacillus sp. and Dechloromonas sp. Individual bacterial phyla were found to be specifically correlated with certain physico-chemical factors such as temperature, dissolved SiO2, elemental S, total sulphide, calcium concentrations in hot spring water. Bacterial reads involved in sulfur cycle were identified in both16S rRNA gene library and sulfur metabolism may play key physiological functions in this hot spring. Members within Desulfobacterales and Thermodesulfovibrionaceae were identified and hypothesized their role in regulating sulfur cycle. The presence of many taxonomically unsolved sequences in the 16S rRNA gene tag datasets from these hot springs could be a sign of novel microbe richness in these less known hot water bodies of Northeastern India.Entities:
Keywords: Archaeal diversity; Bacterial diversity; Community composition; Hot spring; Illumina sequencing
Year: 2016 PMID: 27832517 PMCID: PMC5104702 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-016-0284-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Fig. 1Geographical location of the sampling sites
Dissolved elemental analysis of the samples
| Research site | pH | Parameters | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temp. (°C) | DO (mg/l) | Na (mg/l) | Ca (mg/l) | K (mg/l) | Mg (mg/l) | Fe (mg/l) | As (mg/l) | P (mg/l) | Cl (mg/l) | S (mg/l) | NO3 (mg/l) | Al (mg/l) | Si (mg/l) | Dissolved SiO2 (mg/l) | Total sulphide (mg/l) | ||
| Jakrem | 9–10 | 46 | 3.0 | 69.25 | 3.48 | 0.875 | 0.239 | 0.023 | <0.01 | 0.054 | 13.20 | 12.69 | 0.012 | 0.093 | 16.75 | 12.82 | <0.01 |
| Yumthang | 8–9 | 39 | 4.0 | 49.25 | 1.56 | 0.66 | <0.01 | 0.015 | <0.01 | 0.104 | 21.83 | 6.62 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 4.60 | 7.55 | 0.16 |
Rock mineral analysis by Xpert High score software
| Research site | High score minerals in descending order of their abundance |
|---|---|
| Jakrem | Quartz > Tridymite > Raspite > Wollastonite > Rankinite > Kyanite > Forsterite > Clinoenstatite > Tungstite |
| Yumthang | Quartz > Wollastonite > Cuprite > Molybdite > Tenorite > Kyanite |
Diversity indices for of hot spring microbial communities
| Sample name | Shannon–Weaver index (H) | Chao 1 | Number of OTU |
|---|---|---|---|
| JM1 | 1.963 | 1561 | 561 |
| YM1 | 2.10 | 1891 | 891 |
Fig. 2Rarefaction analysis of alpha diversity among JM1 and YM1. Shannon diversity matrix was used
Pre-processing read statistics of illumina paired-end reads
| Sample name | Total reads | Passed conserved region filter | Passed spacer | Passed read quality filter | Passed mismatch filter | Consensus reads | After singleton removal | Chimeric sequences | Pre-processed reads |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JM1 | 682,049 | 627,554 | 625,976 | 625,830 | 577,872 | 577,872 | 540,719 | 637 | 540,082 |
| YM1 | 509,150 | 461,665 | 461,019 | 460,943 | 402,969 | 402,969 | 342,830 | 1290 | 341,540 |
Fig. 3Taxonomic classification of OTUs at phylum level (JM1—Jakrem samples, YM1—Yumthang samples)
Fig. 4Taxonomic classification of reads at phylum level (JM1—Jakrem samples, YM1—Yumthang samples)
Fig. 5Correlative relationship between dominant microbial phyla and geochemical factors (Temperature, pH, Na, Ca, Cl, dissolved SiO2, K, elemental S, total sulphide and Si)
Fig. 6KEGG based analysis of sulfur metabolism